Skip to main content

Establishment profile

WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.

716 SIPES STREET, KINGS MOUNTAIN, NC, 28086
Operated by WHITE OAK MANAGEMENT · 1 of 13 establishments
623110Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities)
EIN 621099917

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
3
over 33 years
Violations
10
$2,188 in penalties
Penalties
$2,188
$219 avg
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC. has accumulated 10 OSHA violations across 3 inspections over 33 years of recorded history, with $2,188 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 84th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 736 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 85th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 years ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and CMS nursing home enforcement records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
3
0.1 / yr · last 33 yrs
Violations
10
0.3 / yr
Penalties
$2,188
$219 avg / violation
10% serious90% other
Inspection trigger · planned
3 of 3

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 10 distinct standards shown · 10 citations in this view · $2,188 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0305 B0211$975Oct 1993Oct 1993
29 CFR 1910.0151 C11$813Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.1030 F02 I11$400Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0502 K01 III11Dec 2021Dec 2021
29 CFR 1910.0303 B0211Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 IIIA11Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0334 A02 II11Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0215 A0411Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.1030 C01 IV11Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0305 B0111Oct 1993Oct 1993

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

84th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 6231 within NC. Peer group: 736 employers. This establishment has 10 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
80th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
85th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
4.3
vs industry
−0.2
TRIR
8.6
vs industry
+2.3

Reported for 155 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
6.3
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
4.5
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
8.6
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
3

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
4 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 4+ years. Most recent activity: 4 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

CMS nursing-home record

CCN 345151

CMS abuse icon
Overall rating
2 of 5 stars
Certified beds
154
Deficiencies (3y)
12
CMS fines
$53,811

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (Care Compare) — health-inspection deficiencies, fines, and ratings. Full nursing-home record →

CMS Care Compare deficiencies

Every Health Deficiency citation issued by CMS surveyors during this facility’s annual and complaint-triggered surveys. F-tags reference 42 CFR 483 regulatory requirements (resident rights, staffing, infection control, medication management, etc.). Scope-severity letters grade citations from A (isolated potential harm) through L (widespread immediate jeopardy); immediate-jeopardy citations are the critical signal. 13 citations across 3 surveys · 1 immediate jeopardy · 3 complaint-triggered · 13 marked corrected.

Survey dateF-TagSeverityDescriptionTypeCorrected
Aug 20250600J (IJ)
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
StandardSep 2025
Aug 20250609E
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
StandardSep 2025
Aug 20250610E
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
StandardSep 2025
Aug 20250700E
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
StandardSep 2025
Aug 20250550D
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
ComplaintSep 2025
Aug 20250583D
Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
ComplaintSep 2025
Aug 20250627D
Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
StandardSep 2025
Aug 20250677D
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
ComplaintSep 2025
Aug 20250757D
Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
StandardSep 2025
May 20240656D
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
StandardJun 2024
May 20240880D
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Infection Control Deficiencies
StandardJun 2024
May 20240914D
Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
Environmental Deficiencies
StandardJun 2024
Jan 20230580D
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
StandardFeb 2023

Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies dataset. Standard survey citations come from routine annual inspections; complaint citations come from CMS investigations of resident or family complaints; infection control citations come from focused infection-prevention surveys. F-tag definitions are at cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/nursinghomequalityinits.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2021-09-21Planned1$0
2003-03-05Planned71$1,213
1993-08-26Planned2$975

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC. is one of 13 establishments rolled up under the parent organization WHITE OAK MANAGEMENT.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of WHITE OAK MANAGEMENT across all 13 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in nursing care facilities (skilled nursing facilities) within NC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by WHITE OAK MANAGEMENT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup WHITE OAK MANAGEMENT, which operates 13 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC. has 3 OSHA inspections on record with 10 violations and $2,188 in total penalties.
How does WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC. operates in the nursing care facilities (skilled nursing facilities) industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 6.3. WHITE OAK MANOR - KINGS MOUNTAIN, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 4.31 compared to an industry average of 4.5.