Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

THE BOEING COMPANY

8123 E MARGINAL WAY S, SEATTLE, WA, 98124
Operated by Boeing Co · 1 of 296 establishments
336411 — Aircraft Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
8
over 37 years
Violations
44
$32,730 in penalties
Penalties
$32,730
$744 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 fatality · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

THE BOEING COMPANY has accumulated 44 OSHA violations across 8 inspections over 37 years of recorded history, with $32,730 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 99th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 177 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 93rd percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 18 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

THE BOEING COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
8
0.2 / yr · last 37 yrs
Violations
44
1.2 / yr
Penalties
$32,730
$744 avg / violation
48% serious52% other
Inspection trigger · referral
4 of 8
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 8

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 3 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 24 citations in this view · $32,730 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.1000 E31—Oct 1989Oct 1989
5A000122$9,400Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0179 C0221$8,000Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0111$5,000Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.1000 A0111$4,000Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 0240.097002 A11$1,190Oct 1998Oct 1998
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0211$1,000Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0179 N03 VI11$700Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.1000 B0111$540Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.1000 B0211$450Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0107 C0211$450Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0134 E0511$360Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0179 N03 X11$300Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0133 A0111$270Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0132 A11$270Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.1200 H0111$270Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1904.0002 A11$215Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1904.0002 B0211$215Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1904.000411$100Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 0241.20090111—Jul 1990Jul 1990

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

99th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3364 within WA. Peer group: 177 employers. This establishment has 44 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
98th
peer median: $380
Inspection frequency
93rd
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.0
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
—
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
2
Accident
1
Referral
4
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Mar 20, 2003RESPIRATORY,COLLAPSE,CPRFatality1—1

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
18 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 18+ years. Most recent activity: 18 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour breakdown by law

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 3 violations · $0 in backwages

StatutePeriodCasesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
H-1B visa wage protectionsOct 200713———

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 3 violations · $0 in backwages

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Nov 2005 – Oct 2007Aircraft ManufacturingH-1B30——

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in WA — for Boeing Co, not this location alone

Total cases
168
Unfair labor practice
158
Representation (union)
9

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Boeing Co locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 95 ULP · 4 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
19-CA-386575Unfair labor practiceMay 2026—OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-386302Unfair labor practiceApr 2026—OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-379229Unfair labor practiceJan 2026—OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-372756Unfair labor practiceSep 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-369799Unfair labor practiceJul 2025—OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-366312Unfair labor practiceMay 2025—OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-359015Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Apr 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-358096Unfair labor practiceJan 2025—OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-352278Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-352164Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-351967Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-351744Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Jan 2026ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-351089Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-350551Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-350078Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-346716Unfair labor practiceJul 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-346569Unfair labor practiceJul 2024—OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-346485Unfair labor practiceJul 2024Sep 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-344731Unfair labor practiceJun 2024Dec 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-342627Unfair labor practiceMay 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-342356Unfair labor practiceMay 2024—OpenRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-340434Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-340345Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-339642Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-337316Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-337030Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Jun 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-334546Unfair labor practiceJan 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-330722Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Jun 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-328418Unfair labor practiceOct 2023May 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-327605Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-323659Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Jul 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-321954Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Aug 2024ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-318867Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-316727Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Jul 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-315495Unfair labor practiceApr 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-313984Unfair labor practiceMar 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-307943Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Nov 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-307120Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Feb 2023ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-302749Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-293820Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-291193Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-289503Unfair labor practiceJan 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-277891Unfair labor practiceMay 2021Dec 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-275471Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Jun 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-274029Unfair labor practiceMar 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-272489Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Jan 2025ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-267029Unfair labor practiceOct 2020Oct 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-264525Unfair labor practiceAug 2020Nov 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-264524Unfair labor practiceAug 2020Sep 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-263288Unfair labor practiceJul 2020Nov 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-263287Unfair labor practiceJul 2020Jul 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-262833Unfair labor practiceJul 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-262102Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-262060Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-261609Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-261579Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-261578Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-261140Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Nov 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-259642Unfair labor practiceApr 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-256040Unfair labor practiceFeb 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-254438Unfair labor practiceJan 2020Feb 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-RD-254116Representation electionJan 2020Apr 2020ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-251709Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Aug 2022ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-249755Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-249154Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Jun 2021ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-239453Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-232218Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Aug 2019ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-225469Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-221715Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-221279Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-218143Unfair labor practiceApr 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-215020Unfair labor practiceFeb 2018Mar 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-RC-207900Representation electionOct 2017Oct 2017ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-205893Unfair labor practiceSep 2017May 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-UC-203760UCAug 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-203670Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-201010Unfair labor practiceJun 2017Jul 2017ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-196561Unfair labor practiceApr 2017Jun 2017ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-186473Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Feb 2017ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-186003Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-184230Unfair labor practiceSep 2016Oct 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-179729Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Sep 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-RC-174866Representation electionApr 2016Aug 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-174906Unfair labor practiceApr 2016Jul 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-173301Unfair labor practiceApr 2016Apr 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-172334Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Feb 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-167570Unfair labor practiceJan 2016Mar 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-RD-165896Representation electionDec 2015Feb 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-162857Unfair labor practiceOct 2015May 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-159841Unfair labor practiceSep 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-158939Unfair labor practiceAug 2015Sep 2015ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-150558Unfair labor practiceApr 2015Jul 2015ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-147636Unfair labor practiceMar 2015Apr 2018ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-135714Unfair labor practiceAug 2014Oct 2014ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-135406Unfair labor practiceAug 2014May 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-132858Unfair labor practiceJul 2014Nov 2014ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-130052Unfair labor practiceJun 2014Jan 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-128941Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Oct 2016ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-128328Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jan 2015ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
19-CA-127687Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Jun 2014ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$-24460.95
Obligated (all-time)
$319.4M
Awards
1,021
Top agency
Department of Defense
$316.3M
Company-wide — THE BOEING COMPANY (across 148 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$62.0B
Obligated (all-time)
$325.7B
Awards (all-time)
180,783

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Top agencies by obligation (this location)
Department of Defense$316.3M
National Aeronautics and Space Administration$3.1M
Largest awards (top 50 of 1,021)
  • Department of Defense
    OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE AIRBORNE LASER TESTBED I.E. SUPPORT FUNCTIONS.
    contract · Last action 2018-07-27
    $76,489,417
  • Department of Defense
    200306!000157!5700!GD30 !OKLAHOMA CITY ALC/LAD !F3460103C0042 !A!N! !N! !20030331!20031231!039267141!039267141!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !7755 E MARGINAL WAY !SEATTLE !WA!98124!63000!033!53!SEATTLE !KING !WASHINGTON!+000004025412!N!N!000000000000!R414!SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SERVICES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !3CNF!ZAGM-86 !336413!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !D!U!J!1!001!N!1G!A!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
    contract · Last action 2024-04-18
    $50,896,993
  • Department of Defense
    AIRBORNE LASER TESTBED CORE EXPERIMENT REQUIREMENTS
    contract · Last action 2018-08-07
    $44,426,235
  • Department of Defense
    200608!000057!5700!FA8107!OC-ALC/LAD B52 !FA810705C0009 !A!N! !N! !P00008!20060515!20140930!039267141!039267141!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !7755 E MARGINAL WAY !SEATTLE !WA!98124!63000!033!53!SEATTLE !KING !WASHINGTON!+000000300000!N!N!000000000000!R706!LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !336411!E! !3! ! !C! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !D!U!J!1!001!N!1A!Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
    contract · Last action 2021-01-13
    $23,901,918
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2013-11-19
    $18,390,414
  • Department of Defense
    CONE ASSEMBLY,BOOM
    contract · Last action 2012-06-13
    $8,271,271
  • Department of Defense
    DUCT ASSEMBLY,AIR C
    contract · Last action 2010-10-08
    $6,754,575
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2013-06-03
    $6,073,709
  • Department of Defense
    contract · Last action 2016-06-23
    $5,869,397
  • Department of Defense
    200512!293601!1700!N00019!NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0001905C0052 !A!N! !N! ! !20050606!20051130!039267141!039267141!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !7755 E MARGINAL WAY !SEATTLE !WA!98124!63000!033!53!SEATTLE !KING !WASHINGTON!+000001061200!N!N!000006461200!J015!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPS !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !* !541330!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !D!N!J!1!001!N!1B!Z!N!Z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! !1719!N00019!0001! !
    contract · Last action 2009-05-21
    $3,851,302
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2018-06-27
    $3,247,511
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2015-01-23
    $2,988,593
  • Department of Defense
    ENGINEERING SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2016-04-14
    $2,984,714
  • Department of Defense
    DATA CO-PROCESSOR (DCP) ENHANCEMENT (FMS AUSTRALIA, FMS CANADA) IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2017-03-01
    $2,880,986
  • Department of Defense
    KA-BAND AST-9 POD SYSTEM BUILD PROGRAM IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2020-07-06
    $2,520,943
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2018-05-17
    $2,471,609
  • Department of Defense
    200505!000954!5700!FA8650!DET 1 AFRL/PK !FA865005C3500 !A!N! !Y! ! !20041217!20070103!039267141!039267141!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !7755 E MARGINAL WAY !SEATTLE !WA!98124!63000!033!53!SEATTLE !KING !WASHINGTON!+000000639000!N!N!000001480951!AC93!RDTE/MISC HARD GOODS-ADV TECH DEV !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B!A! !A! !A!N!U!2!002!E! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
    contract · Last action 2016-06-20
    $2,433,543
  • Department of Defense
    BLENDED WING BODY CONFIGURATION FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
    contract · Last action 2015-04-27
    $2,262,471
  • Department of Defense
    contract · Last action 2015-09-30
    $2,187,775
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF F/A-18 AESA BIT/STABILITY/SYSTEM ANOMALY REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS OF DEFICIENCIES IMPROVEMENT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROGRAM.
    contract · Last action 2017-06-19
    $2,171,142
  • Department of Defense
    DRAG BRACE,LANDING
    contract · Last action 2011-06-13
    $2,081,525
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO.0008
    contract · Last action 2017-08-02
    $2,055,037
  • Department of Defense
    ATMOSPHERIC COMPENSATION DEFORMABLE MIRROR
    contract · Last action 2015-06-10
    $1,904,452
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2018-05-21
    $1,890,296
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF DATA CO-PROCESSOR (DCP) LIMITED PRODUCTION (FMS)
    contract · Last action 2017-03-01
    $1,838,947
  • Department of Defense
    200606!005314!5700!FA8650!DET 1 AFRL/PK !F3361500D3052 !A!N! !Y!0068 ! !20060314!20090608!039267141!039267141!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !7755 E MARGINAL WAY !SEATTLE !WA!98124!63000!033!53!SEATTLE !KING !WASHINGTON!+000000450000!N!N!000000000000!AD92!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541710!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!A!N!U!2!002!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
    contract · Last action 2015-04-14
    $1,688,578
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    FLIGHT CRITICAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH
    contract · Last action 2018-09-17
    $1,666,112
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF UPGRADES AND TESTING OF THE MILLIMETER WAVE STEERABLE ANTENNA SYSTEMS (MMW SAS).
    contract · Last action 2023-05-22
    $1,613,678
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF ANALYSIS, FABRICATION AND TEST OF AN ADVANCED SMART TARGET THREAT SYSTEM (ASTTS) IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2021-04-07
    $1,548,472
  • Department of Defense
    B-52 FUEL CELLS
    contract · Last action 2010-11-12
    $1,462,995
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF LOW POWER MODULE (LPM) REQUIREMENTS/COMPONENT CONCEPTS/PROTOTYPE COMPONENT/SUBSYSTEM/ SYSTEM DESIGN.
    contract · Last action 2016-03-03
    $1,448,735
  • Department of Defense
    MILLIMETER WAVE SOLID STATE OFF BOARD (MMW SOB) TOWED DECOYS IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2016-07-21
    $1,429,614
  • Department of Defense
    RM&S DATA COLLECTION
    contract · Last action 2010-12-16
    $1,415,096
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2016-07-26
    $1,321,618
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF EVALUATE, DEVELOP, PROTOTYPE, BUILD, INTEGRATE, AND TEST ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY MICROELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS TO ADD CAPABILITY TO THE MICROELECTRONICS-BASED I-BAND ECM THREAT SIMULATION SYSTEM (TSS).
    contract · Last action 2021-04-06
    $1,222,029
  • Department of Defense
    IAW BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2019-05-21
    $1,141,014
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2020-07-06
    $1,139,324
  • Department of Defense
    TPS ATTACHMENTS FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES
    contract · Last action 2009-04-30
    $1,132,245
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF P-8A ELECTRONIC WARNING SELF PROTECTION (EWSP) INTEGRATION AND TESTING
    contract · Last action 2020-08-06
    $1,075,036
  • Department of Defense
    contract · Last action 2015-06-10
    $1,071,736
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO 0008.
    contract · Last action 2017-07-07
    $1,062,281
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2018-06-13
    $1,061,341
  • Department of Defense
    FAIRING,AIRCRAFT
    contract · Last action 2010-04-23
    $1,037,611
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF FINAL TESTING OF THE MEASURE AND SET WITH FILTHY BUZZARD DIGITAL RF MEMORY (MS FBZ DRF MEMORY)
    contract · Last action 2023-05-22
    $1,015,440
  • Department of Defense
    SLAT,AIRCRAFT
    contract · Last action 2008-09-27
    $999,918
  • Department of Defense
    MIXED CRITICALITY ARCHITECTURE REQUIREMENTS (MCAR)
    contract · Last action 2015-09-23
    $982,087
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2017-05-24
    $951,971
  • Department of Defense
    BASIC CONTRACT ITEM NO. 0008
    contract · Last action 2014-03-20
    $922,246
  • Department of Defense
    CERTA FCS CPI
    contract · Last action 2015-04-27
    $847,584
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    NRA AWARD UNDER FCSR TASK ORDER CONTRACT. TASK ORDER TITLE: "ROBUST COMPOSITE ADAPTIVE CONTROL FOR PILOTED AIRCRAFT". THIS EFFORT IS FOR BASIC RESEARCH THAT WILL FOCUS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THEORETICALLY JUSTIFIED AND NUMERICALLY EFFICIENT ROBUST ADAPTIVE FLIGHT CONTROL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS METHODS. LEVERAGING THE CONTRACTOR'S EXISTING FLIGHT PROVEN ADAPTIVE CONTROL ARCHITECTURES, EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE IN THEIR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS, AND LESSONS LEARNED, THESE TECHNOLOGIES WILL BE EXTENDED TO IMPROVE, PREDICT, AND QUANTIFY OVERALL SYSTEM STABILITY / ROBUSTNESS MEASURES, WITH RESPECT TO UNFORESEEN / ADVERSE FLIGHT CONDITIONS, WHILE EXPLICITLY ACCOUNTING FOR CONSTRAINTS DUE TO ACTUATORS AND ENGINE DYNAMICS. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS/BACKGROUND: (A) NASA RESEARCH ANNOUNCEMENT (NRA) IN SOLICITATION NNH07ZEA001N. (B) MIL-STD 1797 (USAF) ENTITLED 'FLYING QUALITIES OF PILOTED VEHICLES'. (C) MIL-F-9490D ENTITLED 'FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS - DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND TEST OF PILOTED AIRCRAFT GENERAL SPECIFICATION' (D) FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS (FAR): PART 25 - AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS: TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRPLANES HTTP://RGL.FAA.GOV/REGULATORY_AND_GUIDANCE_LIBRARY/RGFAR.NSF/MAINFRAME?OPENFRAMESET DESCRIPTION OF TASK REQUIREMENTS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE FOLLOWING TASKS: TASK 1: DESIGN METHODS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP ADAPTIVE CONTROL DESIGN METHODS FOR PILOTED AIRCRAFT THAT CAN ACCOMMODATE SIGNIFICANT UNANTICIPATED ERRORS DUE TO MODELING ERRORS, CONTROL FAILURES, BATTLE DAMAGE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCES. SPECIFICALLY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT FUNDAMENTAL / FORMAL DESIGN STUDIES FOR A PILOTED AIRCRAFT OPERATING UNDER ACTUATOR CONSTRAINTS AND WITH ENGINE DYNAMICS EXPLICITLY TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT DURING THE DESIGN PHASE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADDRESS THE ACHIEVABLE DYNAMICS THAT THE SYSTEM CAN ATTAIN UNDER MUTUALLY AGREED UPON FAILURES AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS BY AUGMENTING AN EXISTING BASELINE ROBUST (GAIN-SCHEDULED) FLIGHT CONTROLLER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE COMPOSITE (DIRECT + INDIRECT) ADAPTIVE MODEL REFERENCE CONTROL AND EXTEND THIS TO PILOTED AIRCRAFT BY PROVIDING BUILT-IN DESIGN EXTENSIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING ARCHITECTURE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE FLIGHT CONTROL ARCHITECTURES TO PRODUCE THEORETICALLY JUSTIFIED AND NUMERICALLY VERIFIABLE ADAPTIVE FLIGHT CONTROL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS METHODS FOR PILOTED AIRCRAFT. THESE COMPOSITE ADAPTIVE CONTROL DESIGN METHODOLOGIES CONSTITUTE THE DELIVERABLE ITEMS UNDER TASK 1. (DELIVERABLE 11) TASK 2: DESIGN EXTENSIONS AND MODIFICATIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DO DESIGN MODIFICATIONS TO FURTHER IMPROVE AND ENHANCE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE, STABILITY, AND ROBUSTNESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LEVERAGE RECENT RESULTS RELATED TO THE DESIGN OF ADAPTIVE CONTROLLERS FOR SYSTEMS WITH NONLINEAR-IN-CONTROL DYNAMICS, OPERATING UNDER ACTUATOR CONSTRAINTS, AND IN THE PRESENCE OF NOTCH FILTERS OR ANY OTHER DEVICES THAT ARE DESIGNED TO PREVENT STRUCTURAL MODE INTERACTIONS. THESE DESIGN MODIFICATIONS AND THEIR ANALYSIS METHODS SHALL BE PRODUCED USING FORMAL (LYAPUNOV-BASED) METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONCENTRATE ON FORMULATION OF THEORETICAL CONDITIONS FOR CLOSED-LOOP STABILITY AND PREDICTABLE PERFORMANCE, IN THE PRESENCE OF LARGE AERODYNAMIC UNCERTAINTIES, ACTUATOR CONSTRAINTS, ENGINE DYNAMICS, AND STRUCTURAL MODE INTERACTION. THESE RESEARCH OBJECTIVES SHALL DIRECTLY SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF VERIFIABLE ADAPTIVE FLIGHT CONTROL TECHNOLOGY FOR PILOTED AIRCRAFT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DELIVER ADAPTIVE FLIGHT CONTROL DESIGN EXTENSIONS AND THEIR ANALYSIS METHODS. (DELIVERABLE 12) TASK 3: STABILITY AND ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS METHODS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NUMERICALLY QUANTIFY CLOSED-LOOP TRANSIENT CHARACTERISTICS AND GAIN / TIME-DELAY MARGINS ON THE GOVERNMENT-PROVIDED AIRCRAFT SIMULATION MODEL (SEE GFI CHART BELOW). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TUNING DESIGN GUIDELINES NEEDED TO ENSURE STABLE, PREDICTABLE, AND VERIFIABLE ADAPTIVE FL
    contract · Last action 2018-12-14
    $812,732

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 541330 - ENGINEERING SERVICES. Last action: 2024-04-18. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2003-03-28Accident0—$0
1998-07-24Referral11$1,190
1997-04-10Complaint0—$0
1993-12-22Follow-up0—$0
1990-03-09Referral4—$0
1990-02-09Complaint0—$0
1989-06-09Referral198$15,930
1989-06-09Referral2012$15,610

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

THE BOEING COMPANY is one of 296 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Boeing Co.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Boeing Co across all 296 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in aircraft manufacturing within WA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Boeing Co, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on THE BOEING COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Boeing Co, which operates 296 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is THE BOEING COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
THE BOEING COMPANY has 8 OSHA inspections on record with 44 violations and $32,730 in total penalties.
How does THE BOEING COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
THE BOEING COMPANY operates in the aircraft manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.
Has THE BOEING COMPANY had any workplace fatalities?
Yes. Federal records show 1 fatality investigation involving THE BOEING COMPANY.