Skip to main content

Establishment profile

AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD

1206 N FULTON STREET, RAEFORD, NC, 28376
Operated by SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP · 1 of 82 establishments
623110Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities)
EIN 561161596

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
3
over 27 years
Violations
9
$1,700 in penalties
Penalties
$1,700
$189 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
2 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD has accumulated 9 OSHA violations across 3 inspections over 27 years of recorded history, with $1,700 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 81st percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 740 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 86th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and CMS nursing home enforcement records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
3
0.1 / yr · last 27 yrs
Violations
9
0.3 / yr
Penalties
$1,700
$189 avg / violation
11% serious89% other
Inspection trigger · planned
2 of 3
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 3

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 9 distinct standards shown · 9 citations in this view · $1,700 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0305 B0211$700Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$500Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.1030 D0111$500Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0303 G01 I11Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0157 C0111Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0106 D07 IA11Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0151 C11Mar 2003Mar 2003
29 CFR 1910.0037 Q0111Jul 2002Jul 2002
29 CFR 1910.1200 E0111Jul 1999Jul 1999

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

81st

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 6231 within NC. Peer group: 740 employers. This establishment has 9 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
76th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
86th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
50.0
vs industry
+45.5
TRIR
50.0
vs industry
+43.7

Reported for 130 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
6.3
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
4.5
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
50.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
2
Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
11 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 11+ years. Most recent activity: 11 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Jul 2013 – Jul 2015Nursing Care Facilities0

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

CMS nursing-home record

CCN 345280 · Chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP

CMS abuse icon
Overall rating
2 of 5 stars
Certified beds
132
Deficiencies (3y)
4
CMS fines
$32,631

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (Care Compare) — health-inspection deficiencies, fines, and ratings. Full nursing-home record →

CMS Care Compare deficiencies

Every Health Deficiency citation issued by CMS surveyors during this facility’s annual and complaint-triggered surveys. F-tags reference 42 CFR 483 regulatory requirements (resident rights, staffing, infection control, medication management, etc.). Scope-severity letters grade citations from A (isolated potential harm) through L (widespread immediate jeopardy); immediate-jeopardy citations are the critical signal. 4 citations across 4 surveys · 2 immediate jeopardy · 2 complaint-triggered.

Survey dateF-TagSeverityDescriptionTypeCorrected
Feb 20260759D
Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Standard
Sep 20250684J (IJ)
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Complaint
Oct 20240688D
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Standard
Apr 20240600J (IJ)
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Complaint

Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies dataset. Standard survey citations come from routine annual inspections; complaint citations come from CMS investigations of resident or family complaints; infection control citations come from focused infection-prevention surveys. F-tag definitions are at cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/nursinghomequalityinits.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2003-02-10Planned71$1,700
2002-07-02Complaint1$0
1999-05-18Planned1$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD is one of 82 establishments rolled up under the parent organization SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP across all 82 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in nursing care facilities (skilled nursing facilities) within NC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP, which operates 82 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD's OSHA violation history?
AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD has 3 OSHA inspections on record with 9 violations and $1,700 in total penalties.
How does AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD's safety record compare to its industry?
AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD operates in the nursing care facilities (skilled nursing facilities) industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 6.3. AUTUMN CARE OF RAEFORD's self-reported DART rate is 50 compared to an industry average of 4.5.