Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

THE BOEING COMPANY

2060 E IMPERIAL HIGHWAY; BUILDING S25, EL SEGUNDO, CA, 90245
Operated by Boeing Co · 1 of 297 establishments
336411 — Aircraft Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 12 years
Violations
3
$860 in penalties
Penalties
$860
$287 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

THE BOEING COMPANY has accumulated 3 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 12 years of recorded history, with $860 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 53rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 321 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 65th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

THE BOEING COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.2 / yr · last 12 yrs
Violations
3
0.3 / yr
Penalties
$860
$287 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 2

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 3 distinct standards shown · 3 citations in this view · $860 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
3210 A11$300Feb 2014Feb 2014
29 CFR 2340.0012 A11$280Jan 2025Jan 2025
29 CFR 2340.0016 B11$280Jan 2025Jan 2025

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

53rd

Above average violations in NAICS 3364 within CA. Peer group: 321 employers. This establishment has 3 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
38th
peer median: $2,580
Inspection frequency
65th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−1.4
TRIR
0.0
vs industry
−2.0

Reported for 184 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.0
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
1 year ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for Boeing Co, not this location alone

Total cases
39
Unfair labor practice
31
Representation (union)
6

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Boeing Co locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 39 cases · 31 ULP · 6 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
32-RC-390231Representation electionJul 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RD-376921Representation electionDec 2025Feb 2026ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-375586Unfair labor practiceNov 2025—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-366295Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-366242Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-366003Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-359663Unfair labor practiceFeb 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
19-UC-208035UCOct 2017Oct 2017ClosedRegion 19, Seattle, Washington
21-CA-202372Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-159138Unfair labor practiceAug 2015Mar 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-136064Unfair labor practiceSep 2014Nov 2014ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-132446Unfair labor practiceJul 2014Oct 2014ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-132445Unfair labor practiceJul 2014Oct 2014ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-126929Unfair labor practiceApr 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-126928Unfair labor practiceApr 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-122108Unfair labor practiceFeb 2014Nov 2014ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-093678Unfair labor practiceNov 2012Jan 2013ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-039778Unfair labor practiceApr 2011Jun 2011ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-039657Unfair labor practiceJan 2011Mar 2011ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-039588Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Dec 2012ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-039400Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-039320Unfair labor practiceApr 2010May 2010ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-018230Representation electionFeb 2009Mar 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-RM-001290Representation electionApr 2008Jan 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RM-001289Representation electionApr 2008Jan 2012ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-038058Unfair labor practiceOct 2007Dec 2007ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RD-002839Representation electionSep 2007Nov 2007ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-037872Unfair labor practiceJul 2007Oct 2007ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-037756Unfair labor practiceApr 2007Jun 2008ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-037755Unfair labor practiceApr 2007May 2007ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-UC-000311UCApr 2005Dec 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-035254Unfair labor practiceJul 2002Aug 2004ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-035204Unfair labor practiceJun 2002Apr 2003ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-035087Unfair labor practiceApr 2002Aug 2002ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-033926Unfair labor practiceApr 2000Jan 2001ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-033581Unfair labor practiceOct 1999Jun 2000ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-033421Unfair labor practiceJul 1999Dec 1999ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-033294Unfair labor practiceApr 1999Feb 2000ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-033233Unfair labor practiceMar 1999Oct 1999ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 3 facilities · 2 marked inactive.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
THE BOEING COMPANY
2060 E IMPERIAL HWY · EL SEGUNDO, CA, 90245
WaterNo Violation Identified00—Oct 2018View →
THE BOEING COMPANY
650-700 N SEPULVEDA BLVD · EL SEGUNDO, CA, 90245
RCRANo Violation Identified00—Nov 2017View →
THE BOEING COMPANY
601-603 LAIRPORT ST · EL SEGUNDO, CA, 90245
RCRANo Violation Identified00——View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$6.4B
Obligated (all-time)
$6.5B
Awards
59
Top agency
Department of Defense
$5.4B
Company-wide — THE BOEING COMPANY (across 148 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$122.9B
Obligated (all-time)
$328.4B
Awards (all-time)
181,637

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Top agencies by obligation (this location)
Department of Defense$5.4B
National Aeronautics and Space Administration$1.1B
Department of Commerce$2.2M
Largest awards (top 50 of 59)
  • Department of Defense
    WGS BLOCK II FOLLOW ON
    contract · Last action 2026-03-13
    $3,127,786,036
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    THIS CONTRACT IS TO DESIGN, DEVELOP, FABRICATE, INTEGRATE, TEST, SHIP, PROVIDE LAUNCH SUPPORT, CONDUCT ON-ORBIT CHECKOUT OPERATIONS AND PROVIDE SUSTAINING ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR TWO TRACKING DATA RELAY SATELLITE (TDRS) SPACECRAFT. THE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS ALSO INCLUDE THE DESIGN, ASSEMBLE, TEST, INSTALL AND VERIFICATION OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE WHITE SANDS COMPLEX NECESSARY TO MAKE THE GROUND TERMINALS FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE TDRS K PROGRAM SPACECRAFT DESIGN. THE CONTRACT ALSO INCLUDES OPTIONS FOR TWO ADDITIONAL SPACECRAFT.
    contract · Last action 2023-10-04
    $1,139,064,815
  • Department of Defense
    EVOLVED STRATEGIC SATELLITE COMMUNICATION (ESS) SPACE DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION
    contract · Last action 2026-04-01
    $754,672,763
  • Department of Defense
    PROTECTED TACTICAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE
    contract · Last action 2026-03-17
    $551,388,199
  • Department of Defense
    EVOLVED STRATEGIC SATELLITE COMMUNICATION PROTOTYPE
    contract · Last action 2025-07-15
    $424,039,287
  • Department of Defense
    SPACE BASED SPACE SURVEILLANCE (SBSS) BLOCK 10 SUSTAINMENT CONTRACT
    contract · Last action 2026-04-01
    $240,606,547
  • Department of Defense
    MOBILE USER OBJECTIVE SYSTEM SERVICE LIFE EXTENSION PHASE 1
    contract · Last action 2026-03-31
    $87,985,491
  • Department of Defense
    SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
    contract · Last action 2026-01-12
    $69,382,300
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF AWARD OF WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM ON-ORBIT OPERATIONS AND LOGISITCS SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT CONTRACT
    contract · Last action 2021-09-17
    $45,728,485
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF ON-ORBIT REPROGRAMMABLE DIGITAL WAVEFORM GENERATOR (ORDWG)
    contract · Last action 2022-04-12
    $19,554,515
  • Department of Defense
    200610!000055!5700!FA8808!SMC/MLK !FA880806C0001 !A!N! !N! ! !20060217!20070731!928989730!928989730!009256819!N!BOEING SATELLITE SYSTEMS, INC !2260 E IMPERIAL HWY !EL SEGUNDO !CA!90245!22412!037!06!EL SEGUNDO !LOS ANGELES !CALIFORNIA!+000100582900!N!N!000148195269!1820!SPACE VEHICLE COMPONENTS !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !326 !WIDEBAND GAPFILLER !334220!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !D!U!L!1!001!N!1G!A!Y!F! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! !
    contract · Last action 2018-09-05
    $17,935,185
  • Department of Defense
    PROTECTED TACTICAL MILSATCOM
    contract · Last action 2014-09-17
    $8,490,089
  • Department of Defense
    DESIGN, DEVELOP, TEST, AND PRODUCE GLOBAL VARIANTS OF THE PROTECTED TACTICAL SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SPACE VEHICLES, ASSOCIATED GROUND SYSTEMS AND ANCHOR STATIONS.
    contract · Last action 2025-09-11
    $7,500,834
  • Department of Defense
    GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III SPACE VEHICLES 11+ PHASE 1 PRODUCTION READINESS FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT
    contract · Last action 2018-01-09
    $5,993,786
  • Department of Defense
    ACT AIMS TO DRAMATICALLY SHORTEN THE TIMESCALES ASSOCIATED WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC ARRAY DEVELOPMENT, DEPLOYMENT AND UPGRADE. SPECIFICALLY, TECHNICAL AREA 1 (TA1) - THE SUBJECT OF THIS SPECIFIC CONTRACT - WILL DEPART FROM TRADITIONAL HIGHLY-SPECIALIZED AND TIMECONSUMING ARRAY DESIGN METHODOLOGIES AND FOCUS ON REALIZATION OF A COMMON HARDWARE MODULE THAT CAN BE BROADLY APPLIED TO MANY DISPARATE ARRAY FUNCTIONS.
    contract · Last action 2018-01-09
    $5,784,971
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF L-BAND RF AMPLIFIER FOR THE GPS SPACECRAFT NAVIGATION PAYLOAD
    contract · Last action 2022-08-09
    $4,504,706
  • Department of Defense
    WEATHEER SATELLITE FOLLOW-ON SYSTEMS (MICROWAVE SENSOR)
    contract · Last action 2018-01-09
    $2,810,824
  • Department of Defense
    THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES ADVANCED RESEARCH EFFORTS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY READINESS OF GROUND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY MATURATION CONCEPTS.
    contract · Last action 2022-01-10
    $2,699,262
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    NASA IS PARTICIPATING WITH THE DOC/NOAA IN A MULTI-SATELLITE PROGRAM TO PROVIDE CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF EARTH AND SPACE ENVIRONMENT PARAMETERS. THE MONITORED PARAMETERS WILL PROVIDE DATA FOR WEATHER PREDICTION MODELS AND PROVIDE SEVERE WEATHER WARNING DATA. THE PROGRAM IS TERMED GEOSTATIONARY OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE (GOES) AND IS ACCOMPLISHED USING TWO NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITES STATIONED AT TWO LONGITUDES OVER THE EQUATOR. THE GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER (GSFC) GOES PROJECT OFFICE HAS BEEN GIVEN RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROCURING THE NECESSARY HARDWARE AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO MEET THE MISSION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE SPACECRAFT CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH THE NECESSARY PERSONNEL, FACILITIES, SERVICES, AND MATERIALS TO DESIGN, FABRICATE, INTEGRATE, TEST, DELIVER ON-ORBIT TO NASA, AND SUPPORT ON-ORBIT OPERATIONS FOR ALL OF THE GOES N-Q SPACECRAFT DEVELOPED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. THIS WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS TO THE CONTRACT. IN ACCOMPLISHING THE DEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY OF THE GOES N-Q SPACECRAFT, THE SPACECRAFT CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE FOLLOWING: 1. PROVIDE THE SPACECRAFT BUS AND THE SPACE ENVIRONMENT MONITOR (SEM) INSTRUMENTS FOR EACH OF THE GOES SPACECRAFT. 2. RECEIVE THE GFE INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (GSE), THEN INTEGRATE THEM WITH THE SPACECRAFT BUS AND PERFORM SPACECRAFT LEVEL TESTING. 3. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED SPACECRAFT MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL GSE. 4. PROVIDE A SPACECRAFT EMULATOR AND INR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 5. DELIVER AND SUPPORT INTEGRATION, VERIFICATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF GROUND SYSTEM HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE. 6. DESIGN AND SUPPORT INTEGRATION AND VERIFICATION OF ANY MODIFICATIONS OR REPLACEMENTS TO NOAA GROUND SYSTEM HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE. 7. SUPPORT COMBINED SPACECRAFT AND GROUND SYSTEM TESTING, AND GOES END-TO-END TESTING BEFORE LAUNCH. 8. PROVIDE ALL SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROCUREMENT, LAUNCH BASE PROCESSING FACILITY, LAUNCH BASE COORDINATION AND SAFETY, SPACECRAFT/LAUNCH VEHICLE INTEGRATION AND CHECKOUT, AND LAUNCH. 9. PROVIDE ALL SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH FLIGHT OPERATIONS FROM THE LAUNCH VEHICLE/SPACECRAFT SEPARATION THROUGH SPACECRAFT POSITIONING IN GEOSTATIONARY CHECKOUT ORBIT. 10. SUPPORT ALL SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ON-ORBIT SPACECRAFT CHECKOUT AND SUPPORT ASSOCIATED WITH INSTRUMENT AND INR CHECKOUT. 11. PROVIDE SPACECRAFT OPERATOR AND ENGINEERING TRAINING FOR ON-ORBIT OPERATION. 12. PROVIDE ON-ORBIT ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR THE SPACECRAFT SUPPORT GROUND SYSTEM (SSGS) AND EACH SPACECRAFT. THE SPACECRAFT CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO DELIVER THE GOES N-Q SPACECRAFT FULLY COMPATIBLE AND OPERATIONAL WITH NOAA GROUND SYSTEMS: THE SATELLITE OPERATIONS CONTROL CENTER (SOCC), SUITLAND, MD; THE WALLOPS COMMAND AND DATA ACQUISITION STATION (WCDAS), WALLOPS, VA; A BACKUP CDAS; AND THE SPACE ENVIRONMENT CENTER (SEC), BOULDER, CO. CHANGES TO THE EXISTING GROUND SYSTEMS TO ACCOMMODATE UPGRADED OR ADDITIONAL CAPABILITIES ARE PERMITTED AS DEFINED IN SECTION 3.5. THE CONTRACTOR S DELIVERED SPACECRAFT AND ASSOCIATED EFFORTS SHALL MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE GOES N-Q PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION.
    contract · Last action 2023-08-30
    $2,250,260
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF ICECOOL APPLICATIONS
    contract · Last action 2020-05-05
    $2,199,420
  • Department of Commerce
    ANOMALY SUPPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR GOES-NOP SATELLITE SPACECRAFTS.
    contract · Last action 2025-08-29
    $2,178,067
  • Department of Defense
    UFO SATELLITE TECHNICAL SUPPORT
    contract · Last action 2025-09-17
    $2,005,271
  • Department of Defense
    DIRECTIONAL NETWORK PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA (DNPAA) PRODUCTION
    contract · Last action 2024-07-29
    $1,973,413
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF TROPOSPHERIC EMISSIONS MONITORING OF POLLUTION (TEMPO) STUDY
    contract · Last action 2014-08-04
    $799,899
  • Department of Defense
    ONGOING TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TASKS
    contract · Last action 2020-05-11
    $701,822
  • Department of Defense
    SATELLITE MANUFACTURER ANOMALY SUPPORT FOR UFO SATELLITES WILL PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO DIAGNOSIS, REPAIR, SERVICE OR MAINTAIN THE UFO SATELLITE, SUBSYSTEMS AND PAYLOAD IN EVENT THAT 10 SOPS IS FACED WITH ANOMALIES.
    contract · Last action 2026-04-01
    $694,707
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF = OTHER FUNCTIONS; ONGOING TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TASKS
    contract · Last action 2019-03-20
    $617,416
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF = OTHER FUNCTIONS; ONGOING TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TASKS
    contract · Last action 2017-12-18
    $572,270
  • Department of Defense
    ONGOING TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TASKS IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2017-09-15
    $530,676
  • Department of Defense
    ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY (UHF) FOLLOW-ON (UFO) SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT
    contract · Last action 2025-05-19
    $526,975
  • Department of Defense
    SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT FOR ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY FOLLOW-ON SATELLITE PROGRAM
    contract · Last action 2024-08-20
    $520,848
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF = OTHER FUNCTIONS; UHF UFO SUPPORT SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2016-02-12
    $518,736
  • Department of Defense
    SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT FOR ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY FOLLOW-ON SATELLITE PROGRAM
    contract · Last action 2023-03-03
    $516,172
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    NEXT SPACE TECHNOLOGIES FOR EXPLORATION PARTNERSHIPS -2 (NEXTSTEP-2) OMNIBUS BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT (BAA) APPENDIX G: SPACE RELAY PARTNERSHIP AND SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2019-04-24
    $499,832
  • Department of Defense
    ONGOING TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TASKS
    contract · Last action 2022-09-27
    $494,434
  • Department of Defense
    ONGOING TECHNICAL ANALYSIS TASKS
    contract · Last action 2022-09-27
    $486,118
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    IGF::OT::IGF - NASA SPACE COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION PROGRAM NEXT GENERATION RELAY ARCHITECTURE CONCEPTS STUDY
    contract · Last action 2017-01-30
    $401,708
  • Department of Defense
    NAVSOC ON ORBIT SUPPORT
    contract · Last action 2019-09-27
    $275,000
  • Department of Defense
    THE USSF SSC PORTFOLIO ARCHITECT DIRECTORATE REQUIRES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COLLABORATIVE WORKING GROUP OF INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES TO CO-DEVELOP A NON-PROPRIETARY COMBAT BUS SYSTEM INTERFACE SPECIFICATION (SIS)
    contract · Last action 2022-05-12
    $266,493
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF ON ORBIT SUPPORT
    contract · Last action 2017-09-28
    $252,965
  • Department of Defense
    CAR: IGF::OT::IGF ON ORBIT SUPPORT
    contract · Last action 2018-10-12
    $250,000
  • Department of Defense
    NAVSOC ON ORBIT SUPPORT
    contract · Last action 2019-08-22
    $230,000
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF ON ORBIT SUPPORT SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2017-07-27
    $220,000
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    IGF::OT::IGF SUSTAINABLE LAND IMAGING (SLI) BUSINESS MODEL STUDY - LANDSAT SATELLITES AND ASSOCIATED U.S. GOVERNMENT GROUND PROCESSING, DISTRIBUTION, AND ARCHIVING SYSTEMS HAVE ACQUIRED AND MADE AVAILABLE GLOBAL, MODERATE-RESOLUTION (15-120M), MULTISPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS OF LAND AND COASTAL REGIONS, PROVIDING HUMANKIND S LONGEST RECORD OF OUR PLANET FROM SPACE. NASA AND THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (USGS) OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (DOI) FULLY RECOGNIZE THAT THIS INFORMATION IS A NATIONAL ASSET, PROVIDING AN IMPORTANT AND UNIQUE CAPABILITY THAT BENEFITS A BROAD COMMUNITY, INCLUDING FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS; GLOBAL CHANGE SCIENCE, ACADEMIA, AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR. LANDSAT DATA PROVIDE A CONSISTENT AND RELIABLE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH ON LAND USE CHANGE, FOREST HEALTH, AND CARBON INVENTORIES, AND CHANGES TO OUR ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE, AND NATURAL RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY LANDSAT DATA IS FREE AND OPENLY AVAILABLE TO USERS BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE GOVERNMENT. THE USGS CURRENTLY OPERATES TWO GOVERNMENT-OWNED SATELLITES, LANDSATS-7 AND -8, BOTH DEVELOPED BY NASA FOR USGS. TO FURTHER INFORM AGENCIES AS TO THE POTENTIAL FUTURE IMPLEMENTATIONS WITHIN THE SLI PROGRAM, A STUDY CONTRACT WITH MULTIPLE POTENTIAL AWARDS WILL BE ISSUED TO INVESTIGATE POTENTIAL BUSINESS MODELS FOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION. THE NASA SUSTAINABLE LAND IMAGING (SLI) OFFICE IS INVESTIGATING THE POTENTIAL USE OF INNOVATIVE BUSINESS MODELS TO REDUCE THE COSTS OF FUTURE LAND IMAGING MISSIONS. THE 2014 ARCHITECTURE STUDY BY THE SLI ARCHITECTURE STUDY TEAM (AST) PROVIDED SOME AGGREGATED EVIDENCE THAT SATELLITES DEVELOPED FOR COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES AND SATELLITES DEVELOPED UNDER NASA CONTRACTS TENDED TO HAVE COMPARABLE OVERALL RELIABILITY. THE STUDY ALSO PROVIDED SOME EVIDENCE THAT COMPARABLE COMMERCIAL SATELLITES TENDED TO BE LOWER IN COST THAN GOVERNMENT SPONSORED SATELLITES. THIS STUDY IS MOTIVATED BY THESE PRELIMINARY FINDINGS TO EXPLORE THEIR VERACITY AND CONSIDER THE IMPLICATIONS FOR SLI SPACE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT. THIS STUDY FOCUSES PRIMARILY ON THE DEVELOPMENT/ACQUISITION OF SPACECRAFT BUSES AND RELATED SERVICES; SOME ASPECTS OF THE STUDY ALSO INVOLVE CONSIDERATION OF OBSERVATORY INTEGRATION AND TEST, LAUNCH, GROUND SYSTEMS, AND MISSION OPERATIONS. FOR THIS STUDY, IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE GOVERNMENT WILL ACQUIRE SCIENCE PAYLOAD INSTRUMENTS INDEPENDENTLY FROM ACQUISITION OF THE SPACECRAFT BUS, EITHER VIA DIRECT CONTRACT TO INDUSTRY OR BY IN-HOUSE DEVELOPMENT AT A NASA CENTER, AND THEN PROVIDE THEM TO THE SPACECRAFT BUS DEVELOPER FOR INTEGRATION ONTO THE OBSERVATORY; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT/ACQUISITION IS NOT A FOCUS OF THIS STUDY.
    contract · Last action 2015-05-11
    $150,000
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF HOSTED PAYLOAD SOLUTION (HOPS) DELIVERY ORDER 0001 STUDY
    contract · Last action 2014-08-04
    $99,858
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF TROPOSPHERIC EMISSIONS: MONITORING OF POLLUTION FOLLOW-ON STUDY
    contract · Last action 2016-04-06
    $50,000
  • Department of Defense
    CAPABILITIES BRIEFING AND KICK-OFF
    contract · Last action 2021-06-24
    $10,000
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    RAPID III SPACECRAFT CONTRACT DATABASE AND CATALOG SETUP
    contract · Last action 2016-09-26
    $10,000
  • Department of Defense
    CONCEPTUAL STUDIES AND PRELIMINARY PRESEARCH IN THE AREAS OF OFFENSIVE SPACE CONTROL, DEFENSIVE SPACE CONTROL, COMMAND AND CONTROL, AND SPACE DOMAIN AWARENESS
    contract · Last action 2021-03-16
    $3,500
  • Department of Defense
    CONCEPTUAL STUDIES AND PRELIMINARY RESEARCH IN THE AREAS OF OFFENSIVE SPACE CONTROL, DEFENSIVE SPACE CONTROL, COMMAND AND CONTROL, AND SPACE DOMAIN AWARENESS
    contract · Last action 2025-09-18
    $0

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 334220 - RADIO AND TELEVISION BROADCASTING AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING. Last action: 2026-04-01. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2024-10-24Complaint2—$560
2013-12-03Unprogrammed Related1—$300

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

THE BOEING COMPANY is one of 297 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Boeing Co.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Boeing Co across all 297 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in aircraft manufacturing within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Boeing Co, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on THE BOEING COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Boeing Co, which operates 297 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is THE BOEING COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
THE BOEING COMPANY has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 3 violations and $860 in total penalties.
How does THE BOEING COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
THE BOEING COMPANY operates in the aircraft manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2. THE BOEING COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.4.