Skip to main content

Establishment profile

THE BOEING COMPANY

499 BOEING BLVD SW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35824
Operated by Boeing Co · 1 of 297 establishments
336414Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 35 years
Violations
0
Penalties
$0
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections · 3 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

THE BOEING COMPANY has accumulated 0 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 35 years of recorded history.

The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 9 years ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

THE BOEING COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 35 yrs
Violations
0
0.0 / yr
Penalties
$0
Inspection trigger · planned
1 of 2

Peer comparison

0th

Fewer violations than most other employers in NAICS 3364 within AL. Peer group: 36 employers. This establishment has 0 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
0th
peer median: $1,650
Inspection frequency
69th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
0.6
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.4
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
9 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 9+ years. Most recent activity: 9 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in AL — for Boeing Co, not this location alone

Total cases
3
Unfair labor practice
3

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Boeing Co locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 3 cases · 3 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
10-CA-326432Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038921Unfair labor practiceApr 2011Jun 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-038604Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for THE BOEING COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$19.7B
Obligated (all-time)
$34.7B
Awards
158
Top agency
Department of Defense
$20.0B
Company-wide — THE BOEING COMPANY (across 35 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$98.4B
Obligated (all-time)
$126.5B
Awards (all-time)
3,295

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Top agencies by obligation (this location)
Department of Defense$20.0B
National Aeronautics and Space Administration$14.6B
Department of Transportation$20.4M
Department of the Treasury$2.2M
Department of Homeland Security$1.4M
Largest awards (top 50 of 158)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    PROVIDE DEVELOPMENTAL HARDWARE AND TEST ARTICLES, AND MANUFACTURE AND ASSEMBLE ARES I UPPER STAGES. THE UPPER STAGE (US) ELEMENT IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE AND PROVIDES THE SECOND STAGE OF FLIGHT. THE US ELEMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROLL CONTROL DURING THE FIRST STAGE BURN AND SEPARATION; AND WILL PROVIDE THE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION, COMMAND AND DATA HANDLING, AND OTHER AVIONICS FUNCTIONS FOR THE ARES I DURING ALL PHASES OF THE ASCENT FLIGHT. THE US ELEMENT IS A NEW DESIGN THAT EMPHASIZES SAFETY, OPERABILITY, AND MINIMUM LIFE CYCLE COST. THE OVERALL DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION (DDT&E), PRODUCTION, AND SUSTAINING ENGINEERING EFFORTS INCLUDE ACTIVITIES PERFORMED BY THREE ORGANIZATIONS; THE NASA DESIGN TEAM (NDT), THE UPPER STAGE PRODUCTION CONTRACTOR (USPC) AND THE INSTRUMENT UNIT PRODUCTION CONTRACTOR (IUPC). FOR CLARITY, THE USPC WILL BE REFERRED TO AS THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THIS DOCUMENT. NASA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE PRIMARY ELEMENTS OF THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE INCLUDING: THE FIRST STAGE, US INCLUDING INSTRUMENT UNIT (IU), AND US ENGINE; AND WILL ALSO INTEGRATE THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE AT THE LAUNCH SITE. NASA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DDT&E, INCLUDING TECHNICAL AND PROGRAMMATIC INTEGRATION OF THE US SUBSYSTEMS AND GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY. NASA WILL LEAD THE EFFORT TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE US ELEMENT, THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS, AND ALL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION, INITIAL MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY PROCESS PLANNING, LOGISTICS PLANNING, AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT PLANNING. DEVELOPMENT, QUALIFICATION, AND ACCEPTANCE TESTING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY NASA AND THE CONTRACTOR TO SATISFY REQUIREMENTS AND FOR RISK MITIGATION. NASA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OVERALL UPPER STAGE VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PROCESS AND WILL REQUIRE SUPPORT FROM THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANUFACTURE AND ASSEMBLY OF THE UPPER STAGE TEST FLIGHT AND OPERATIONAL UPPER STAGE UNITS INCLUDING THE INSTALLATION OF UPPER STAGE INSTRUMENT UNIT, THE GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED US ENGINE, BOOSTER SEPARATION MOTORS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY. A DESCRIPTION OF THE NASA MANAGED AND PERFORMED EFFORTS IS CONTAINED IN THE US WORK PACKAGES AND WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE NDT, IUPC, AND CONTRACTOR DURING THE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATION OF THE US ELEMENT. THE US CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DESCRIBED IN THE USO-CLV-SE-25704 US DESIGN DEFINITION DOCUMENT (DDD) IS THE BASELINE DESIGN FOR THIS CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTORS EARLY ROLE WILL BE TO PROVIDE PRODUCIBILITY ENGINEERING SUPPORT TO NASA VIA THE ESTABLISHED US OFFICE STRUCTURE AND TO PROVIDE INPUTS INTO THE FINAL DESIGN CONFIGURATION, SPECIFICATIONS, AND STANDARDS. NASA WILL TRANSITION THE MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY, LOGISTICS SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, AND THE SUSTAINING ENGINEERING FUNCTIONS TO THE CONTRACTOR AT THE KEY POINTS DURING THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM CURRENTLY PLANNED TO OCCUR NO LATER THAN 90 DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE FOLLOWING MAJOR MILESTONES: MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLY US PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW (PDR) LOGISTICS SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE US PDR CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT US CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW CDR) SUSTAINING ENGINEERING US DESIGN CERTIFICATION REVIEW (DCR) AFTER THE COMPLETION OF AN ORDERLY TRANSITION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE CONTRACTOR, NASA WILL ASSUME AN INSIGHT ROLE INTO THE CONTRACTORS PRODUCTION, SUSTAINING ENGINEERING, AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT OF THE ARES I US TEST PROGRAM AND FLIGHT HARDWARE. AFTER DCR, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUSTAINING ENGINEERING PER SOW SECTION 4.7, AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN AND SUPPORT THE US CONFIGURATION AND FOR PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT.
    contract · Last action 2026-06-25
    $10,513,304,426
  • Department of Defense
    THE MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY (MDA), GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE (GMD) DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINMENT CONTRACT (DSC) THE GMD DSC WORK INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: 1) FUTURE DEVELOPMENT; 2) FIELDING; 3) TEST; 4) SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INTEGRATION AND CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT; 5) EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING AND REFURBISHMENT; 6) TRAINING; AND 7) OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT FOR THE GMD WEAPON SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORT FACILITIES.
    contract · Last action 2025-11-13
    $6,466,627,868
  • Department of Defense
    200112!000108!9700!ZD60 !BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORG. !HQ000601C0001 !A!N!*!N! !20001222!20080930!848025649!848025649!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !3370 E MIRALOMA AVE !ANAHEIM !CA!92806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000383571022!N!N!000000000000!AD93!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-ADV TECH DEV !S1 !SERVICES !1CAA!BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYS !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !U!R!2!001!B! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $4,831,224,742
  • Department of Defense
    GBI/AUR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SYSTEMS ENG
    contract · Last action 2026-03-23
    $4,442,838,457
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM (SLS) STAGES PRODUCTION AND EVOLUTION CONTRACT (SPEC)
    contract · Last action 2026-06-30
    $2,593,215,439
  • Department of Defense
    LETTER CONTRACT TO BOEING
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $1,334,833,191
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    INTERIM CRYOGENIC PROPULSION STAGE FOR SLS
    contract · Last action 2026-06-29
    $1,287,720,376
  • Department of Defense
    MAINTENANCE SUPPORT - CY09
    contract · Last action 2019-04-04
    $730,253,823
  • Department of Defense
    ELEMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING
    contract · Last action 2026-03-20
    $354,555,749
  • Department of Defense
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2025-09-03
    $346,662,384
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETTERENT TECHNOLOGY MATURATION AND RISK REDUCTION
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $261,115,400
  • Department of Defense
    ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING PHASE FOR THE ENHANCED MEDIUM ALTITUDE RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (EMARSS), RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TO PRODUCE FOUR EMD EMARSS UNITS WITH OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL EMD UNITS AND LRIP UNITS AND ICLS SUPPORT.
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $218,820,279
  • Department of Defense
    GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE READINESS
    contract · Last action 2026-04-01
    $216,078,122
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    ARES I UPPER STAGE INSTRUMENT UNIT AVIONICS DEVELOPMENT. THE UPPER STAGE (US) ELEMENT IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE AND PROVIDES THE SECOND STAGE OF FLIGHT. THE US ES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROLL CONTROL DURING THE FIRST STAGE BURN AND SEPARATION AND WILL PROVIDE THE GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION, COMMAND AND DATA HANDLING, AND OTHER AVIONICS FUNCTIONS FOR THE ARES I DURING ALL PHASES OF THE ASCENT FLIGHT. THE US IS A NEW DESIGN THAT EMPHASIZES SAFETY, OPERABILITY, AND MINIMUM LIFE-CYCLE COST. THE OVERALL DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION (DDT&E), PRODUCTION, AND SUSTAINING ENGINEERING EFFORTS INCLUDE ACTIVITIES PERFORMED BY THREE ORGANIZATIONS: THE NASA DESIGN TEAM (NDT), THE UPPER STAGE PRODUCTION CONTRACTOR (USPC) AND THE INSTRUMENT UNIT AVIONICS CONTRACTOR (IUAC). THE USPC WAS SELECTED VIA A SEPARATE ACQUISITION. NASA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INTEGRATION OF THE PRIMARY ELEMENTS OF THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE INCLUDING: THE FIRST STAGE, US INCLUDING INSTRUMENT UNIT (IU), US ENGINE, AND ORION AND WILL ALSO INTEGRATE THE ARES I LAUNCH VEHICLE AT THE LAUNCH SITE. THE US AVIONICS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND SPECIFICATIONS WILL BE DEVELOPED BY THE NASA MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER (MSFC) LED TEAM, IN CONJUNCTION WITH GLENN RESEARCH CENTER (GRC), AMES RESEARCH CENTER (ARC), AND KENNEDY SPACE CENTER (KSC). THE NDT IS COMPOSED OF BOTH GOVERNMENT CIVIL SERVANTS AND SUPPORT CONTRACTORS FROM EACH OF THE AFOREMENTIONED CENTERS. THE NDTS AVIONICS AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH IS DOCUMENTED IN USO-CLV-DE-25106, UPPER STAGE AVIONICS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE INSTRUMENT UNIT (IU) WILL HOUSE THE MAJORITY OF THE ARES I US AVIONICS. A SMALLER SET OF ELECTRONICS AND CABLE HARNESSES WILL BE LOCATED ON THE US CORE STRUCTURE AND INTERSTAGE STRUCTURE. THE US CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DESCRIBED IN THE USO-CLV-SE-25704 US DESIGN DEFINITION DOCUMENT (DDD) IS THE BASELINE VEHICLE DESIGN. THE ARES I US AVIONICS AND SOFTWARE SUBSYSTEM SPECIFICATION (USO-CLV-DE-25107), THE ELECTRICAL GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (EGSE) SUBSYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION (USO-CLV-DE-25135), AND THE ARES I US AVIONICS AND SOFTWARE COMPONENT END ITEM (CEI) SPECIFICATIONS (USO-CLV-DE-25107), LISTED IN SECTION 5, WILL SERVE AS THE SOURCE FOR TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTRACTOR. THIS IS A COST PLUS AWARD FEE (CPAF) TYPE OF CONTRACT AND FEE FOR CLINS 1 AND 2 IS EARNED BASED ON THE AWARD FEE SCORE GIVEN AT THE END OF EACH AWARD FEE PERIOD. FEE FOR CLINS 1 AND 2 ARE EVALUATED UNDER NASA FAR SUPPLEMENT (NFS) CLAUSE 1852.216-76, AWARD FEE FOR SERVICE CONTRACTS. THE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE AWARD FEE SHOWN IN TABLE 3 OF PARAGRAPH 1.4, BELOW, IS SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT BASED ON IDIQ WORK AUTHORIZED UNDER CLIN 2. ADDITIONALLY, THE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE AWARD FEE IN EACH PERIOD IS SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENTS ARISING FROM CHANGES OR OTHER CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS.
    contract · Last action 2012-05-24
    $196,330,000
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF CORE MET-I TECHNICAL SE&I REQUIREMENTS
    contract · Last action 2024-09-11
    $145,734,251
  • Department of Defense
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2026-03-26
    $132,034,434
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF THE TASKING OF MET-I CORE [MDA/DE] SYSTEMS ENGINEERING&INTEGRATION (SE&I) REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE BMDS.
    contract · Last action 2021-04-19
    $104,236,465
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::CT::IGF BASELINE ENGINEERING
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $89,894,852
  • Department of Defense
    THE MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY (MDA) WILL ACQUIRE THE NEXT GENERATION INTERCEPTOR FOR FIELDING IN 2020 AS AN ELEMENT OF THE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM (BMDS). THE NEXT GENERATION AEGIS MISSILE (NGAM) WILL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE EARLY INTERCEPT CAPABILITY AGAINST SOME SHORT RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILES (SRBM), ALL MEDIUM RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILES (MRBM), ALL INTERMEDIATE RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILES (IRBM) AND NON-ADVANCED INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILES (ICBM) LAUNCHED FROM THE REGION WHERE AEGIS WEAPON SYSTEMS (AWS) (INCLUDING THE AEGIS BMD 5.1 AND MK 41 VERTICAL LAUNCHING SYSTEM (VLS)) ARE LOCATED. THE FIRST PHASE OF THIS ACQUISITION IS THE CONCEPT DEFINITION AND PROGRAM PLANNING PHASE BEGINNING IN 2011, TO BE FOLLOWED BY COMPETITIVE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PHASE IN FY13. THE PURPOSE OF THE CONCEPT DEFINITION AND PROGRAM PLANNING CONTRACTS ARE TO: 1) DEFINE DESIGN OBJECTIVES, 2) PRESENT TRADES TO MEET THAT CAPABILITY, AND 3) OPTIMIZE TRADES TO MINIMIZE COST, SCHEDULE, AND TECHNICAL RISKS. THE GOVERNMENT CONTEMPLATES THE COMPETITIVE AWARD OF UP TO THREE COST-PLUS FIXED-FEE (CPFF) CONTRACTS RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION, BUT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE FEWER THAN THREE AWARDS, MORE THAN THREE AWARDS, OR NO AWARD AT ALL.
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $48,365,208
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF NEXT GEN FOLLOW-ON STUDY
    contract · Last action 2024-09-11
    $40,253,351
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF MET-I PROGRAM MGMT&OPERATIONS (PMO)
    contract · Last action 2019-09-16
    $40,008,807
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF R&D - DISCRIMINATING SEEKER
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $33,329,531
  • Department of Defense
    AVENGER WEAPON SYSTEM IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2024-02-07
    $30,553,422
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF TASKING FOR MET-I ENGR PLANNING $ PMO FUNCTIONS
    contract · Last action 2017-03-06
    $24,063,963
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::CT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $23,700,000
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::OT::IGF BASIC - STUDIES/DESIGN
    contract · Last action 2015-05-14
    $15,457,448
  • Department of Defense
    COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE CONTRACT TYPE
    contract · Last action 2015-06-29
    $14,633,324
  • Department of Defense
    ENGINEERING SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2020-02-13
    $13,668,856
  • Department of Defense
    MULTI-OBJECT KILL VEHICLE (MOKV) PAYLOAD: CONCEPT DEFINITION AND RISK REDUCTION: IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $11,641,430
  • Department of Defense
    IGF::CL,CT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2023-08-14
    $10,553,076
  • Department of Defense
    HYPERSONIC DEFENSE COMPONENT TECHNOLOGY, SOW TITLED "TECHNOLOGY MATURATION OF A CAVITY FLOW SENSOR", RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    contract · Last action 2024-12-13
    $8,747,280
  • Department of Defense
    NEXT GENERATION OVERHEAD PERSISTENT INFRARED BLOCK 1 PAYLOAD PROTOTYPE.
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $8,429,908
  • Department of Transportation
    CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (CBP) BLOCK 1 C2 SOFTWARE SUSTAINMENT TAS::69 4562::TAS IGF::OT::IGF IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2015-09-10
    $5,049,344
  • Department of Defense
    AVENGER ENGINEERING SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2025-06-02
    $4,973,021
  • Department of Defense
    GLIDE BREAKER PHASE 2
    contract · Last action 2025-03-28
    $4,696,085
  • Department of Defense
    HYPERSONIC DEFENSE WEAPON SYSTEM, WHITE PAPER TITLED "HYPERVELOCITY INTERCEPTOR"
    contract · Last action 2020-06-11
    $4,356,864
  • Department of Defense
    200608!003571!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q06C0338 !A!N! !N! ! !20060531!20080930!126368257!126368257!009256819!N!THE BOEING COMPANY !499 BOEING BLVD SW !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35824!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000029950000!Y!N!000000000000!1290!MISCELLANEOUS FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !336411!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!001!B! !Z!N!A! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
    contract · Last action 2013-07-01
    $4,039,185
  • Department of Defense
    AVENGER ENGINEERING SERVICE
    contract · Last action 2023-09-26
    $3,883,537
  • Department of Defense
    SUGV-310 C-IED ROBOT
    contract · Last action 2010-12-09
    $3,849,600
  • Department of Defense
    PEO MISSILES AND SPACE AVENGER SOFTWARE SUSTAINMENT ACTIVITIES
    contract · Last action 2025-09-25
    $3,115,100
  • Department of Defense
    AVENGER ENGINEERING SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2026-04-02
    $3,050,178
  • Department of Transportation
    IGF::OT::IGF PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE SUSTAINMENT FOR CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SBINET BLOCK 1 SYSTEM
    contract · Last action 2019-01-11
    $2,980,489
  • Department of Transportation
    PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE SUSTAINMENT FOR CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SBINET BLOCK 1 SYSTEM TAS::69 4562::TAS IGF::OT::IGF IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2019-02-27
    $2,974,650
  • Department of Transportation
    CBP C2 SOFTWARE AND NOC/SOC SUSTAINMENT TAS::69 4562::TAS IGF::OT::IGF IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2014-03-14
    $2,596,697
  • Department of Transportation
    CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (CBP) C2 SOFTWARE SUSTAINMENT IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2018-12-18
    $2,563,172
  • Department of Defense
    AVENGER ENGINEERING SERVICES
    contract · Last action 2025-09-25
    $2,247,567
  • Department of the Treasury
    THE PURPOSE OF THIS FIRM FIXED PRICED PURCHASE ORDER IS TO PROCURE BRAND NAME BOEING MULTIMEDIA MESSAGE MANAGER (M3) MAINTENANCE SUPPORT.
    contract · Last action 2026-06-03
    $2,218,625
  • Department of Defense
    COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE CONTRACT TYPE
    contract · Last action 2013-05-16
    $1,625,141
  • Department of Transportation
    PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FOR THE CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SBINET BLOCK 1 C2 SYSTEM. TAS::69 4562::TAS IGF::OT::IGF IGF::OT::IGF
    contract · Last action 2019-01-25
    $1,585,392
  • Department of Defense
    PERFORMANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPOSAL SUBMITTED UNDER BAA TAS::97 0100::TAS
    contract · Last action 2024-06-18
    $1,492,970

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 336414 - GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE MANUFACTURING. Last action: 2026-06-30. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2017-02-16Unprogrammed Related0$0
1991-03-28Planned0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

THE BOEING COMPANY is one of 297 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Boeing Co.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Boeing Co across all 297 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing within AL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Boeing Co, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on THE BOEING COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Boeing Co, which operates 297 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is THE BOEING COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
THE BOEING COMPANY has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 0 violations and $0 in total penalties.
How does THE BOEING COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
THE BOEING COMPANY operates in the guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 0.6.