Establishment profile
CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.
121 RAND ST, MORGANTON, NC, 28655
311615 — Poultry Processing
Summary
CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. has accumulated 113 OSHA violations across 19 inspections over 32 years of recorded history, with $57,105 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 98th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 197 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 98th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 2 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and WHD wage enforcement records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
53% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 9 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 44 citations in this view · $29,987 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F04 | 3 | 3 | $6,746 | Jun 2003 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 3 | 3 | $3,306 | Jun 2003 | Nov 2015 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 3 | 3 | $2,404 | Jun 2003 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 9501.2901 | 3 | 3 | $1,473 | Jun 2003 | Oct 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 | 3 | 2 | $578 | Jun 2003 | Oct 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 F | 3 | 3 | — | Jun 2003 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G02 III | 3 | 3 | — | Mar 1994 | Oct 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 2 | 2 | $1,875 | Mar 1994 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0253 B04 III | 2 | 2 | $578 | Jun 2003 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 C01 | 2 | 2 | $528 | Jun 2003 | Oct 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0037 B02 | 2 | 2 | — | Jan 2011 | Nov 2015 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1026 D01 | 2 | 2 | — | Jan 2011 | Nov 2015 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B02 | 2 | 2 | — | Oct 2006 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 E01 I | 2 | 2 | — | Jun 2003 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0141 A04 I | 2 | 2 | — | Jun 2003 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1030 C01 IV | 2 | 2 | — | Oct 2006 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 B | 2 | 2 | — | Jun 2003 | Oct 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 F03 | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I | 1 | 1 | $3,750 | Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0254 D09 III | 1 | 1 | $3,750 | Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3116 within NC. Peer group: 197 employers. This establishment has 113 OSHA violations; peer median is 6.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 2+ years. Most recent activity: 2 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2022 – Sep 2022 | Chicken Egg Production | — | — | 0 | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-19 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2016-10-12 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2015-09-03 | Referral | 10 | 6 | $14,750 | |
| 2012-11-20 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2012-08-29 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2012-03-21 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2010-12-08 | Referral | 3 | 3 | $7,800 | |
| 2010-11-15 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2010-11-15 | Planned | 13 | 3 | $7,841 | |
| 2010-11-15 | Planned | 20 | 2 | $3,900 | |
| 2010-11-10 | Planned | 5 | — | $8,225 | |
| 2006-10-03 | Planned | 9 | 3 | $1,625 | |
| 2006-10-03 | Planned | 11 | 9 | $2,113 | |
| 2004-03-02 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2003-05-21 | Planned | 20 | 10 | $3,466 | |
| 2003-05-21 | Planned | 17 | 8 | $3,385 | |
| 1998-03-04 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1997-05-28 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1993-12-03 | Complaint | 5 | 3 | $4,000 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in poultry processing within NC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS, INC.ROSE HILL — 4 federal enforcement records
- PERDUE FARMS INCLEWISTON WOODVILLE — 3 federal enforcement records
- CASE FARMS, L.L.C.DUDLEY — 3 federal enforcement records
- MOUNTAIRE FARMS INC.LUMBER BRIDGE — 3 federal enforcement records
- CASE FARMS, INC.MORGANTON — 3 federal enforcement records
- PERDUE INC.LEWISTON — 3 federal enforcement records
- PERDUE FARMS INCFAYETTEVILLE — 2 federal enforcement records
- HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS, INC.TEACHEY — 2 federal enforcement records
- BUTTERBALL, LLCMOUNT OLIVE — 2 federal enforcement records
- House of RaefordWallace — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- Poultry ProcessingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in NCState-wide enforcement data
- Poultry Processing in NCIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. has 19 OSHA inspections on record with 113 violations and $57,105.2 in total penalties.
- How does CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. operates in the poultry processing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.4.