Skip to main content

Establishment profile

BAE SYSTEMS

11 ALBERIGI DRIVE, JESSUP, PA, 18434
Operated by BAE Systems · 1 of 23 establishments
339999All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 18 years
Violations
2
Penalties
$0
$0 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

BAE SYSTEMS has accumulated 2 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 18 years of recorded history.

The establishment sits in the 49th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 275 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 70th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 17 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

BAE SYSTEMS appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, NLRB labor relations, and UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 18 yrs
Violations
2
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$0
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 2

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 2 distinct standards shown · 2 citations in this view.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.1048 D0611Dec 2008Dec 2008
29 CFR 1910.1048 N0111Dec 2008Dec 2008

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

49th

Below average violations in NAICS 3399 within PA. Peer group: 275 employers. This establishment has 2 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
0th
peer median: $875
Inspection frequency
70th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.3
vs industry
−1.2
TRIR
0.6
vs industry
−1.9

Reported for 1,507 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.5
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.6
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
17 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 17+ years. Most recent activity: 17 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$8,360
Employees affected
208

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour breakdown by law

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 208 violations · $8,360 in backwages

StatutePeriodCasesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
FLSA — minimum wage & overtimeNov 20071208208$8,360

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 208 violations · $8,360 in backwages · 208 workers affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Nov 2005 – Nov 2007Plastics Material and Resin ManufacturingFLSA208208$8,360

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in PA — for BAE Systems, not this location alone

Total cases
31
Unfair labor practice
31

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other BAE Systems locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 31 cases · 31 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
05-CA-308656Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jan 2023ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-272934Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Mar 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-256737Unfair labor practiceFeb 2020Feb 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-256059Unfair labor practiceFeb 2020Jul 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-248905Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Apr 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-241453Unfair labor practiceMay 2019Jul 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-237481Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-237475Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-235565Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-234329Unfair labor practiceJan 2019Feb 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-221801Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-193580Unfair labor practiceFeb 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-190374Unfair labor practiceDec 2016Jun 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-190357Unfair labor practiceDec 2016Jun 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-189555Unfair labor practiceDec 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-187856Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Jan 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-187504Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-182568Unfair labor practiceAug 2016Jan 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-182561Unfair labor practiceAug 2016Jan 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-163341Unfair labor practiceNov 2015May 2016ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-163154Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-146766Unfair labor practiceFeb 2015May 2015ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-146276Unfair labor practiceFeb 2015Apr 2015ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-126254Unfair labor practiceApr 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-111114Unfair labor practiceAug 2013Aug 2013ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-087755Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Sep 2012ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-087754Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Sep 2012ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-085350Unfair labor practiceJul 2012Aug 2012ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-081970Unfair labor practiceMay 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-078506Unfair labor practiceApr 2012May 2012ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-078042Unfair labor practiceApr 2012Apr 2012ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

Prosecutions
1
Total payments
$400.0M
Disposition
Guilty Plea
Crime type
Import / Export

First case: 2010-03-02. Most recent: 2010-03-02. Source: UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry — federal pleas, DPAs, and NPAs.

Federal prosecution case file

Federal corporate prosecution records from the University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry. DPA = Deferred Prosecution Agreement; NPA = Non-Prosecution Agreement; both are pre-trial settlements where the defendant accepts terms but avoids conviction. Monitor = court-appointed compliance oversight, usually 2-5 years. 1 case · 1 plea/conviction · $400,000,000 in penalties / restitution.

CaseDateDispositionCrimeJurisdictionTotal paymentMonitor
USA v. BAE SYSTEMS PLC
BAE Systems plc · BAESF
Mar 2010pleaImport / ExportUSDOJ - Criminal Division,USDOJ - National Security Division$400,000,000No

Source: University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry (maintained by Prof. Brandon L. Garrett, Duke University). The registry has no state or jurisdiction-of-incorporation field on the company side, so same-name employers in different states may mis-attribute -- verify against the source case documents when precision matters.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2008-10-23Complaint2$0
2008-04-22Complaint0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

BAE SYSTEMS is one of 23 establishments rolled up under the parent organization BAE Systems.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of BAE Systems across all 23 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in all other miscellaneous manufacturing within PA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by BAE Systems, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on BAE SYSTEMS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup BAE Systems, which operates 23 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is BAE SYSTEMS's OSHA violation history?
BAE SYSTEMS has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 2 violations and $0 in total penalties.
How does BAE SYSTEMS's safety record compare to its industry?
BAE SYSTEMS operates in the all other miscellaneous manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.4. BAE SYSTEMS's self-reported DART rate is 0.27 compared to an industry average of 1.5.