Establishment profile
BAE SYSTEMS, INC.
1100 BAIRS ROAD, YORK, PA, 17408
Operated by BAE Systems · 1 of 20 establishments
336992 — Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing
Summary
BAE SYSTEMS, INC. has accumulated 11 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 15 years of recorded history, with $19,500 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 83rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 24 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 87th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.
Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
BAE SYSTEMS, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, NLRB labor relations, and UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
60% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 11 distinct standards shown · 11 citations in this view · $19,500 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Feb 2013 | Feb 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 A04 | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Feb 2012 | Feb 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1027 L01 IV | 1 | 1 | $4,250 | Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1027 M01 III | 1 | 1 | $4,250 | Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0029 B01 | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Feb 2013 | Feb 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1027 M04 II | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1027 L02 II B 3 | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I | 1 | 1 | — | Feb 2013 | Feb 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I | 1 | 1 | — | Feb 2013 | Feb 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 A05 | 1 | 1 | — | Feb 2012 | Feb 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 L04 III | 1 | 1 | — | Feb 2012 | Feb 2012 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3369 within PA. Peer group: 24 employers. This establishment has 11 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 1,507 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Mar 2015
Most frequent event: Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects, n.e.c.
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2015 | Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects, n.e.c. | Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c. | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2010 | PLATFORM,HEAD,HYDRAULIC LIFT,MAINTENANCE,PINNED,CAUGHT BETWEEN,CRUSHED,DOOR,DOOR MACHINEFatality | 1 | — | 1 |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 2 violations · $0 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMLA (family & medical leave) | Jul 2016 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 2 violations · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2016 – Jul 2016 | All Other Specialty Trade Contractors | FMLA | 2 | 1 | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for BAE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in PA — for BAE Systems, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other BAE Systems locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 31 cases · 31 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05-CA-308656 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2022 | Jan 2023 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-272934 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2021 | Mar 2021 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-256737 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-256059 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2020 | Jul 2021 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-248905 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 2019 | Apr 2022 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-241453 | Unfair labor practice | May 2019 | Jul 2021 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-237481 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2019 | Apr 2019 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-237475 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2019 | Mar 2019 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-235565 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2019 | Apr 2019 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-234329 | Unfair labor practice | Jan 2019 | Feb 2019 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-221801 | Unfair labor practice | May 2018 | Aug 2018 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-193580 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2017 | Dec 2017 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-190374 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2016 | Jun 2017 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-190357 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2016 | Jun 2017 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-189555 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2016 | Dec 2016 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-187856 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2016 | Jan 2017 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-187504 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2016 | Dec 2016 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-182568 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2016 | Jan 2017 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-182561 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2016 | Jan 2017 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-163341 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2015 | May 2016 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-163154 | Unfair labor practice | Oct 2015 | Dec 2015 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-146766 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2015 | May 2015 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-146276 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2015 | Apr 2015 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-126254 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2014 | May 2014 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-111114 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2013 | Aug 2013 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-087755 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2012 | Sep 2012 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-087754 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2012 | Sep 2012 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-085350 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2012 | Aug 2012 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-081970 | Unfair labor practice | May 2012 | Jul 2012 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-078506 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2012 | May 2012 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
| 05-CA-078042 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2012 | Apr 2012 | Closed | Region 05, Baltimore, Maryland |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for BAE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for BAE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
First case: 2010-03-02. Most recent: 2010-03-02. Source: UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry — federal pleas, DPAs, and NPAs.
Federal prosecution case file
Federal corporate prosecution records from the University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry. DPA = Deferred Prosecution Agreement; NPA = Non-Prosecution Agreement; both are pre-trial settlements where the defendant accepts terms but avoids conviction. Monitor = court-appointed compliance oversight, usually 2-5 years. 1 case · 1 plea/conviction · $400,000,000 in penalties / restitution.
| Case | Date | Disposition | Crime | Jurisdiction | Total payment | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USA v. BAE SYSTEMS PLC BAE Systems plc · BAESF | Mar 2010 | plea | Import / Export | USDOJ - Criminal Division,USDOJ - National Security Division | $400,000,000 | No |
Source: University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry (maintained by Prof. Brandon L. Garrett, Duke University). The registry has no state or jurisdiction-of-incorporation field on the company side, so same-name employers in different states may mis-attribute -- verify against the source case documents when precision matters.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2013-04-16 | Complaint | 4 | 2 | $8,500 | |
| 2012-08-15 | Referral | 4 | — | $6,000 | |
| 2012-01-10 | Complaint | 3 | — | $5,000 | |
| 2010-10-13 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
BAE SYSTEMS, INC. is one of 20 establishments rolled up under the parent organization BAE Systems.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of BAE Systems across all 20 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in military armored vehicle, tank, and tank component manufacturing within PA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- BAE SYSTEMSLEMONT FURNACE — 2 federal enforcement records
- GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS, INC.EYNON — 2 federal enforcement records
- KONGSBERG PROTECH SYSTEMS USAJOHNSTOWN — 1 federal enforcement record
- BAE SYSTEMSYORK — 1 federal enforcement record
- BAE SYSTEMS - LAND AND ARMAMENTS, LPYORK — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by BAE Systems, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- BAE SYSTEMSSAN DIEGO, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMSJESSUP, PA — 3 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMSPALMDALE, CA — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMS, INC.MOJAVE, CA — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMS, INC.CORDOVA, AL — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMSSANTA CLARA, CA — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMS NORFOLK SHIP REPAIRNORFOLK, VA — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMSLEMONT FURNACE, PA — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMSANNISTON, AL — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAE SYSTEMS, INC.ANNISTON, AL — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All BAE Systems locationsParent rollup
- Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in PAState-wide enforcement data
- Military Armored Vehicle, in PAIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on BAE SYSTEMS, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup BAE Systems, which operates 20 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is BAE SYSTEMS, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- BAE SYSTEMS, INC. has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 11 violations and $19,500 in total penalties.
- How does BAE SYSTEMS, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- BAE SYSTEMS, INC. operates in the military armored vehicle, tank, and tank component manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.9. BAE SYSTEMS, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0.27 compared to an industry average of 1.8.
- Has BAE SYSTEMS, INC. had any workplace fatalities?
- Yes. Federal records show 1 fatality investigation involving BAE SYSTEMS, INC..