Skip to main content

Establishment profile

BAE SYSTEMS

USS BOXER (PIER) PRIDE OF CALIFORNIA, 2205 BELT STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92113
Operated by BAE Systems · 1 of 23 establishments
336611Ship Building and Repairing
EIN 541693796

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
11
over 19 years
Violations
1
$13,494 in penalties
Penalties
$13,494
$13,494 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 hospitalizations · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

BAE SYSTEMS has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 11 inspections over 19 years of recorded history, with $13,494 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 23rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 344 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 96th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 5 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

BAE SYSTEMS appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, and UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
11
0.6 / yr · last 19 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$13,494
$13,494 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · planned
8 of 11
Inspection trigger · referral
2 of 11

9% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $13,494 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0028 B03 I11$13,494May 2020May 2020

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

23rd

Below average violations in NAICS 3366 within CA. Peer group: 344 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
82nd
peer median: $1,746
Inspection frequency
96th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
10.5
vs industry
+7.3
TRIR
10.5
vs industry
+5.7

Reported for 19 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.8
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
3.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
10.5
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
8
Accident
1
Referral
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Mar 2015

Reports
1
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Other fall to lower level 26 to 30 feet

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed). 100% of this employer's reports came from a state-plan program.

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Mar 10, 2015Other fall to lower level 26 to 30 feetAnkle(s)Hospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Jan 14, 2020Blunt force trauma,Fall,Fall From Elevation,Fracture,Head,Slid,Spine,Subdural Hematoma11

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
5 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 5+ years. Most recent activity: 5 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for BAE Systems, not this location alone

Total cases
6
Unfair labor practice
6

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other BAE Systems locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 6 cases · 6 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
32-CA-360037Unfair labor practiceFeb 2025OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-112211Unfair labor practiceAug 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-035296Unfair labor practiceOct 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-035264Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034965Unfair labor practiceMar 2010May 2010ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034050Unfair labor practiceJul 2008Oct 2008ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
2
Quarters non-compliant
9

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
BAE SYSTEMS
2205 E BELT ST · SAN DIEGO, CA, 92113
AirWaterRCRANo Violation Identified
QNCR 9
20Sep 2025View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

Prosecutions
1
Total payments
$400.0M
Disposition
Guilty Plea
Crime type
Import / Export

First case: 2010-03-02. Most recent: 2010-03-02. Source: UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry — federal pleas, DPAs, and NPAs.

Federal prosecution case file

Federal corporate prosecution records from the University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry. DPA = Deferred Prosecution Agreement; NPA = Non-Prosecution Agreement; both are pre-trial settlements where the defendant accepts terms but avoids conviction. Monitor = court-appointed compliance oversight, usually 2-5 years. 1 case · 1 plea/conviction · $400,000,000 in penalties / restitution.

CaseDateDispositionCrimeJurisdictionTotal paymentMonitor
USA v. BAE SYSTEMS PLC
BAE Systems plc · BAESF
Mar 2010pleaImport / ExportUSDOJ - Criminal Division,USDOJ - National Security Division$400,000,000No

Source: University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry (maintained by Prof. Brandon L. Garrett, Duke University). The registry has no state or jurisdiction-of-incorporation field on the company side, so same-name employers in different states may mis-attribute -- verify against the source case documents when precision matters.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2021-05-25Referral0$0
2021-05-10Accident0$0
2020-01-27Referral1$13,494
2012-01-05Planned0$0
2011-11-15Planned0$0
2011-01-14Planned0$0
2010-10-08Planned0$0
2010-06-21Planned0$0
2010-01-07Planned0$0
2009-11-24Planned0$0
2007-03-14Planned0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

BAE SYSTEMS is one of 23 establishments rolled up under the parent organization BAE Systems.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of BAE Systems across all 23 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in ship building and repairing within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by BAE Systems, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on BAE SYSTEMS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup BAE Systems, which operates 23 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is BAE SYSTEMS's OSHA violation history?
BAE SYSTEMS has 11 OSHA inspections on record with 1 violation and $13,494 in total penalties.
How does BAE SYSTEMS's safety record compare to its industry?
BAE SYSTEMS operates in the ship building and repairing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.8. BAE SYSTEMS's self-reported DART rate is 10.49 compared to an industry average of 3.2.