Skip to main content

Establishment profile

BAE SYSTEMS

750 W. BERKLEY AVE., NORFOLK, VA, 23523
Operated by BAE Systems, Inc · 1 of 8 establishments
336611Ship Building and Repairing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 14 years
Violations
1
$3,750 in penalties
Penalties
$3,750
$3,750 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

BAE SYSTEMS has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 2 inspections over 14 years of recorded history, with $3,750 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 45th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 668 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 61st percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

BAE SYSTEMS appears in OSHA workplace safety, NLRB labor relations, and UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 14 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$3,750
$3,750 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · referral
1 of 2
Inspection trigger · planned
1 of 2

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Peer comparison

45th

Below average violations in NAICS 3366 within VA. Peer group: 668 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
79th
peer median: $175
Inspection frequency
61st
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
2.9
vs industry
−0.4
TRIR
5.6
vs industry
+0.8

Reported for 1,082 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.8
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
3.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
5.6
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Referral
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jan 2015 – Mar 2015

Reports
3
Hospitalizations
3
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Bodily conditions, n.e.c.

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed). 100% of this employer's reports came from a state-plan program.

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Mar 19, 2015Bodily conditions, n.e.c.BODY SYSTEMSHospitalized
Jan 29, 2015Fall on same level due to tripping on uneven surfaceNonclassifiableHospitalized
Jan 18, 2015Caught in running equipment or machinery, unspecifiedHand(s), n.e.c.Hospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
11 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 11+ years. Most recent activity: 11 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in VA — for BAE Systems, Inc, not this location alone

Total cases
23
Unfair labor practice
23

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other BAE Systems, Inc locations in the same state.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC)

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for BAE SYSTEMS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

Prosecutions
1
Total payments
$400.0M
Disposition
Guilty Plea
Crime type
Import / Export

First case: 2010-03-02. Most recent: 2010-03-02. Source: UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry — federal pleas, DPAs, and NPAs.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2015-01-20Referral1$3,750
2011-12-14Planned0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

BAE SYSTEMS is one of 8 establishments rolled up under the parent organization BAE Systems, Inc.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of BAE Systems, Inc across all 8 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in ship building and repairing within VA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by BAE Systems, Inc, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on BAE SYSTEMS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup BAE Systems, Inc, which operates 8 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Frequently asked

What is BAE SYSTEMS's OSHA violation history?
BAE SYSTEMS has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 1 violation and $3,750 in total penalties.
How does BAE SYSTEMS's safety record compare to its industry?
BAE SYSTEMS operates in the ship building and repairing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.8. BAE SYSTEMS's self-reported DART rate is 2.85 compared to an industry average of 3.2.