Establishment profile
ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.
41738 ESTERLY DR., COLUMBIANA, OH, 44408
331313 — Alumina Refining and Primary Aluminum Production
EIN 475141785
Summary
ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC. has accumulated 51 OSHA violations across 6 inspections over 9 years of recorded history, with $124,912 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 93rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 71 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 74th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC. appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
83% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 5 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 25 citations in this view · $101,483 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0101 B | 2 | 2 | $12,959 | Jun 2017 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H03 IV | 2 | 2 | $4,268 | Jun 2017 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 D02 | 2 | 2 | — | Jun 2017 | Feb 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 F01 | 2 | 2 | — | Jun 2018 | Feb 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0253 B04 III | 2 | 2 | — | Jun 2017 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 A | 1 | 1 | $11,585 | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 L01 I | 1 | 1 | $8,276 | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H01 | 1 | 1 | $8,276 | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 G01 | 1 | 1 | $6,615 | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 1 | 1 | $4,980 | Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 I | 1 | 1 | $4,980 | Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 IV A | 1 | 1 | $4,980 | Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | $4,980 | Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0095 D01 | 1 | 1 | $4,980 | Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A02 | 1 | 1 | $4,641 | Sep 2019 | Sep 2019 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 A | 1 | 1 | $4,268 | Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 D02 | 1 | 1 | $4,268 | Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 C | 1 | 1 | $4,268 | Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0039 A02 | 1 | 1 | $3,978 | Sep 2019 | Sep 2019 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I B | 1 | 1 | $3,182 | Sep 2019 | Sep 2019 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3313 within OH. Peer group: 71 employers. This establishment has 51 OSHA violations; peer median is 9.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 60 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · May 2019
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2019 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation | Finger(s), fingernail(s), unspecified | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019 | Amputated,Amputation,Caught Between,Caught In,Crushed,Finger,Hand,Laceration,Machine operator,Partial Amputation,Power Press,Power Roller,Press Operator,Roller--Mach/Part,Struck By,Thumb,Training,Unguarded | 1 | 1 | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-13 | Referral | 11 | 7 | $34,752 | |
| 2023-09-06 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2019-05-20 | Referral | 8 | 7 | $18,962 | |
| 2018-01-11 | Referral | 8 | 8 | $22,053 | |
| 2018-01-03 | Complaint | 12 | 8 | $34,145 | |
| 2017-05-09 | Complaint | 12 | 10 | $15,000 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in alumina refining and primary aluminum production within OH, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- IMPERIAL ALUMINUM - MINERVA LLCMINERVA — 2 federal enforcement records
- KAISER ALUMINUMHEATH — 2 federal enforcement records
- TRI-CAST LTD.AKRON — 2 federal enforcement records
- STAR EXTRUDED SHAPES, INC.CANFIELD — 2 federal enforcement records
- ALUCHEM, INC.CINCINNATI — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Alumina Refining and Primary Aluminum ProductionAll employers in this industry
- Employers in OHState-wide enforcement data
- Alumina Refining and in OHIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.'s OSHA violation history?
- ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC. has 6 OSHA inspections on record with 51 violations and $124,911.7 in total penalties.
- How does ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC. operates in the alumina refining and primary aluminum production industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.1. ZARBANA ALUMINUM EXTRUSION, LLC.'s self-reported DART rate is 5.58 compared to an industry average of 1.3.