Skip to main content

Establishment profile

THE NEW YORK TIMES

ONE NEW YORK TIMES PLAZA, FLUSHING, NY, 11354
Operated by The New York Times · 1 of 5 establishments
511110Newspaper Publishers

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 26 years
Violations
15
$8,438 in penalties
Penalties
$8,438
$563 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

THE NEW YORK TIMES has accumulated 15 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 26 years of recorded history, with $8,438 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 96th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 82 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 80th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 17 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

THE NEW YORK TIMES appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 26 yrs
Violations
15
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$8,438
$563 avg / violation
100% serious0% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 2

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 15 distinct standards shown · 15 citations in this view · $8,438 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0307 B11$1,875Sep 2008Sep 2008
29 CFR 1910.0022 A0111$1,875Sep 2008Sep 2008
29 CFR 1910.0132 F0111$938Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1052 L0111$938Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.0132 D0111$938Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1052 H0111$938Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1052 D01 I11$938Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 G02 X11Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 H0111Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1052 L03 I11Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1052 L03 II11Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 E0111Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 G02 IV11Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 G02 V11Dec 1999Dec 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 G02 VI11Dec 1999Dec 1999

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

96th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 5111 within NY. Peer group: 82 employers. This establishment has 15 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
86th
peer median: $700
Inspection frequency
80th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
4.8
vs industry
+4.2
TRIR
7.2
vs industry
+6.4

Reported for 669 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
0.8
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.6
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
7.2
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for THE NEW YORK TIMES. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
17 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 17+ years. Most recent activity: 17 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for THE NEW YORK TIMES. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for THE NEW YORK TIMES. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in NY — for The New York Times, not this location alone

Total cases
47
Unfair labor practice
44
Representation (union)
2

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other The New York Times locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 47 cases · 44 ULP · 2 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
02-CA-388333Unfair labor practiceMay 2026OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-387872Unfair labor practiceMay 2026OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-358026Unfair labor practiceJan 2025OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-RC-357904Representation electionJan 2025OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-UC-354185UCNov 2024OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-352678Unfair labor practiceOct 2024OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-352664Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-343109Unfair labor practiceMay 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-337184Unfair labor practiceFeb 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-324466Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Oct 2024ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-323953Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-323471Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-320152Unfair labor practiceJun 2023May 2024ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-315211Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-315209Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-310421Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-308808Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-308788Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-295918Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jan 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-295819Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-292360Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-290984Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-290964Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-290396Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-289497Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Mar 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-286106Unfair labor practiceNov 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-284871Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-281124Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Nov 2021ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-RC-280769Representation electionAug 2021Mar 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-278244Unfair labor practiceJun 2021May 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-273247Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-253569Unfair labor practiceDec 2019Feb 2020ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-236047Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-230979Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-230930Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-225668Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-191717Unfair labor practiceJan 2017Apr 2017ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-144030Unfair labor practiceJan 2015May 2015ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-126809Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-120788Unfair labor practiceJan 2014Apr 2014ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-119815Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Mar 2014ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-109323Unfair labor practiceJul 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-040222Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Jan 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-039968Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Nov 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-039967Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Nov 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-038222Unfair labor practiceApr 2007Jun 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-035440Unfair labor practiceApr 2003Aug 2003ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for THE NEW YORK TIMES. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
0
Quarters non-compliant
4

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: Violation Identified.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
THE NEW YORK TIMES
2570 WHITESTONE EXPY · FLUSHING, NY, 11354
WaterViolation Identified
QNCR 4
00Jun 2019View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)

DOT number
31079
Operation
A

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for THE NEW YORK TIMES. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2008-06-27Complaint22$3,750
1999-10-21Complaint1313$4,688

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

THE NEW YORK TIMES is one of 5 establishments rolled up under the parent organization The New York Times.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of The New York Times across all 5 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in newspaper publishers within NY, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by The New York Times, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on THE NEW YORK TIMES from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup The New York Times, which operates 5 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is THE NEW YORK TIMES's OSHA violation history?
THE NEW YORK TIMES has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 15 violations and $8,437.5 in total penalties.
How does THE NEW YORK TIMES's safety record compare to its industry?
THE NEW YORK TIMES operates in the newspaper publishers industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 0.8. THE NEW YORK TIMES's self-reported DART rate is 4.79 compared to an industry average of 0.6.