Skip to main content

Establishment profile

The New York Times

1111 Marcus Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY, 11042
Operated by The New York Times · 1 of 5 establishments
511110Newspaper Publishers

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
0
over 17 years
Violations
0
Penalties
$0
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Context
No OSHA inspections on record. This does not mean the employer is violation-free — OSHA inspects a small fraction of workplaces annually.

Summary

The New York Times has no OSHA inspection history on file. Federal records covering wage, environmental, labor relations, and other agencies are noted below where present.

The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 17 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

The New York Times appears in WHD wage enforcement and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in OSHA workplace safety, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for The New York Times. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
4.8
vs industry
+4.2
TRIR
7.2
vs industry
+6.4

Reported for 669 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
0.8
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.6
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
7.2
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for The New York Times. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
17 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 17+ years. Most recent activity: 17 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$850
Employees affected
1

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour breakdown by law

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 2 violations · $850 in backwages

StatutePeriodCasesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
FMLA (family & medical leave)Jan 2009121$850

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 2 violations · $850 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Dec 2008 – Jan 2009Newspaper PublishersFMLA21$850

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for The New York Times. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in NY — for The New York Times, not this location alone

Total cases
47
Unfair labor practice
44
Representation (union)
2

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other The New York Times locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 47 cases · 44 ULP · 2 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
02-CA-388333Unfair labor practiceMay 2026OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-387872Unfair labor practiceMay 2026OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-358026Unfair labor practiceJan 2025OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-RC-357904Representation electionJan 2025OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-UC-354185UCNov 2024OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-352678Unfair labor practiceOct 2024OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-352664Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-343109Unfair labor practiceMay 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-337184Unfair labor practiceFeb 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-324466Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Oct 2024ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-323953Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-323471Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-320152Unfair labor practiceJun 2023May 2024ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-315211Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-315209Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-310421Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-308808Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-308788Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-295918Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jan 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-295819Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-292360Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Jan 2025ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-290984Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-290964Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-290396Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-289497Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Mar 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-286106Unfair labor practiceNov 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-284871Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-281124Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Nov 2021ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-RC-280769Representation electionAug 2021Mar 2022ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-278244Unfair labor practiceJun 2021May 2023ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-273247Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-253569Unfair labor practiceDec 2019Feb 2020ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-236047Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-230979Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-230930Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-225668Unfair labor practiceAug 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-191717Unfair labor practiceJan 2017Apr 2017ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-144030Unfair labor practiceJan 2015May 2015ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-126809Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
29-CA-120788Unfair labor practiceJan 2014Apr 2014ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-119815Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Mar 2014ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
29-CA-109323Unfair labor practiceJul 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 29, Brooklyn, New York
02-CA-040222Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Jan 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-039968Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Nov 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-039967Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Nov 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-038222Unfair labor practiceApr 2007Jun 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-035440Unfair labor practiceApr 2003Aug 2003ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for The New York Times. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for The New York Times. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for The New York Times. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

In the news

Part of a larger organization

The New York Times is one of 5 establishments rolled up under the parent organization The New York Times.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of The New York Times across all 5 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in newspaper publishers within NY, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by The New York Times, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on The New York Times from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup The New York Times, which operates 5 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is The New York Times's OSHA violation history?
The New York Times has no OSHA inspections on record.
How does The New York Times's safety record compare to its industry?
The New York Times operates in the newspaper publishers industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 0.8. The New York Times's self-reported DART rate is 4.79 compared to an industry average of 0.6.
The New York Times — OSHA Violations & Safety Record | FastDOL