Skip to main content

Establishment profile

SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.

4249 BEERMAN AVENUE, DAYTON, OH, 45417
Operated by Sugar Creek Packing Company · 1 of 7 establishments
311612Meat Processed from Carcasses
EIN 311225301

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
7
over 14 years
Violations
8
$33,500 in penalties
Penalties
$33,500
$4,188 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 hospitalizations · 6 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. has accumulated 8 OSHA violations across 7 inspections over 14 years of recorded history, with $33,500 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 60th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 112 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 85th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 2 months ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
7
0.5 / yr · last 14 yrs
Violations
8
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$33,500
$4,188 avg / violation
25% serious75% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
3 of 7
Inspection trigger · referral
3 of 7

71% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 7 distinct standards shown · 8 citations in this view · $33,500 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0122$15,000Jul 2013Oct 2020
29 CFR 1910.0022 C11$13,000Aug 2020Aug 2020
29 CFR 1910.0146 G0111$3,000Sep 2013Sep 2013
29 CFR 1910.0252 B04 IV11$2,000Sep 2013Sep 2013
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 II B11$500Sep 2013Sep 2013
29 CFR 1910.0157 G0311Sep 2013Sep 2013
29 CFR 1910.0146 J0411Sep 2013Sep 2013

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

60th

Above average violations in NAICS 3116 within OH. Peer group: 112 employers. This establishment has 8 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
86th
peer median: $7,000
Inspection frequency
85th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
2.5
vs industry
−0.2
TRIR
3.3
vs industry
−0.4

Reported for 493 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.7
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.7
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
3.3
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Complaint
3
Referral
3

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Apr 2020 – Jun 2024 · 1 in last 5 years

Reports
3
Hospitalizations
2
Amputations
1
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Jun 1, 2024Other fall to lower level unspecifiedRib(s), oblique areaHospitalized
Jul 1, 2020Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaningFinger(s), fingernail(s), unspecifiedHospitalized
Apr 15, 2020Caught in running equipment or machinery, unspecifiedFingertip(s)Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Jul 1, 2020Caught In,Finger,Fracture,Jammed,Sealing Machine11
Apr 15, 2020Amputated,Amputation,Caught Between,Caught In,Conveyor,Crushed,Finger,Hand,Instantaneous amputation,Lack of Engineering Controls,Machine Guarding,Machine operator,Meat Processing,Misjudgment,Misjudgment of Hazardous Situation,Pinch Point,Pinched,Power Roller,Roller--Mach/Part,Rotating Parts,Thumb,Traumatic Amputation1

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
2 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 2 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in OH — for Sugar Creek Packing Company, not this location alone

Total cases
4
Unfair labor practice
3
Representation (union)
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Sugar Creek Packing Company locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 4 cases · 3 ULP · 1 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
09-CA-219705Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Jun 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-RC-219203Representation electionApr 2018Jun 2018ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-162785Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio
09-CA-162673Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 09, Cincinnati, Ohio

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2026-04-09Referral0$0
2020-07-10Referral1$10,000
2020-04-23Referral11$13,000
2013-07-03Complaint1$5,000
2013-06-10Complaint2$500
2013-06-10Complaint31$5,000
2011-08-18Planned0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. is one of 7 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Sugar Creek Packing Company.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Sugar Creek Packing Company across all 7 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in meat processed from carcasses within OH, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Sugar Creek Packing Company, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Sugar Creek Packing Company, which operates 7 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.'s OSHA violation history?
SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. has 7 OSHA inspections on record with 8 violations and $33,500 in total penalties.
How does SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.'s safety record compare to its industry?
SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. operates in the meat processed from carcasses industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.7. SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.'s self-reported DART rate is 2.48 compared to an industry average of 2.7.