Establishment profile
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
1926 SOUTH PIONEER RD., SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84111
Operated by M A Mortenson Company · 1 of 195 establishments
237310 — Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
EIN 410740923
Summary
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION has accumulated 21 OSHA violations across 13 inspections over 43 years of recorded history.
The establishment sits in the 99th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 127 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 months ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION appears in OSHA workplace safety and WHD wage enforcement records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
46% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 20 citations in this view.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCA 34A-6-201(1)(A) | 1 | 1 | — | Oct 2025 | Oct 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0028 B03 II | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 2021 | Jul 2021 |
| 29 CFR 1926.1101 K02 I | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 2011 | Jan 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 A02 | 1 | 1 | — | May 1998 | May 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 E05 I | 1 | 1 | — | May 1998 | May 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 C04 | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 G01 II | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B02 | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 G02 III | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0037 G03 | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0037 Q01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0038 A01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 C01 | 1 | 1 | — | Jan 1994 | Jan 1994 |
| GEN0212015 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 1982 | Aug 1982 |
| GEN0303072 00001 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 1982 | Aug 1982 |
| GEN0305022 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 1982 | Aug 1982 |
| GEN0305071 00003 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 1982 | Aug 1982 |
| GEN0305072 00003 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 1982 | Aug 1982 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 2373 within UT. Peer group: 127 employers. This establishment has 21 OSHA violations; peer median is 0.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 11 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 2 statutes · 2 violations · $34,667 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMLA (family & medical leave) | Jan 2024 | 1 | 1 | 1 | $34,667 | — |
| Service Contract Act (federal services) | Jun 2020 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 2 cases · 2 violations · $34,667 in backwages · 1 worker affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2022 – Jan 2024 | Local Police Protection | FMLA | 1 | 1 | $34,667 | — |
| Aug 2019 – Jun 2020 | Executive Offices | SCA | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION (LHR) GRANT PROGRAM IS TO MAXIMIZE THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF SIX PROTECTED FROM LEAD POISONING BY ASSISTING STATES, CITIES, COUNTIES/PARISHES, NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES OR OTHER UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN UNDERTAKING COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAMS TO IDENTIFY AND CONTROL LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS IN ELIGIBLE PRIVATELY-OWNED RENTAL OR OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING POPULATIONS. IN ADDITION, THERE IS HEALTHY HOMES SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE THAT IS INTENDED TO ENHANCE THE LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD CONTROL ACTIVITIES BY COMPREHENSIVELY IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING OTHER HOUSING HAZARDS THAT AFFECT OCCUPANT HEALTH. INFORMATION ABOUT WHERE THE SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING CAN BE USED CAN BE FOUND AT. HTTPS://WWW.HUD.GOV/PROGRAM_OFFICES/HEALTHY_HOMES/PROJECT_DESCRIPTIONS; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: PROGRAM FUNDS WILL BE AWARDED TO APPLICANTS TO ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVES: A. TARGETED UNITS: TARGET LEAD HAZARD CONTROL EFFORTS IN HOUSING UNITS WHERE CHILDREN LESS THAN 6 YEARS OF AGE ARE AT GREATEST RISK OF LEAD POISONING (PRE-1960, AND, ESPECIALLY, PRE-1940 CONSTRUCTION), WHICH HAS HISTORICALLY INCLUDED CHILDREN IN LOW-INCOME AND MINORITY NEIGHBORHOODS, TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF ELEVATED BLOOD LEAD LEVELS IN THESE CHILDREN. B. COST EFFECTIVENESS: UTILIZE COST-EFFECTIVE LEAD HAZARD CONTROL METHODS AND APPROACHES THAT ENSURE THE LONG-TERM SAFETY OF THE BUILDING OCCUPANTS. C. CAPACITY: BUILD LOCAL CAPACITY OF TRAINED AND CERTIFIED INDIVIDUALS AND FIRMS TO ADDRESS LEAD HAZARDS SAFELY AND EFFECTIVELY DURING LEAD HAZARD CONTROL, RENOVATION, REMODELING, AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES. ANOTHER CORE ELEMENT FOR CAPACITY INCLUDES THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE, COMMUNITY-BASED APPROACHES TO INTEGRATING THIS GRANT PROGRAM WITHIN OTHER LOCAL INITIATIVES THROUGH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS THAT ADDRESS HOUSING RELATED HEALTH AND SAFETY HAZARDS AND/OR SERVE LOW-INCOME FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF SIX (6). D. AFFIRMATIVE MARKETING: ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT A DETAILED PROCESS OF MONITORING AND ENSURING THAT UNITS MADE LEAD-SAFE ARE AFFIRMATIVELY MARKETED, AND PRIORITY GIVEN, TO FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN UNDER AGE 6 YEARS FOR NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS. E. DATA COLLECTION: GATHER PRE- AND POST-TREATMENT DATA THAT SUPPORTS AND VALIDATES LEAD HAZARD CONTROL INVESTMENTS. PROGRAM DATA COLLECTED SHOULD SUPPORT THE EVALUATION OF GRANT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND OUTCOMES. F. TARGETED OUTREACH AND EDUCATION: CONDUCTING TARGETED OUTREACH, AFFIRMATIVE MARKETING, EDUCATION OR OUTREACH PROGRAMS ON LEAD HAZARD CONTROL AND LEAD POISONING PREVENTION DESIGNED TO INCREASE THE ABILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO DELIVER THE SPECIFIED LEAD HAZARD CONTROL SERVICES THROUGH THIS PROGRAM; INCLUDING EDUCATING OWNERS OF ELIGIBLE RENTAL PROPERTIES, TENANTS, AND OTHERS ON THE BENEFITS AND EXPECTATIONS OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROGRAM PROVIDED BY "TITLE X" OF THE RESIDENTIAL LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION ACT OF 1992.; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: TO IDENTIFY AND CLEAN UP DANGEROUS LEAD IN LOW-INCOME FAMILIES’ HOMES WHERE LOW-INCOME FAMILIES WERE CHILDREN 6 AND UNDER RESIDE. THESE INVESTMENTS WILL PROTECT FAMILIES AND CHILDREN BY TARGETING SIGNIFICANT LEAD AND HEALTH HAZARDS IN OVER 3,700 LOW-INCOME HOMES FOR WHICH OTHER RESOURCES ARE NOT AVAILABLE.; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: TO ASSIST STATES, CITIES, COUNTIES/PARISHES, NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES OR OTHER UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN UNDERTAKING COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAMS TO IDENTIFY AND CONTROL LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS IN ELIGIBLE PRIVATELY-OWNED RENTAL OR OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING POPULATIONS WERE CHILDREN UNDER 6 RESIDE.; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2024-09-30$3,998,800
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2021-07-29$3,570,517
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2022-11-01$3,448,653
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM PROVIDES ANNUAL GRANTS ON A FORMULA BASIS TO STATES, CITIES, AND COUNTIES TO DEVELOP VIABLE URBAN COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING DECENT HOUSING AND A SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT, AND BY EXPANDING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES, PRINCIPALLY FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. THE PROGRAM IS AUTHORIZED UNDER TITLE 1 OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, PUBLIC LAW 93-383, AS AMENDED 42 U.S.C. 5301 ET SEQ. THE CDBG PROGRAM COVERS FOUR DISTINCT PROGRAMS, EACH WITH THEIR OWN SET OF GOVERNING REGULATIONS: CDBG ENTITLEMENT, CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII, CDBG INSULAR AREAS, AND STATE CDBG. IN THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM, HUD AWARDS GRANTS TO ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITY GRANTEES TO CARRY OUT A WIDE RANGE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITIES DEVELOP THEIR OWN PROGRAMS AND FUNDING PRIORITIES. IN THE CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII PROGRAM, THREE COUNTIES QUALIFY: HAWAII, KAUAI, AND MAUI. THE FY 2004 APPROPRIATIONS ACT REQUIRED THE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII TO DECIDE IF THE STATE WISHED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM BY JULY 31, 2004. THE STATE MADE THE DECISION NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. AS A RESULT OF THIS DECISION HUD'S HONOLULU FIELD OFFICE ADMINISTERS THE NON-ENTITLED GRANTS IN HAWAII. FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED USING A FORMULA BASED ON POPULATION, POVERTY, AND HOUSING OVERCROWDING, WITH THE POVERTY FACTOR CARRYING A DOUBLE WEIGHT. FOR THE CDBG INSULAR AREAS PROGRAM, HUD ANNUALLY ALLOCATES CDBG GRANTS TO FOUR DESIGNATED AREAS: AMERICAN SAMOA; GUAM; NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS; AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. THE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED IN PROPORTION TO THE POPULATIONS OF THE ELIGIBLE TERRITORIES. THE PROGRAM IS ADMINISTERED BY HUD'S FIELD OFFICES IN PUERTO RICO AND HAWAII. UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES PASS THROUGH CDBG GRANTS TO UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ANNUALLY, EACH STATE DEVELOPS FUNDING PRIORITIES AND CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROJECTS. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS. NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS INCLUDE THOSE UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHICH DO NOT RECEIVE CDBG FUNDS DIRECTLY FROM HUD. GENERALLY, NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS ARE CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 50,000 (EXCEPT CITIES THAT ARE DESIGNATED PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS), AND COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 200,000. CURRENT CDBG AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS LIST OF HUD COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD) AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/ALLOCATIONS-AWARDS/; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: CDBG FUNDS MAY BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY; RELOCATION AND DEMOLITION; REHABILITATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES; CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES, STREETS, NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS, AND THE CONVERSION OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS FOR ELIGIBLE PURPOSES; PUBLIC SERVICES, WITHIN CERTAIN LIMITS; ACTIVITIES RELATING TO ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE TO PROFIT-MOTIVATED BUSINESSES TO CARRY OUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOB CREATION/RETENTION ACTIVITIES. EACH ACTIVITY MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING NATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROGRAM: BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS, PREVENTION OR ELIMINATION OF SLUMS OR BLIGHT, OR ADDRESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY BECAUSE EXISTING CONDITIONS POSE A SERIOUS AND IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE HEALTH OR WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY FOR WHICH OTHER FUNDING IS NOT AVAILABLE. GENERALLY, THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ACTIVITIES ARE INELIGIBLE: ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, OR RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS FOR THE GENERAL CONDUCT OF GOVERNMENT; POLITICAL ACTIVITIES; CERTAIN INCOME PAYMENTS; CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING (WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS). UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES MAY USE $100,000 PLUS UP TO A MAXIMUM OF THREE PERCENT OF ITS CDBG ALLOCATION. AMOUNTS EXPENDED ON ADMINISTRATION IN EXCESS OF $100,000 MUST BE MATCHED. STATES MAY EXPEND UP TO THREE PERCENT OF THEIR CDBG ALLOCATION ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, THE TOTAL A STATE SPENDS ON BOTH ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EXPENSES MAY NOT EXCEED $100,000 PLUS THREE PERCENT OF THE STATE'S ALLOCATION. CPD HAS DEVELOPED PROFILES THAT DISPLAY GRANTEE-REPORTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR SELECTED HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, AND PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES. PROFILES FOR GRANTEES WILL VARY, AS GRANTEES HAVE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING THE HOUSING, ECONOMIC, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES THEY CARRY OUT WITH CDBG FUNDS. THE MOST RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS CAN BE VIEWED WITHIN THE NATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/PROGRAMS/CDBG/CDBG-ACCOMPLISHMENT-REPORTS/; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: THE CDBG PROGRAM REINFORCES SEVERAL IMPORTANT VALUES AND PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY TO EMPOWER PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT STRATEGIES TAILORED TO THEIR OWN NEEDS AND PRIORITIES; AN EMPHASIS ON CONSOLIDATED PLANNING THAT EXPANDS AND STRENGTHENS PARTNERSHIPS AMONG ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN ENHANCING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES AND SET-ASIDE FOR GRANTEES TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF THESE PARTNERS. EACH CDBG GRANTEE’S EXPECTED OUTCOMES ARE DESCRIBED AS GOALS IN THEIR CONSOLIDATED PLAN. THE MOST RECENT CONSOLIDATED PLANS CAN BE VIEWED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/REPORTS/#CONSOLIDATED-PLANS-ANNUAL-ACTION-PLANS-AND-CAPERS; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: OVER A 1, 2, OR 3-YEAR PERIOD, AS SELECTED BY THE GRANTEE, NOT LESS THAN 70 PERCENT OF CDBG FUNDS MUST BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES THAT BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. HUD DOES NOT PROVIDE CDBG ASSISTANCE DIRECTLY TO INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, NONPROFIT OR ORGANIZATIONS OR OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROGRAM, SHOULD CONTACT THEIR LOCAL MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY OFFICIALS TO FIND OUT HOW THE PROGRAM OPERATES IN THEIR COMMUNITY. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS MAY DIFFER FROM ONE GRANTEE TO ANOTHER. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANTEE ADMINISTERS THE CDBG PROGRAM AND DETERMINES WHICH LOCAL PROJECTS RECEIVE FUNDING. ELIGIBLE GRANTEES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAS); OTHER METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 50,000; QUALIFIED URBAN COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 200,000 (EXCLUDING THE POPULATION OF ENTITLED CITIES); STATES AND INSULAR AREAS. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS FUNDED UNDER THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM. THE STATE OF HAWAII DOES NOT PARTICIPATE, AND HUD ALLOCATES THE STATE'S SHARE OF FUNDS TO THE THREE HAWAII NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES. THE STATES ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS.; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2023-08-08$3,397,763
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM PROVIDES ANNUAL GRANTS ON A FORMULA BASIS TO STATES, CITIES, AND COUNTIES TO DEVELOP VIABLE URBAN COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING DECENT HOUSING AND A SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT, AND BY EXPANDING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES, PRINCIPALLY FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. THE PROGRAM IS AUTHORIZED UNDER TITLE 1 OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, PUBLIC LAW 93-383, AS AMENDED 42 U.S.C. 5301 ET SEQ. THE CDBG PROGRAM COVERS FOUR DISTINCT PROGRAMS, EACH WITH THEIR OWN SET OF GOVERNING REGULATIONS: CDBG ENTITLEMENT, CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII, CDBG INSULAR AREAS, AND STATE CDBG. IN THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM, HUD AWARDS GRANTS TO ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITY GRANTEES TO CARRY OUT A WIDE RANGE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITIES DEVELOP THEIR OWN PROGRAMS AND FUNDING PRIORITIES. IN THE CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII PROGRAM, THREE COUNTIES QUALIFY: HAWAII, KAUAI, AND MAUI. THE FY 2004 APPROPRIATIONS ACT REQUIRED THE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII TO DECIDE IF THE STATE WISHED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM BY JULY 31, 2004. THE STATE MADE THE DECISION NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. AS A RESULT OF THIS DECISION HUD'S HONOLULU FIELD OFFICE ADMINISTERS THE NON-ENTITLED GRANTS IN HAWAII. FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED USING A FORMULA BASED ON POPULATION, POVERTY, AND HOUSING OVERCROWDING, WITH THE POVERTY FACTOR CARRYING A DOUBLE WEIGHT. FOR THE CDBG INSULAR AREAS PROGRAM, HUD ANNUALLY ALLOCATES CDBG GRANTS TO FOUR DESIGNATED AREAS: AMERICAN SAMOA; GUAM; NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS; AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. THE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED IN PROPORTION TO THE POPULATIONS OF THE ELIGIBLE TERRITORIES. THE PROGRAM IS ADMINISTERED BY HUD'S FIELD OFFICES IN PUERTO RICO AND HAWAII. UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES PASS THROUGH CDBG GRANTS TO UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ANNUALLY, EACH STATE DEVELOPS FUNDING PRIORITIES AND CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROJECTS. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS. NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS INCLUDE THOSE UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHICH DO NOT RECEIVE CDBG FUNDS DIRECTLY FROM HUD. GENERALLY, NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS ARE CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 50,000 (EXCEPT CITIES THAT ARE DESIGNATED PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS), AND COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 200,000. CURRENT CDBG AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS LIST OF HUD COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD) AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/ALLOCATIONS-AWARDS/; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: CDBG FUNDS MAY BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY; RELOCATION AND DEMOLITION; REHABILITATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES; CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES, STREETS, NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS, AND THE CONVERSION OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS FOR ELIGIBLE PURPOSES; PUBLIC SERVICES, WITHIN CERTAIN LIMITS; ACTIVITIES RELATING TO ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE TO PROFIT-MOTIVATED BUSINESSES TO CARRY OUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOB CREATION/RETENTION ACTIVITIES. EACH ACTIVITY MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING NATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROGRAM: BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS, PREVENTION OR ELIMINATION OF SLUMS OR BLIGHT, OR ADDRESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY BECAUSE EXISTING CONDITIONS POSE A SERIOUS AND IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE HEALTH OR WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY FOR WHICH OTHER FUNDING IS NOT AVAILABLE. GENERALLY, THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ACTIVITIES ARE INELIGIBLE: ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, OR RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS FOR THE GENERAL CONDUCT OF GOVERNMENT; POLITICAL ACTIVITIES; CERTAIN INCOME PAYMENTS; CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING (WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS). UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES MAY USE $100,000 PLUS UP TO A MAXIMUM OF THREE PERCENT OF ITS CDBG ALLOCATION. AMOUNTS EXPENDED ON ADMINISTRATION IN EXCESS OF $100,000 MUST BE MATCHED. STATES MAY EXPEND UP TO THREE PERCENT OF THEIR CDBG ALLOCATION ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, THE TOTAL A STATE SPENDS ON BOTH ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EXPENSES MAY NOT EXCEED $100,000 PLUS THREE PERCENT OF THE STATE'S ALLOCATION. CPD HAS DEVELOPED PROFILES THAT DISPLAY GRANTEE-REPORTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR SELECTED HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, AND PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES. PROFILES FOR GRANTEES WILL VARY, AS GRANTEES HAVE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING THE HOUSING, ECONOMIC, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES THEY CARRY OUT WITH CDBG FUNDS. THE MOST RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS CAN BE VIEWED WITHIN THE NATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/PROGRAMS/CDBG/CDBG-ACCOMPLISHMENT-REPORTS/; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: THE CDBG PROGRAM REINFORCES SEVERAL IMPORTANT VALUES AND PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY TO EMPOWER PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT STRATEGIES TAILORED TO THEIR OWN NEEDS AND PRIORITIES; AN EMPHASIS ON CONSOLIDATED PLANNING THAT EXPANDS AND STRENGTHENS PARTNERSHIPS AMONG ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN ENHANCING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES AND SET-ASIDE FOR GRANTEES TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF THESE PARTNERS. EACH CDBG GRANTEE’S EXPECTED OUTCOMES ARE DESCRIBED AS GOALS IN THEIR CONSOLIDATED PLAN. THE MOST RECENT CONSOLIDATED PLANS CAN BE VIEWED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/REPORTS/#CONSOLIDATED-PLANS-ANNUAL-ACTION-PLANS-AND-CAPERS; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: OVER A 1, 2, OR 3-YEAR PERIOD, AS SELECTED BY THE GRANTEE, NOT LESS THAN 70 PERCENT OF CDBG FUNDS MUST BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES THAT BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. HUD DOES NOT PROVIDE CDBG ASSISTANCE DIRECTLY TO INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, NONPROFIT OR ORGANIZATIONS OR OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROGRAM, SHOULD CONTACT THEIR LOCAL MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY OFFICIALS TO FIND OUT HOW THE PROGRAM OPERATES IN THEIR COMMUNITY. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS MAY DIFFER FROM ONE GRANTEE TO ANOTHER. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANTEE ADMINISTERS THE CDBG PROGRAM AND DETERMINES WHICH LOCAL PROJECTS RECEIVE FUNDING. ELIGIBLE GRANTEES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAS); OTHER METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 50,000; QUALIFIED URBAN COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 200,000 (EXCLUDING THE POPULATION OF ENTITLED CITIES); STATES AND INSULAR AREAS. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS FUNDED UNDER THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM. THE STATE OF HAWAII DOES NOT PARTICIPATE, AND HUD ALLOCATES THE STATE'S SHARE OF FUNDS TO THE THREE HAWAII NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES. THE STATES ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS.; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2024-09-23$3,335,779
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2020-12-04$3,063,849
- Department of JusticeTHE COPS HIRING PROGRAM (CHP) PROVIDES FUNDING TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO HIRE AND/OR REHIRE ADDITIONAL CAREER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN AN EFFORT TO INCREASE THEIR COMMUNITY POLICING CAPACITY AND CRIME PREVENTION EFFORTS. ANTICIPATED OUTCOMES OF CHP AWARDS INCLUDE ENGAGEMENT IN PLANNED COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS, IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECTS TO ANALYZE AND ASSESS PROBLEMS, IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES TO PERSONNEL AND AGENCY MANAGEMENT IN SUPPORT OF COMMUNITY POLICING, AND INCREASED CAPACITY OF AGENCY TO ENGAGE IN COMMUNITY POLICING ACTIVITIES.assistance · Last action 2024-09-30$1,500,000
- Department of JusticeTHE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANTS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CYBERCRIMES PROGRAM (CYBERCRIMES ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM) SUPPORTS EFFORTS BY STATES, INDIAN TRIBES, AND UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO PREVENT, INVESTIGATE, AND PROSECUTE CYBERCRIMES AGAINST INDIVIDUALS. CYBERCRIMES AGAINST INDIVIDUALS ARE DEFINED AS CRIMINAL OFFENSES THAT INVOLVE THE USE OF A COMPUTER TO HARASS, THREATEN, STALK, EXTORT, COERCE, CAUSE FEAR TO, OR INTIMIDATE AN INDIVIDUAL, OR WITHOUT CONSENT DISTRIBUTE INTIMATE IMAGES OF AN ADULT, EXCEPT THAT USE OF A COMPUTER NEED NOT BE AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE. (SEE 34 U.S.C. 30107(A)(2)). THE TERM COMPUTER INCLUDES A COMPUTER NETWORK AND AN INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC DEVICE. CYBERCRIMES AGAINST INDIVIDUALS DO NOT INCLUDE THE USE OF A COMPUTER TO CAUSE HARM TO A COMMERCIAL ENTITY, GOVERNMENT AGENCY OR NONNATURAL PERSON. THE PROJECT WILL SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES:1) TRAINING SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENTEMPLOYEES AND DISPATCHERS; 2) ENHANCING VICTIM AND COMMUNITY AWARENESS; 3) IMPROVING INVESTIGATIONS WITH TECHNOLOGY; 4) PROVIDING OVERTIME FOR INVESTIGATORS; 5) CONTINUING COORDINATED COMMUNITY RESPONSE WORK TO ASSESS AND IMPROVE RESPONSES TO CYBERCRIMES AGAINST INDIVIDUALS WITHIN THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF THE AWARD; AND 6) PROVIDING FUNDS TO YWCA UTAH TO PROVIDE VICTIM SERVICES.assistance · Last action 2026-04-15$700,000
- Executive Office of the PresidentHIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREAS HIDTA PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR FY 2025 GRANT AWARDassistance · Last action 2025-05-23$579,834
- Department of JusticeTHE DISPARATE JURISDICTIONS OF SALT LAKE COUNTY AND SALT LAKE CITY WILL USE JAG FUNDS FOR TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS, EQUIPMENT, OVERTIME, AND TRAINING. SPECIFICALLY, THE COUNTY OF SALT LAKE WILL USE JAG FUNDS TO PURCHASE NARCOTICS ANALYSIS EQUIPMENT, AND NECESSARY FORENSICS AND SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS EQUIPMENT TO HELP OFFICERS AND FORENSICS TECHNICIANS INCREASE EFFICIENCY AND IMPROVE SAFETY. THE CITY OF SALT LAKE CITY WILL USE JAG FUNDS TO PROVIDE OVERTIME TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY RESPONSE, EQUIPMENT TO IMPROVE ITS CAMERA PROGRAMS AND SPECIAL OPERATIONS UNITS, AND TRAVEL TRAINING FOR ITS SWORN AND CIVILIAN STAFF TO PROVIDE PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE.assistance · Last action 2023-09-25$386,620
- Department of JusticeTHE DISPARATE JURISDICTIONS OF SALT LAKE COUNTY AND SALT LAKE CITY PROPOSE TO USE JAG FUNDS FOR TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS, EQUIPMENT, OVERTIME, AND TRAINING. SPECIFICALLY, THE COUNTY OF SALT LAKE WILL USE JAG FUNDS TO PURCHASE K9 POLICE DOGS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT TO HELP OFFICERS AND FORENSIC INVESTIGATORS INCREASE EFFICIENCY AND IMPROVE SAFETY. THE CITY OF SALT LAKE CITY WILL USE JAG FUNDS TO PROVIDE OVERTIME TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY RESPONSE, EQUIPMENT TO IMPROVE ITS CAMERA PROGRAMS, AND TRAVEL TRAINING FOR ITS SWORN AND CIVILIAN STAFF TO IMPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICE.assistance · Last action 2024-12-05$339,322
- Department of Veterans AffairsUTLcontract · Last action 2020-08-04$330,930
- Department of Veterans AffairsWATER AND SEWER SERVICEcontract · Last action 2007-10-01$315,373
- General Services AdministrationTHIS FORM 300 PURCHASE ORDER GS-08P-14-JE-C-0020 IS BEING PROCESSED FOR PAYMENT AND OBLIGATION PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS TO PROVIDE FY 2014 FUNDING FOR WATER, TRASH, SEWER, AND FIRE PROTECTION UTILITY METERING SERVICE FOR THE FEDERAL BUILDING AND COURTHOUSE, 351 (SOUTH) WEST TEMPLE, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101. THIS ORDER REPRESENTS A 10 YEAR ACTION FROM MARCH 20, 2014 THROUGH MARCH 19, 2024. THE CURRENT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OBLIGATION IS FROM MARCH 20, 2014 THROUGH MARCH 19, 2015 AND IS FOR PAYMENT AND OBLIGATION PURPOSES ONLY. AS THE CONTRACTOR IS A REGULATED UTILITY AND THE ONLY SOURCE FOR UTILITY SERVICE AVAILABLE, THE RATE IS CONSIDERED TO BE FAIR AND REASONABLE IGF::OT::IGFcontract · Last action 2020-03-31$307,789
- Department of the InteriorARMED POLICE OFFICER FOR BLM UTAH STATE OFFICE SECURITYcontract · Last action 2021-04-14$127,867
- General Services AdministrationUTILITY SERVICES WATER AND SEWER SERVICES CONTRACT PERIOD FROM 10/01/2007 TO 09/30/2017contract · Last action 2017-07-18$120,936
- Department of the InteriorARMED POLICE OFFICER FOR BLM UTAH STATE OFFICE SECURITYcontract · Last action 2020-02-13$118,960
- Department of the InteriorIGF::OT::IGF UTSO ARMED POLICE OFFICERcontract · Last action 2018-11-29$115,981
- Department of JusticeSALT LAKE CITY WILL USE FY24 LEMHWA FUNDING TO SUPPORT TRAINING FOR WELLNESS TEAM, PEER MENTORING TRAINING FOR PEER SUPPORT TEAM, WELLNESS WORKSHOP FOR DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES, AND NATIONAL CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE; SUPPLIES INCLUDING BOOKS FOR A LENDING LIBRARY, PRINTING OF MANUALS, PRINTING OF WELLNESS FLYERS, AND WELLNESS BAGS; CONTRACTS TO INCLUDE A MOBILE WELLNESS APP FOR EMPLOYEES AND THEIR FAMILIES AND ACCOMPANYING TRAINING; AND OVERTIME FOR PEER SUPPORT TEAM TO EXPAND SERVICES IN THE DEPARTMENT.assistance · Last action 2024-09-30$98,786
- General Services AdministrationUTILITY SERVICES, WATER AND SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT PERIOD FROM 10/01/2007 TO 09/30/2017.contract · Last action 2017-11-20$66,802
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-07-01$42,749
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-07-01$42,749
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-07-01$42,749
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-04-01$42,749
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-04-01$42,749
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-04-01$42,749
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2007-10-01$42,749
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2007-10-01$42,749
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-01-01$34,791
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-01-01$34,791
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2008-01-01$34,791
- General Services AdministrationLEASEcontract · Last action 2007-10-01$34,791
- General Services AdministrationTHIS ORDER REPRESENTS A 10 YEAR ACTION FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2027. THE CURRENT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OBLIGATION IS FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND IS FOR PAYMENT AND OBLIGATION PURPOSES ONLY.contract · Last action 2020-03-30$28,124
- Department of JusticeTHE SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL DEVELOP AN EVALUATION OF THE PROMISING YOUTH PROJECT. THIS EVALUATION WILL PROVIDE FOUR MAJOR SERVICES: EVALUATION OF PROGRAM FIDELITY, EVALUATION OF PROGRAM OUTCOMES, TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF A FINAL REPORT.assistance · Last action 2026-03-10$24,170
- General Services AdministrationUTILITIES SERVICES. WATER AND SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT PERIOD FROM 10/01/2007 TO 09/30/2017.contract · Last action 2018-08-15$20,436
- General Services AdministrationTHIS ORDER REPRESENTS A 10 YEAR ACTION FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2027. THE CURRENT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OBLIGATION IS FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND IS FOR PAYMENT AND OBLIGATION PURPOSES ONLY IGF::OT::IGFcontract · Last action 2020-03-30$8,800
- Department of the InteriorCEMETERY PLOTScontract · Last action 2008-09-26$7,000
- General Services AdministrationSUPPORT FOR WATER FOR VISITOR PARKING LOT ADJACENT TO UT0032ZZcontract · Last action 2020-03-30$6,500
- General Services AdministrationUTILITY SERVICES. WATER AND SEWER SERVICES CONTRACT PERIOD FROM 10/01/2007 TO 9/30/2017.contract · Last action 2018-01-23$5,632
- General Services AdministrationFY 2012 FUNDING FOR UTILITY SUPPORT AT UT0017ZZcontract · Last action 2020-03-30$847
- General Services AdministrationUTILITY SERVICES WATER AND SEWER SERVICES FOR CONTRACT PERIOD FROM 10/01/2007 TO 09/30/2017contract · Last action 2018-01-22$782
- General Services AdministrationUTILITIY SERVICES. WATER AND SEWER SERVICES CONTRACT PERIOD FROM 10/01/2007 TO 09/30/2017.contract · Last action 2016-10-19$668
- General Services AdministrationUTILITY SERVICES. WATER AND SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT PERIOD FROM 10/01/2007 TO 09/30/2017.contract · Last action 2016-10-19$620
- General Services AdministrationTHIS ORDER REPRESENTS A 10 YEAR ACTION FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2027. THE CURRENT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OBLIGATION IS FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND IS FOR PAYMENT AND OBLIGATION PURPOSES ONLY.contract · Last action 2020-03-30$404
- General Services AdministrationTHIS ORDER REPRESENTS A 10 YEAR ACTION FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2027. THE CURRENT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OBLIGATION IS FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND IS FOR PAYMENT AND OBLIGATION PURPOSES ONLY.contract · Last action 2020-03-30$240
- General Services AdministrationTHIS ORDER REPRESENTS A 10 YEAR ACTION FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2027. THE CURRENT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OBLIGATION IS FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND IS FOR PAYMENT AND OBLIGATION PURPOSES ONLY.contract · Last action 2020-03-30$240
- General Services AdministrationTHIS ORDER REPRESENTS A 10 YEAR ACTION FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2027. THE CURRENT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND FUNDING OBLIGATION IS FROM OCTOBER 01, 2017 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AND IS FOR PAYMENT AND OBLIGATION PURPOSES ONLY.contract · Last action 2018-11-27$51
- General Services AdministrationWATER SERVICE FOR FIRE LINE FEM COURTHOUSE, 352 S MAIN STREET, SLC UTAH PERIOD OF SERVICE 7/1/10-9/30/2010contract · Last action 2010-06-01$27
- General Services AdministrationWATER/SEWER SERVICE FOR SLC MOTOR POOLcontract · Last action 2010-03-29$-12,523
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 221310 - WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. Last action: 2021-04-14. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-07 | Accident | 1 | 1 | $0 | |
| 2024-08-22 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2021-07-07 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2013-01-24 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2012-11-08 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2010-10-19 | Unprogrammed Related | 1 | 1 | $0 | |
| 2006-10-31 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1998-09-01 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1998-04-22 | Planned | 2 | 2 | $0 | |
| 1994-03-31 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1993-12-29 | Complaint | 10 | 1 | $0 | |
| 1982-10-06 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1982-08-12 | Planned | 6 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION is one of 195 establishments rolled up under the parent organization M A Mortenson Company.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of M A Mortenson Company across all 195 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in highway, street, and bridge construction within UT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- NIELSON CONSTRUCTION COHuntington — 4 federal enforcement records
- GENEVA ROCK PRODUCTS, INCWANSHIP — 3 federal enforcement records
- LEGRAND JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO.NIBLEY — 3 federal enforcement records
- GENEVA ROCK PRODUCTS INC.BRIGHAM CITY — 3 federal enforcement records
- WW CLYDE & COWASHINGTON — 3 federal enforcement records
- W W CLYDE & COCEDAR CITY — 3 federal enforcement records
- GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSALT LAKE CITY — 2 federal enforcement records
- Mel Clark Inc.Cedar City — 2 federal enforcement records
- MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS INCMURRAY — 2 federal enforcement records
- SUNROC CORPCEDAR CITY — 2 federal enforcement records
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by M A Mortenson Company, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- ROCKFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITALRockford, IL — 2 federal enforcement records
- M A MORTENSON COEau Claire, WI — 2 federal enforcement records
- M A MORTENSON COMPLS, MN — 1 federal enforcement record
- M A MORTENSON COSioux Falls, SD — 1 federal enforcement record
- M A MORTENSON COMissoula, MT — 1 federal enforcement record
- M A MORTENSON COMPANYMINNEAPOLIS, MN — 1 federal enforcement record
- M. A. MORTENSON COMPANYMILWAUKEE, WI — 1 federal enforcement record
- M. A. MORTENSON COMPANYBEAVER DAM, WI — 1 federal enforcement record
- M. A. MORTENSON COMPANYDES MOINES, IA — 1 federal enforcement record
- M. A. MORTENSON COMPANYOAK CREEK, WI — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All M A Mortenson Company locationsParent rollup
- Highway, Street, and Bridge ConstructionAll employers in this industry
- Employers in UTState-wide enforcement data
- Highway, Street, and in UTIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup M A Mortenson Company, which operates 195 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION's OSHA violation history?
- SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION has 13 OSHA inspections on record with 21 violations and $0 in total penalties.
- How does SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION's safety record compare to its industry?
- SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION operates in the highway, street, and bridge construction industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.5.