Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

Paragon Systems

The McMillan Aquaducts, WASHINGTON, DC, 20310
561612 — Security Guards and Patrol Services

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
0
Violations
0
Penalties
$0
Context
No OSHA inspections on record. This does not mean the employer is violation-free — OSHA inspects a small fraction of workplaces annually.

Summary

Paragon Systems has no OSHA inspection history on file. Federal records covering wage, environmental, labor relations, and other agencies are noted below where present.

The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 0 days ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

Paragon Systems appears in NLRB labor relations record only. No matching records were found in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.

OSHA workplace safety

No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for Paragon Systems. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for Paragon Systems. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.9
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
—
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Nov 2021

Reports
1
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Other fall to lower level, unspecified

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Nov 15, 2021Other fall to lower level, unspecifiedHead, neck, and trunkHospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
0 days ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 0 days ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for Paragon Systems. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for Paragon Systems. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in DC — for Paragon Systems, not this location alone

Total cases
157
Unfair labor practice
80
Representation (union)
77

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Paragon Systems locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 50 ULP · 48 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
05-CA-374087Unfair labor practiceSep 2025Jun 2026ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-371965Representation electionAug 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-371828Unfair labor practiceAug 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-370702Representation electionAug 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-370400Representation electionJul 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-363404Representation electionApr 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-362731Representation electionMar 2025Apr 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-359813Representation electionFeb 2025Apr 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-354572Unfair labor practiceNov 2024Jan 2026ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-348820Unfair labor practiceAug 2024Jan 2026ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-346221Representation electionJul 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-344455Representation electionJun 2024Jun 2024ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-341219Representation electionApr 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-340098Unfair labor practiceApr 2024May 2024ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-340087Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Oct 2024ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-326340Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Dec 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-320890Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-308336Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jul 2025ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-303127Representation electionSep 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-300979Representation electionAug 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-299588Representation electionJul 2022Apr 2023ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-299357Representation electionJul 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-294301Representation electionApr 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-294142Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-293536Representation electionApr 2022Apr 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-291959Representation electionMar 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-UD-290869UDFeb 2022Apr 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-288936Unfair labor practiceJan 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-UD-287877UDDec 2021Apr 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-287052Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Jun 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-285988Representation electionNov 2021Jan 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-285551Representation electionNov 2021Nov 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-285510Representation electionNov 2021Nov 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-285004Representation electionOct 2021Oct 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-282807Representation electionSep 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-282416Representation electionSep 2021Dec 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-282198Representation electionAug 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-280826Representation electionAug 2021Nov 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-280637Representation electionJul 2021Jan 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-279540Representation electionJul 2021Jul 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-277919Representation electionJun 2021Jun 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-276536Unfair labor practiceMay 2021May 2023ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-276600Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Jun 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-274523Representation electionMar 2021May 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-273746Unfair labor practiceMar 2021May 2023ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-273706Unfair labor practiceMar 2021Jul 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-273006Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-272238Representation electionFeb 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-271959Unfair labor practiceJan 2021Feb 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-271866Representation electionJan 2021Feb 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-267877Unfair labor practiceOct 2020Nov 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-267839Unfair labor practiceOct 2020Nov 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-265200Representation electionAug 2020Sep 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-264923Unfair labor practiceAug 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-264956Unfair labor practiceAug 2020Sep 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-261105Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Oct 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-258729Unfair labor practiceApr 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-257695Unfair labor practiceMar 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-255844Unfair labor practiceFeb 2020Feb 2022ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-254903Unfair labor practiceJan 2020Mar 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-254613Unfair labor practiceJan 2020Sep 2021ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-254605Unfair labor practiceJan 2020—OpenRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-252765Representation electionDec 2019Jan 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-252314Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Apr 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-251525Unfair labor practiceNov 2019May 2020ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-251335Unfair labor practiceNov 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-250930Representation electionOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-248473Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-248471Unfair labor practiceSep 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-248411Representation electionSep 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-247418Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-247402Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-247394Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-246994Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-246993Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-246232Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-245812Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Aug 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-241434Representation electionMay 2019Jul 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-241446Unfair labor practiceMay 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-238773Unfair labor practiceApr 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-237939Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-235322Representation electionFeb 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-234968Representation electionJan 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-232996Unfair labor practiceDec 2018Aug 2019ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-227709Unfair labor practiceSep 2018Sep 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-225737Representation electionAug 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-222767Representation electionJun 2018Sep 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-220574Representation electionMay 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-219617Representation electionMay 2018Sep 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-216150Representation electionMar 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-208799Representation electionOct 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-206815Representation electionSep 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-206059Unfair labor practiceSep 2017Jan 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-205598Representation electionSep 2017May 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-204956Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-203956Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Jan 2018ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-203253Representation electionJul 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-CA-194330Unfair labor practiceMar 2017Apr 2017ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-180833Representation electionJul 2016Sep 2016ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland
05-RC-180606Representation electionJul 2016Oct 2016ClosedRegion 05, Baltimore, Maryland

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for Paragon Systems. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for Paragon Systems. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in security guards and patrol services within DC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on Paragon Systems from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is Paragon Systems's OSHA violation history?
Paragon Systems has no OSHA inspections on record.
How does Paragon Systems's safety record compare to its industry?
Paragon Systems operates in the security guards and patrol services industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.4.