Skip to main content

Establishment profile

NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS

25900 FARGO AVENUE, BEDFORD HEIGHTS, OH, 44146
311813Frozen Cakes, Pies, and Other Pastries Manufacturing
EIN 310935623

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
3
over 45 years
Violations
22
$21,420 in penalties
Penalties
$21,420
$974 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS has accumulated 22 OSHA violations across 3 inspections over 45 years of recorded history, with $21,420 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 90th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 94 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 68th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 22 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
3
0.1 / yr · last 45 yrs
Violations
22
0.5 / yr
Penalties
$21,420
$974 avg / violation
73% serious27% other
Inspection trigger · planned
2 of 3
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 3

67% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 20 citations in this view · $21,420 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0146 C0411$7,000Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 G0111$5,000Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0132 A11$2,500Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0303 G02 I11$2,000Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0111$1,500Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I11$1,500Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 L0111$1,500Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0022 A0211$160Nov 1980Nov 1980
29 CFR 1910.0309 A 02505011$160Nov 1980Nov 1980
29 CFR 1910.0219 D0111$50Nov 1980Nov 1980
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0111$50Nov 1980Nov 1980
29 CFR 1910.0146 E0111Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 D03 I11Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 D0111Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 C07 I11Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0138 A11Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 D03 III11Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 D0411Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0146 D03 IV11Dec 2003Dec 2003
29 CFR 1910.0309 A 01101611Nov 1980Nov 1980

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

90th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3118 within OH. Peer group: 94 employers. This establishment has 22 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
76th
peer median: $8,556
Inspection frequency
68th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.4
vs industry
−1.7
TRIR
0.4
vs industry
−2.8

Reported for 215 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.2
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.1
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
2
Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
22 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 22+ years. Most recent activity: 22 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in OH — for NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS, not this location alone

Total cases
1
Unfair labor practice
1

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
08-CA-144002Unfair labor practiceJan 2015Feb 2015ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
1
Quarters non-compliant
0

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS (1318047969)
25900 FARGO AVE. · BEDFORD HEIGHTS, OH, 44146
AirNo Violation Identified10Jan 2024View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2003-07-11Complaint1515$21,000
1983-05-24Planned0$0
1980-10-22Planned71$420

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in frozen cakes, pies, and other pastries manufacturing within OH, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS's OSHA violation history?
NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS has 3 OSHA inspections on record with 22 violations and $21,420 in total penalties.
How does NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS's safety record compare to its industry?
NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS operates in the frozen cakes, pies, and other pastries manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.2. NEW YORK FROZEN FOODS's self-reported DART rate is 0.39 compared to an industry average of 2.1.