Establishment profile
NEO CORPORATION
289 SILKWOOD DRIVE, CANTON, NC, 28716
562910 — Remediation Services
Summary
NEO CORPORATION has accumulated 7 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 24 years of recorded history.
The establishment sits in the 89th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 344 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 81st percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 9 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
NEO CORPORATION appears in OSHA workplace safety, MSHA mine safety, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 7 distinct standards shown · 7 citations in this view.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 H01 I | 1 | 1 | — | May 2002 | May 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 H02 I | 1 | 1 | — | May 2002 | May 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 K01 I | 1 | 1 | — | May 2002 | May 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 K01 V | 1 | 1 | — | May 2002 | May 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1926.0062 E02 IIA | 1 | 1 | — | May 2002 | May 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1926.0062 E02 IIF | 1 | 1 | — | May 2002 | May 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1926.0062 E02 IIH | 1 | 1 | — | May 2002 | May 2002 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 5629 within NC. Peer group: 344 employers. This establishment has 7 OSHA violations; peer median is 0.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 50 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for NEO CORPORATION. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 9+ years. Most recent activity: 9 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for NEO CORPORATION. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
Company-level in NC — for NEO CORPORATION, not this location alone
Mine Safety & Health Administration — citations issued at mining operations. MSHA records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other NEO CORPORATION operations in the same state.
MSHA citations
Mine Safety and Health Administration citations. S&S (significant and substantial) marks violations that could reasonably contribute to a serious injury. Negligence rating is MSHA’s operator-culpability assessment (none, low, moderate, high, or reckless disregard). Proposed = assessed at issuance; Paid = post-settlement / appeal. 4 citations · 2S&S · 4 contractor · $551 proposed / $551 paid.
| Citation | Mine | Date | Section | S&S | Negligence | Proposed | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8899657 | Lee Creek Mine Beaufort, NC contractor: Neo Corp | Feb 2016 | — | Yes | ModNegligence | $243 | $243 |
| 8899660 | Lee Creek Mine Beaufort, NC contractor: Neo Corp | Feb 2016 | — | Yes | ModNegligence | $108 | $108 |
| 8899656 | Lee Creek Mine Beaufort, NC contractor: Neo Corp | Feb 2016 | — | No | ModNegligence | $100 | $100 |
| 8899655 | Lee Creek Mine Beaufort, NC contractor: Neo Corp | Feb 2016 | — | No | ModNegligence | $100 | $100 |
Source: MSHA citation database. “Contractor” annotations indicate the cited party was on-site at the mine but not the mine’s operator -- responsibility attaches to the contractor LLC, not the mine’s owner. Section codes reference 30 CFR (the Mine Safety and Health regulations).
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for NEO CORPORATION. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for NEO CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for NEO CORPORATION. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEO CORP 289 SILKWOOD DR · CANTON, NC, 28716 | RCRA | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | Jan 2005 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal contracts
This location
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 562910 - REMEDIATION SERVICES. Last action: 2026-02-06. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-28 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-04-15 | Programmed Related | 7 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in remediation services within NC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- HEPACO, INC.CHARLOTTE — 2 federal enforcement records
- SHAMROCK ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATIONHENDERSON — 2 federal enforcement records
- NEO CORPORATIONJACKSON SPRINGS — 2 federal enforcement records
- A & D ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.ARCHDALE — 2 federal enforcement records
- SAFECO ENVIRONMENTAL INCSHELBY — 1 federal enforcement record
- EME INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLCRALEIGH — 1 federal enforcement record
- ATC TOWER SERVICES, INC. DBA ATC CONSTRUCTIONRALEIGH — 1 federal enforcement record
- TRIANGLE RESTORATION AND PAINT LEGAL CO.RALEIGH — 1 federal enforcement record
- SOUTHEAST POLYMER INSTALLATIONS, INCORPORATEDSANFORD — 1 federal enforcement record
- SOUTHEASTERN MACHINE & WELDING COMPANY, INC.WILMINGTON — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Remediation ServicesAll employers in this industry
- Employers in NCState-wide enforcement data
- Remediation Services in NCIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on NEO CORPORATION from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is NEO CORPORATION's OSHA violation history?
- NEO CORPORATION has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 7 violations and $0 in total penalties.
- How does NEO CORPORATION's safety record compare to its industry?
- NEO CORPORATION operates in the remediation services industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.4. NEO CORPORATION's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.6.