Establishment profile
MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES
1301 JAMES STREET, HATTIESBURG, MS, 39401
311615 — Poultry Processing
Summary
MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES has accumulated 83 OSHA violations across 22 inspections over 49 years of recorded history, with $129,513 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 49 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 98th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 15 years ago.
Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 8 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 32 citations in this view · $103,638 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 3 | 3 | $2,288 | Apr 1994 | Apr 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C04 I | 2 | 2 | $14,900 | Apr 2010 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 E01 | 2 | 2 | $12,650 | Apr 2010 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 2 | 2 | $10,150 | Apr 2010 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 F03 | 2 | 2 | $5,900 | Apr 1994 | Apr 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C04 II | 2 | 2 | $5,750 | Apr 1994 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E03 I | 2 | 2 | $5,000 | Apr 1994 | Apr 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 G02 I | 2 | 2 | $3,000 | Apr 1994 | Apr 2010 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I | 2 | 2 | $1,500 | Apr 1994 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0141 D02 III | 2 | 2 | $500 | Apr 1994 | Jun 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 II | 2 | 2 | — | Apr 1994 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 F02 | 1 | 1 | $11,000 | Jun 2011 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0002 A | 1 | 1 | $10,000 | Apr 1994 | Apr 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C03 | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Apr 1994 | Apr 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 G01 IA | 1 | 1 | $4,000 | Jun 2011 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0024 H | 1 | 1 | $3,000 | Jun 2011 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 B01 | 1 | 1 | $2,500 | Jun 2011 | Jun 2011 |
| 5A0001 | 1 | 1 | $2,500 | Apr 1994 | Apr 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0037 B01 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Jun 2011 | Jun 2011 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1030 D03 I | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Apr 1994 | Apr 1994 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3116 within MS. Peer group: 49 employers. This establishment has 83 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2010 | HEAD,MAINTENANCE,TRUCK,STRUCK BY,TRACTOR TRAILER,CONCUSSIONFatality | 1 | — | 1 |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 15+ years. Most recent activity: 15 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in MS — for MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15-CA-016572 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2002 | Sep 2002 | Closed | Region 15, New Orleans, Louisiana |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES 1301 JAMES STREET · HATTIESBURG, MS, 39401 | WaterTRI | Violation Identified QNCR 6 | 11 | 0 | — | Sep 2025 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
CPSC product recalls
Top hazard: The pourable gel fuel can ignite unexpectedly to the consumer and expel onto people and objects nearby when it is poured into a firepot that is still burning. This hazard can occur if the consumer does not see the flame or is not aware that the firepot is still ignited. Gel fuel that expels and ignites can pose fire and burn risks to consumers that can be fatal.. Most recent recall: 2011-10-11. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-12 | Referral | 4 | 3 | $14,750 | |
| 2010-12-17 | Accident | 10 | 7 | $48,750 | |
| 2010-03-09 | Planned | 15 | 15 | $12,000 | |
| 2005-04-26 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2004-03-24 | Monitoring | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-12-16 | Complaint | 2 | 2 | $2,138 | |
| 2002-05-21 | Complaint | 5 | 4 | $3,375 | |
| 2001-03-05 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2000-02-01 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1998-10-13 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1998-08-19 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1994-03-22 | Referral | 5 | 5 | $19,000 | |
| 1993-10-06 | Complaint | 20 | 10 | $12,000 | |
| 1993-10-06 | Complaint | 11 | 2 | $17,500 | |
| 1993-08-03 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1979-10-25 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1979-02-23 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-06-12 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-03-23 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1977-11-03 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1977-05-18 | Planned | 2 | — | $0 | |
| 1976-12-01 | Planned | 8 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in poultry processing within MS, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- WAYNE FARMS, LLCLAUREL — 4 federal enforcement records
- PECO FOODS, INC.CANTON — 4 federal enforcement records
- SANDERSON FARMS, INC.COLLINS — 3 federal enforcement records
- SOUTHERN HENSMOSELLE — 3 federal enforcement records
- SANDERSON FARMS, INC.LAUREL — 3 federal enforcement records
- KOCH FOODS OF MISSISSIPPI LLCMORTON — 3 federal enforcement records
- PECO FOODS, INC.SEBASTOPOL — 3 federal enforcement records
- KOCH FOODS OF MISSISSIPPI, LLCFOREST — 2 federal enforcement records
- PECO FOODSSEBASTOPOL — 2 federal enforcement records
- KOCH FOODSMORTON — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- Poultry ProcessingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in MSState-wide enforcement data
- Poultry Processing in MSIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES's OSHA violation history?
- MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES has 22 OSHA inspections on record with 83 violations and $129,513 in total penalties.
- How does MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES's safety record compare to its industry?
- MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES operates in the poultry processing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.4.
- Has MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES had any workplace fatalities?
- Yes. Federal records show 1 fatality investigation involving MARSHALL DURBIN COMPANIES.