Establishment profile
GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT
75 EASTERN POINT ROAD, GROTON, CT, 06340
Operated by General Dynamics · 1 of 368 establishments
336611 — Ship Building and Repairing
Summary
GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT has accumulated 502 OSHA violations across 73 inspections over 53 years of recorded history, with $309,545 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 31 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 3 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
62% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 25 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 153 citations in this view · $155,250 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5A0001 | 17 | 7 | $14,530 | Mar 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0051 A | 16 | 16 | $10,350 | Jun 1976 | Sep 1981 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0043 A | 15 | 12 | $9,800 | Jul 1977 | Sep 1981 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0042 A03 | 12 | 10 | $8,500 | Aug 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0041 I01 | 11 | 11 | $15,080 | Nov 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0041 I03 | 7 | 7 | $11,400 | Jul 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0047 C | 7 | 7 | $11,300 | Apr 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0036 E | 7 | 7 | $9,070 | Jun 1976 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0043 E | 7 | 7 | $3,530 | Aug 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 A | 6 | 6 | $13,960 | Jun 1978 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0043 C | 6 | 5 | $9,600 | Jul 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0041 I05 | 6 | 6 | $500 | Jul 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0041 J01 | 5 | 4 | $8,800 | Aug 1978 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 5 | 5 | $2,430 | Sep 1973 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0309 A 011022 | 5 | 5 | $1,030 | Nov 1973 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1000 E | 5 | 4 | — | Feb 1973 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0041 I02 | 4 | 4 | $9,000 | Nov 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0041 J03 | 4 | 4 | $7,000 | Aug 1978 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0047 B | 4 | 4 | $5,680 | Jul 1977 | Oct 1979 |
| 29 CFR 1916.0033 C01 | 4 | 4 | $3,690 | Jun 1976 | Oct 1979 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3366 within CT. Peer group: 31 employers. This establishment has 502 OSHA violations; peer median is 0.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 12,015 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Sep 2021 – Sep 2022
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2022 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation | Fingertip(s) | Amputation | |
| Sep 25, 2021 | Struck by discharged object or substance | Multiple body parts, n.e.c. | Hospitalized |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 3+ years. Most recent activity: 3 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in CT — for General Dynamics, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other General Dynamics locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 10 cases · 9 ULP · 1 representation
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01-RC-304948 | Representation election | Oct 2022 | Oct 2022 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 01-CA-303918 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 2022 | Nov 2022 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 01-CA-303902 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 2022 | Nov 2022 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 01-CA-173646 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2016 | Jul 2016 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 01-CA-117252 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2013 | Feb 2014 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 34-CA-012945 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2011 | Jun 2013 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 34-CA-012355 | Unfair labor practice | May 2009 | Sep 2010 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 34-CA-012270 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2009 | Sep 2009 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 34-CA-009413 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 2000 | Jan 2001 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 34-CA-009303 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2000 | Sep 2003 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.
Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.
Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-08 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1983-12-09 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1983-01-27 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1982-10-14 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1982-08-12 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1982-06-08 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1981-12-04 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1981-11-30 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1981-10-30 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1981-09-03 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1981-09-03 | Complaint | 3 | — | $0 | |
| 1980-12-18 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1980-12-18 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1980-08-19 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1980-08-19 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $320 | |
| 1980-04-28 | Accident | 3 | 3 | $1,800 | |
| 1979-11-08 | Complaint | 6 | 1 | $300 | |
| 1979-11-01 | Complaint | 3 | — | $300 | |
| 1979-09-19 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1979-04-23 | Complaint | 30 | 17 | $18,350 | |
| 1979-04-20 | Complaint | 10 | 4 | $3,100 | |
| 1979-04-20 | Complaint | 139 | 38 | $211,890 | |
| 1979-01-03 | Complaint | 11 | 9 | $1,500 | |
| 1978-12-08 | Complaint | 7 | 3 | $1,000 | |
| 1978-12-06 | Complaint | 9 | 4 | $1,000 | |
| 1978-11-21 | Complaint | 14 | 7 | $1,000 | |
| 1978-10-21 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-10-17 | Complaint | 28 | 11 | $24,530 | |
| 1978-10-11 | Follow-up | 10 | — | $7,200 | |
| 1978-10-04 | Complaint | 9 | 8 | $1,200 | |
| 1978-10-04 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-09-27 | Complaint | 10 | 1 | $1,000 | |
| 1978-07-07 | Follow-up | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-05-16 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-05-08 | Complaint | 25 | 4 | $1,680 | |
| 1978-04-26 | Complaint | 7 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-04-11 | Complaint | 43 | 13 | $11,330 | |
| 1978-04-10 | Complaint | 4 | 3 | $280 | |
| 1978-04-04 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-03-30 | Complaint | 23 | 17 | $15,055 | |
| 1978-03-13 | Complaint | 7 | — | $0 | |
| 1978-03-13 | Complaint | 4 | — | $0 | |
| 1977-12-30 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1977-11-17 | Complaint | 6 | — | $0 | |
| 1977-08-11 | Complaint | 5 | — | $0 | |
| 1977-07-18 | Complaint | 5 | 2 | $480 | |
| 1977-06-30 | Complaint | 7 | — | $0 | |
| 1977-04-04 | Complaint | 8 | 4 | $2,200 | |
| 1977-03-09 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $630 | |
| 1977-02-23 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $100 | |
| 1976-12-01 | Complaint | 6 | 1 | $1,050 | |
| 1976-08-12 | Complaint | 5 | 2 | $1,400 | |
| 1976-06-28 | Complaint | 1 | — | $90 | |
| 1976-06-26 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1976-04-20 | Complaint | 8 | — | $300 | |
| 1976-03-19 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1976-03-12 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1976-03-12 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1976-02-11 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1976-02-11 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1975-12-10 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1975-05-08 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1975-04-09 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1975-03-11 | Planned | 2 | — | $0 | |
| 1974-04-15 | Complaint | 7 | — | $60 | |
| 1974-03-25 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1974-02-05 | Planned | 7 | — | $90 | |
| 1973-11-07 | Complaint | 7 | — | $130 | |
| 1973-10-16 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1973-09-11 | Planned | 14 | — | $180 | |
| 1973-08-28 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1972-12-19 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1972-08-03 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT is one of 368 establishments rolled up under the parent organization General Dynamics.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of General Dynamics across all 368 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in ship building and repairing within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATIONGROTON — 3 federal enforcement records
- THAMES SHIPYARD & REPAIR COMPANY, INC.NEW LONDON — 2 federal enforcement records
- BUCHANAN MARINE LPNEW HAVEN — 2 federal enforcement records
- GENERAL DYNAMICS, ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISIONGROTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- CHRISTIAN CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATEDBRIDGEPORT — 1 federal enforcement record
- INTERSTATE NAVIGATION COMPANYUNCASVILLE — 1 federal enforcement record
- HILLER SYSTEMS INCORPORATEDBRIDGEPORT — 1 federal enforcement record
- Q.C.I. MARINE OFF-SHORE LLCBRIDGEPORT — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by General Dynamics, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- GENERAL DYNAMICS NASSCOSAN DIEGO, CA — 3 federal enforcement records
- GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOATNorth Kingstown, RI — 3 federal enforcement records
- BATH IRON WORKSBATH, ME — 3 federal enforcement records
- ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATIONGROTON, CT — 3 federal enforcement records
- GENERAL DYNAMICS NASSCONATIONAL CITY, CA — 2 federal enforcement records
- GENERAL DYNAMICS BATH IRON WORKSBATH, ME — 2 federal enforcement records
- General DynamicsTacoma, WA — 2 federal enforcement records
- GULFSTREAM AEROSPACEAPPLETON, WI — 2 federal enforcement records
- GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYNORFOLK, VA — 2 federal enforcement records
- GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.LONGISLAND, NC — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All General Dynamics locationsParent rollup
- Ship Building and RepairingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in CTState-wide enforcement data
- Ship Building and in CTIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup General Dynamics, which operates 368 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT's OSHA violation history?
- GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT has 73 OSHA inspections on record with 502 violations and $309,545 in total penalties.
- How does GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT's safety record compare to its industry?
- GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT operates in the ship building and repairing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.8. GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT's self-reported DART rate is 2.39 compared to an industry average of 3.2.
- Has GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT had any workplace fatalities?
- Yes. Federal records show 3 fatality investigations involving GENERAL DYNAMICS ELECTRIC BOAT.