Establishment profile
FRITO LAY, INC.
1886 UPPER MAPLE STREET, DAYVILLE, CT, 06241
Operated by FRITO LAY INC · 1 of 137 establishments
311919 — Other Snack Food Manufacturing
EIN 270659583
Summary
FRITO LAY, INC. has accumulated 29 OSHA violations across 15 inspections over 45 years of recorded history, with $38,887 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 27 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 6 months ago.
Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
FRITO LAY, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
73% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 7 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 23 citations in this view · $38,887 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C02 I | 2 | 2 | $1,938 | Mar 1994 | Apr 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I | 2 | 2 | $1,400 | Mar 1994 | Apr 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 II | 2 | 2 | — | Mar 1994 | Apr 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 F03 | 1 | 1 | $10,050 | Sep 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0135 A01 | 1 | 1 | $8,040 | May 2026 | May 2026 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0145 C02 I | 1 | 1 | $6,464 | Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 1 | 1 | $2,400 | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1030 F02 I | 1 | 1 | $1,400 | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 1 | 1 | $1,400 | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 B07 | 1 | 1 | $1,400 | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1904.0040 A | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0024 F | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 D | 1 | 1 | $975 | Jul 1996 | Jul 1996 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C03 | 1 | 1 | $420 | May 1985 | May 1985 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 Q06 | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 2005 | Mar 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C04 I | 1 | 1 | — | Apr 1999 | Apr 1999 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0333 B02 I | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E02 II | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 G08 | 1 | 1 | — | Mar 1994 | Mar 1994 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3119 within CT. Peer group: 27 employers. This establishment has 29 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 842 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jun 2015 – Jun 2025 · 2 in last 5 years
Most frequent event: Caught, entangled in running powered equipment normal operation
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2025 | Caught, entangled in running powered equipment normal operation | Finger or thumb tip(s), nail(s) | Amputation | |
| Mar 23, 2024 | Collision with stationary object, nonroadway | Other finger(s) n.e.c. | Amputation | |
| Aug 12, 2020 | Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment | Fingertip(s) | Amputation | |
| Jan 3, 2016 | Fall on same level, n.e.c. | Hip(s) | Hospitalized | |
| Jun 20, 2015 | Other fall to lower level less than 6 feet | Back, including spine, spinal cord, unspecified | Hospitalized |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1994 | MAINTENANCE,BELT,CRUSHED,CONVEYOR,NECK,MACHINE--MISCFatality | 1 | — | 1 | |
| Mar 11, 1985 | GUARDRAIL,LOCKOUT,CRUSHED,FALL,MECH MAT HANDLINGFatality | 1 | — | 1 |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 6 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for FRITO LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for FRITO LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in CT — for FRITO LAY INC, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other FRITO LAY INC locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 7 cases · 7 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01-CA-391607 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2026 | — | Open | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 01-CA-340192 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2024 | Aug 2024 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 01-CA-339006 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2024 | Aug 2024 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 01-CA-182740 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2016 | Oct 2016 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 34-CA-010045 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2002 | May 2004 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 34-CA-008742 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 1999 | Aug 2003 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
| 34-CA-008604 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 1998 | Aug 2003 | Closed | Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for FRITO LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRITO-LAY 1886 UPPER MAPLE ST · KILLINGLY (DAYVILLE), CT, 06241 | AirWaterRCRATRI | Violation Identified QNCR 9 | 8 | 0 | — | Jul 2026 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-10 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $8,040 | |
| 2025-06-10 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $10,050 | |
| 2024-08-08 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $6,464 | |
| 2018-05-14 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2005-02-09 | Planned | 2 | 1 | $1,000 | |
| 1999-03-19 | Planned | 2 | — | $0 | |
| 1999-02-02 | Planned | 2 | — | $938 | |
| 1996-07-18 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1996-06-10 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $975 | |
| 1994-01-15 | Accident | 15 | 10 | $11,000 | |
| 1986-04-01 | Referral | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1985-04-02 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1985-03-12 | Accident | 2 | 1 | $420 | |
| 1983-03-22 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1981-04-09 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
FRITO LAY, INC. is one of 137 establishments rolled up under the parent organization FRITO LAY INC.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of FRITO LAY INC across all 137 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in other snack food manufacturing within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- INTERNATIONAL PROVISIONS INCHAMDEN — 2 federal enforcement records
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by FRITO LAY INC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- FRITO-LAY, INC.MODESTO, CA — 4 federal enforcement records
- FRITO-LAY INC.FRANKFORT, IN — 4 federal enforcement records
- FRITO-LAY INCVANCOUVER, WA — 3 federal enforcement records
- FRITO-LAY INC.SAN ANTONIO, TX — 3 federal enforcement records
- FRITO LAYROSENBERG, TX — 3 federal enforcement records
- FRITO-LAY, INC.BELOIT, WI — 3 federal enforcement records
- FRITO LAY INCKIRKWOOD, NY — 3 federal enforcement records
- FRITO-LAY INCTOPEKA, KS — 3 federal enforcement records
- FRITO-LAY, INC.TOPEKA, KS — 3 federal enforcement records
- FRITO LAY INCPONTIAC, MI — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All FRITO LAY INC locationsParent rollup
- Other Snack Food ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in CTState-wide enforcement data
- Other Snack Food in CTIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on FRITO LAY, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup FRITO LAY INC, which operates 137 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is FRITO LAY, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- FRITO LAY, INC. has 15 OSHA inspections on record with 29 violations and $38,886.5 in total penalties.
- How does FRITO LAY, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- FRITO LAY, INC. operates in the other snack food manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.1. FRITO LAY, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 3.09 compared to an industry average of 2.1.
- Has FRITO LAY, INC. had any workplace fatalities?
- Yes. Federal records show 2 fatality investigations involving FRITO LAY, INC..