Skip to main content

Establishment profile

FRITO LAY, INC.

1886 UPPER MAPLE STREET, DAYVILLE, CT, 06241
Operated by FRITO LAY INC · 1 of 137 establishments
311919Other Snack Food Manufacturing
EIN 270659583

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
15
over 45 years
Violations
29
$38,887 in penalties
Penalties
$38,887
$1,341 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
2 fatalities · 3 National Emphasis Program inspections · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

FRITO LAY, INC. has accumulated 29 OSHA violations across 15 inspections over 45 years of recorded history, with $38,887 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 27 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 6 months ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

FRITO LAY, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
15
0.3 / yr · last 45 yrs
Violations
29
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$38,887
$1,341 avg / violation
55% serious45% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
6 of 15
Inspection trigger · planned
4 of 15

73% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 7 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 23 citations in this view · $38,887 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0219 C02 I22$1,938Mar 1994Apr 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I22$1,400Mar 1994Apr 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 II22Mar 1994Apr 1999
29 CFR 1910.0219 F0311$10,050Sep 2025Sep 2025
29 CFR 1910.0135 A0111$8,040May 2026May 2026
29 CFR 1910.0145 C02 I11$6,464Dec 2024Dec 2024
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0111$2,400Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.1030 F02 I11$1,400Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0151 C11$1,400Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0134 B0711$1,400Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1904.0040 A11$1,000Mar 2005Mar 2005
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0111$1,000Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0024 F11$1,000Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0147 D11$975Jul 1996Jul 1996
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0311$420May 1985May 1985
29 CFR 1910.0178 Q0611Mar 2005Mar 2005
29 CFR 1910.0219 C04 I11Apr 1999Apr 1999
29 CFR 1910.0333 B02 I11Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0106 E02 II11Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.1200 G0811Mar 1994Mar 1994

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

100th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3119 within CT. Peer group: 27 employers. This establishment has 29 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
100th
peer median: $2,075
Inspection frequency
100th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
3.1
vs industry
+1.0
TRIR
3.8
vs industry
+0.7

Reported for 842 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.1
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
3.8
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
4
Complaint
6
Accident
2
Referral
3

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jun 2015 – Jun 2025 · 2 in last 5 years

Reports
5
Hospitalizations
3
Amputations
3
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught, entangled in running powered equipment normal operation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Jun 8, 2025Caught, entangled in running powered equipment normal operationFinger or thumb tip(s), nail(s)Amputation
Mar 23, 2024Collision with stationary object, nonroadwayOther finger(s) n.e.c.Amputation
Aug 12, 2020Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipmentFingertip(s)Amputation
Jan 3, 2016Fall on same level, n.e.c.Hip(s)Hospitalized
Jun 20, 2015Other fall to lower level less than 6 feetBack, including spine, spinal cord, unspecifiedHospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Jan 14, 1994MAINTENANCE,BELT,CRUSHED,CONVEYOR,NECK,MACHINE--MISCFatality11
Mar 11, 1985GUARDRAIL,LOCKOUT,CRUSHED,FALL,MECH MAT HANDLINGFatality11

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
6 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 6 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for FRITO LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for FRITO LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CT — for FRITO LAY INC, not this location alone

Total cases
7
Unfair labor practice
7

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other FRITO LAY INC locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 7 cases · 7 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
01-CA-391607Unfair labor practiceJul 2026OpenRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-340192Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-339006Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-182740Unfair labor practiceAug 2016Oct 2016ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-010045Unfair labor practiceMar 2002May 2004ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-008742Unfair labor practiceMar 1999Aug 2003ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-008604Unfair labor practiceDec 1998Aug 2003ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for FRITO LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
8
Quarters non-compliant
9

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: Violation Identified.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
FRITO-LAY
1886 UPPER MAPLE ST · KILLINGLY (DAYVILLE), CT, 06241
AirWaterRCRATRIViolation Identified
QNCR 9
80Jul 2026View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2026-02-10Complaint11$8,040
2025-06-10Referral11$10,050
2024-08-08Complaint11$6,464
2018-05-14Complaint0$0
2005-02-09Planned21$1,000
1999-03-19Planned2$0
1999-02-02Planned2$938
1996-07-18Referral0$0
1996-06-10Complaint11$975
1994-01-15Accident1510$11,000
1986-04-01Referral1$0
1985-04-02Complaint1$0
1985-03-12Accident21$420
1983-03-22Planned0$0
1981-04-09Complaint0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

FRITO LAY, INC. is one of 137 establishments rolled up under the parent organization FRITO LAY INC.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of FRITO LAY INC across all 137 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in other snack food manufacturing within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by FRITO LAY INC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on FRITO LAY, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup FRITO LAY INC, which operates 137 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is FRITO LAY, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
FRITO LAY, INC. has 15 OSHA inspections on record with 29 violations and $38,886.5 in total penalties.
How does FRITO LAY, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
FRITO LAY, INC. operates in the other snack food manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.1. FRITO LAY, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 3.09 compared to an industry average of 2.1.
Has FRITO LAY, INC. had any workplace fatalities?
Yes. Federal records show 2 fatality investigations involving FRITO LAY, INC..