Skip to main content

Establishment profile

FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER

1349 S. HWY 61, FESTUS, MO, 63028
Operated by SHAFIQ MALIK · 1 of 8 establishments
623110Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities)
EIN 431528022

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 26 years
Violations
7
$1,875 in penalties
Penalties
$1,875
$268 avg
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER has accumulated 7 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 26 years of recorded history, with $1,875 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 89th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 245 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 67th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 22 years ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER appears in OSHA workplace safety and CMS nursing home enforcement records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 26 yrs
Violations
7
0.3 / yr
Penalties
$1,875
$268 avg / violation
71% serious29% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 2
Inspection trigger · planned
1 of 2

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 6 distinct standards shown · 7 citations in this view · $1,875 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.1030 D02 I22$625Jul 2000Jan 2004
29 CFR 1910.1030 C01 IV11$875Jan 2004Jan 2004
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$375Jul 2000Jul 2000
29 CFR 1910.1030 H05 I11Jan 2004Jan 2004
29 CFR 1910.1200 H03 III11Jan 2004Jan 2004
29 CFR 1904.0005 C11Jul 2000Jul 2000

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

89th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 6231 within MO. Peer group: 245 employers. This establishment has 7 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
70th
peer median: $563
Inspection frequency
67th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
2.6
vs industry
−1.9
TRIR
7.9
vs industry
+1.6

Reported for 100 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
6.3
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
4.5
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
7.9
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
22 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 22+ years. Most recent activity: 22 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

CMS nursing-home record

CCN 265654 · Chain: SHAFIQ MALIK

CMS abuse icon
Overall rating
3 of 5 stars
Certified beds
116
Deficiencies (3y)
11
CMS fines
$0

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (Care Compare) — health-inspection deficiencies, fines, and ratings. Full nursing-home record →

CMS Care Compare deficiencies

Every Health Deficiency citation issued by CMS surveyors during this facility’s annual and complaint-triggered surveys. F-tags reference 42 CFR 483 regulatory requirements (resident rights, staffing, infection control, medication management, etc.). Scope-severity letters grade citations from A (isolated potential harm) through L (widespread immediate jeopardy); immediate-jeopardy citations are the critical signal. 20 citations across 4 surveys · 1 complaint-triggered.

Survey dateF-TagSeverityDescriptionTypeCorrected
Feb 20260584E
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Standard
Feb 20260600D
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Standard
Feb 20260656D
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Standard
Feb 20260699D
Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Standard
Feb 20260755D
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Standard
Feb 20260880D
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Infection Control Deficiencies
Standard
Feb 20260921D
Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Environmental Deficiencies
Standard
Feb 20260947D
Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies
Standard
Sep 20240584E
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Standard
Sep 20240925E
Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Environmental Deficiencies
Standard
Sep 20240607D
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Standard
Jul 20230684D
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Complaint
Jun 20230812F
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Standard
Jun 20230868E
Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Administration Deficiencies
Standard
Jun 20230570D
Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Standard
Jun 20230582D
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Standard
Jun 20230623D
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Standard
Jun 20230636D
Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Standard
Jun 20230638D
Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Standard
Jun 20230640D
Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Standard

Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies dataset. Standard survey citations come from routine annual inspections; complaint citations come from CMS investigations of resident or family complaints; infection control citations come from focused infection-prevention surveys. F-tag definitions are at cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/nursinghomequalityinits.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2003-12-11Complaint43$875
2000-06-27Planned32$1,000

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER is one of 8 establishments rolled up under the parent organization SHAFIQ MALIK.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of SHAFIQ MALIK across all 8 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in nursing care facilities (skilled nursing facilities) within MO, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by SHAFIQ MALIK, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup SHAFIQ MALIK, which operates 8 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER's OSHA violation history?
FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 7 violations and $1,875 in total penalties.
How does FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER's safety record compare to its industry?
FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER operates in the nursing care facilities (skilled nursing facilities) industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 6.3. FOUNTAINBLEAU NURSING CENTER's self-reported DART rate is 2.63 compared to an industry average of 4.5.