Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

FIRST TRANSIT INC.

5621 ALAN BOYD DR., SACRAMENTO, CA, 95837
485113 — Bus and Other Motor Vehicle Transit Systems

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 7 years
Violations
1
$375 in penalties
Penalties
$375
$375 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

FIRST TRANSIT INC. has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 7 years of recorded history, with $375 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 39th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 254 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

FIRST TRANSIT INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.1 / yr · last 7 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$375
$375 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $375 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
3328(E)11$375Mar 2019Mar 2019

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

39th

Below average violations in NAICS 4851 within CA. Peer group: 254 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
54th
peer median: $245
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
11.5
vs industry
+6.8
TRIR
11.5
vs industry
+5.4

Reported for 148 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
6.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
4.7
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
11.5
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for FIRST TRANSIT INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
7 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for FIRST TRANSIT INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for FIRST TRANSIT INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for FIRST TRANSIT INC., not this location alone

Total cases
92
Unfair labor practice
51
Representation (union)
38

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other FIRST TRANSIT INC. locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 92 cases · 51 ULP · 38 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
31-CA-317692Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Mar 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-317638Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Mar 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-305417Unfair labor practiceOct 2022May 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-296440Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Dec 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RD-287959Representation electionDec 2021Dec 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-285440Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Jan 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-281570Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-280796Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-280628Unfair labor practiceJul 2021Oct 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-280626Unfair labor practiceJul 2021Oct 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-280621Unfair labor practiceJul 2021Mar 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-278823Unfair labor practiceJun 2021Mar 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-278772Unfair labor practiceJun 2021Mar 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-277565Unfair labor practiceMay 2021Jul 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-276379Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Jul 2023ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-276376Unfair labor practiceApr 2021Oct 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RD-275777Representation electionApr 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-273925Representation electionMar 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-273344Representation electionFeb 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-RC-269224Representation electionNov 2020Jan 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-265327Representation electionAug 2020Nov 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-237700Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-237699Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-237596Unfair labor practiceMar 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-235141Unfair labor practiceJan 2019May 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-234602Unfair labor practiceJan 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-234606Unfair labor practiceJan 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-234603Unfair labor practiceJan 2019Mar 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-230623Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Aug 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-230622Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Apr 2020ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-225395Representation electionAug 2018Sep 2018ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-222902Representation electionJun 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-220150Representation electionMay 2018Jun 2018ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-218508Unfair labor practiceApr 2018May 2019ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-217514Representation electionMar 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-RC-213114Representation electionJan 2018Feb 2018ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-204301Representation electionAug 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-197409Representation electionApr 2017May 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-193734Representation electionFeb 2017Mar 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-193731Representation electionFeb 2017Mar 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-192965Representation electionFeb 2017Mar 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-185798Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-185590Representation electionOct 2016Oct 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-183630Unfair labor practiceSep 2016Mar 2020ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-176336Representation electionMay 2016Jun 2016ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RD-173473Representation electionApr 2016Apr 2016ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-RC-171296Representation electionMar 2016Apr 2016ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-166803Unfair labor practiceDec 2015Jun 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-158290Unfair labor practiceAug 2015Nov 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-155765Unfair labor practiceJul 2015Sep 2015ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-150874Representation electionApr 2015May 2015ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-150562Unfair labor practiceApr 2015Jul 2015ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-147424Representation electionMar 2015Jan 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-146847Representation electionFeb 2015Mar 2015ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-141549Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Dec 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-141230Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Dec 2014ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-141227Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Oct 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-141009Representation electionNov 2014Nov 2014ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-140952Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Dec 2015ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-138421Unfair labor practiceAug 2014Oct 2014ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-110810Representation electionAug 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-107840Unfair labor practiceJun 2013Jun 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-106092Unfair labor practiceMay 2013Jul 2013ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-102816Unfair labor practiceApr 2013Dec 2013ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-081954Representation electionMay 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-069636Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Dec 2011ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-030291Unfair labor practiceJul 2011Aug 2011ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-021288Representation electionMar 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-UC-000440UCMar 2011Mar 2011ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-005800Representation electionOct 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-005798Representation electionOct 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-005790Representation electionSep 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-UC-000436UCJul 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-021178Representation electionDec 2009Feb 2010ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-034576Unfair labor practiceJul 2009Nov 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-034553Unfair labor practiceJun 2009Jul 2009ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-RC-021121Representation electionMar 2009Mar 2009ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-021108Representation electionFeb 2009Mar 2009ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-021106Representation electionFeb 2009Mar 2009ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-021095Representation electionNov 2008Dec 2008ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-021089Representation electionOct 2008Dec 2008ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028849Unfair labor practiceAug 2008May 2010ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-028796Unfair labor practiceJun 2008Aug 2009ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-021050Representation electionMay 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
25-CA-030680Unfair labor practiceApr 2008Jul 2008ClosedRegion 25, Indianapolis, Indiana
21-CA-038330Unfair labor practiceApr 2008May 2008ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-038212Unfair labor practiceFeb 2008Oct 2008ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
17-CA-024087Unfair labor practiceFeb 2008Apr 2008ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
21-RC-020998Representation electionNov 2007Jan 2008ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-037230Unfair labor practiceApr 2006Jun 2007ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-036317Unfair labor practiceMay 2004Nov 2004ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-UD-000382UDAug 2001Jun 2009ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for FIRST TRANSIT INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for FIRST TRANSIT INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for FIRST TRANSIT INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2018-10-19Complaint1—$375

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in bus and other motor vehicle transit systems within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on FIRST TRANSIT INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is FIRST TRANSIT INC.'s OSHA violation history?
FIRST TRANSIT INC. has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $375 in total penalties.
How does FIRST TRANSIT INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
FIRST TRANSIT INC. operates in the bus and other motor vehicle transit systems industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 6.1. FIRST TRANSIT INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 11.54 compared to an industry average of 4.7.