Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,

SERENO TRANSIT CENTER, SERENO DRIVE, VALLEJO, CA, 94589
Operated by MV Transportation · 1 of 53 establishments
485113 — Bus and Other Motor Vehicle Transit Systems
EIN 942491705

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 16 years
Violations
1
$600 in penalties
Penalties
$600
$600 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 hospitalizations

Summary

MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 2 inspections over 16 years of recorded history, with $600 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 38th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 254 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 70th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 15 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 16 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$600
$600 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 2
Inspection trigger · accident
1 of 2

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $600 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
3328 A11$600May 2010May 2010

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

38th

Below average violations in NAICS 4851 within CA. Peer group: 254 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
62nd
peer median: $275
Inspection frequency
70th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
4.7
vs industry
0.0
TRIR
4.7
vs industry
−1.4

Reported for 19 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
6.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
4.7
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
4.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1
Accident
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Nov 12, 2009BUS,ABDOMEN,BRAKE,WORK RULES,DRIVER,INTERLOCK,TORSO,ENGINE,RUN OVER,DOOR11—

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
15 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 15+ years. Most recent activity: 15 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$4,626
Employees affected
14

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour breakdown by law

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 15 violations · $4,626 in backwages

StatutePeriodCasesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
FLSA — minimum wage & overtimeApr 201111514$4,626—

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 15 violations · $4,626 in backwages · 14 workers affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Apr 2009 – Apr 2011Regulation and Administration of Transportation ProgramsFLSA1514$4,626—

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for MV Transportation, not this location alone

Total cases
223
Unfair labor practice
124
Representation (union)
94

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other MV Transportation locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 61 ULP · 36 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
20-CA-387723Unfair labor practiceMay 2026—OpenRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-384583Unfair labor practiceApr 2026—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-361529Unfair labor practiceMar 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-353578Representation electionOct 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-345981Unfair labor practiceJul 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-UD-340151UDApr 2024Jun 2024ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-334095Unfair labor practiceJan 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-330971Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-326888Representation electionSep 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RD-325140Representation electionSep 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-320314Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-319039Representation electionMay 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-312134Representation electionFeb 2023Mar 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-303508Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Jan 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-301247Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-RC-299142Representation electionJul 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-294322Unfair labor practiceApr 2022—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-RC-293947Representation electionApr 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-RC-292557Representation electionMar 2022Apr 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-288950Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Mar 2022ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-284262Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Sep 2022ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-281084Unfair labor practiceAug 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-279636Unfair labor practiceJul 2021Dec 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-UC-279131UCJun 2021Dec 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-278637Unfair labor practiceJun 2021Sep 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-278369Unfair labor practiceJun 2021Aug 2021ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-RC-276059Representation electionApr 2021Jun 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-275798Representation electionApr 2021Jun 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-269762Representation electionDec 2020Mar 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-268869Representation electionNov 2020Jan 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-268614Unfair labor practiceNov 2020Nov 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-262406Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Oct 2020ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-258992Unfair labor practiceApr 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-258445Unfair labor practiceMar 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-UD-255742UDJan 2020Mar 2020ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-255054Representation electionJan 2020Feb 2020ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-RC-254670Representation electionJan 2020Feb 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-RC-251545Representation electionNov 2019Dec 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-251034Representation electionNov 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-250793Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Aug 2020ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-247171Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Feb 2020ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-246807Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Jul 2021ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-245775Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-245213Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-245207Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Oct 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-243742Unfair labor practiceJun 2019Dec 2021ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-241693Unfair labor practiceMay 2019Jun 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-241491Unfair labor practiceMay 2019Jul 2019ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-239751Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Jun 2019ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-228190Unfair labor practiceSep 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-223892Unfair labor practiceJul 2018Oct 2018ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-223372Unfair labor practiceJul 2018Aug 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-220993Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-RC-220582Representation electionMay 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-217992Unfair labor practiceApr 2018Jun 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-217273Representation electionMar 2018Apr 2018ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-217104Unfair labor practiceMar 2018Jun 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-RC-210640Representation electionNov 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-RC-209374Representation electionNov 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-209333Representation electionNov 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-204652Representation electionAug 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-204192Representation electionAug 2017Aug 2017ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-204109Representation electionAug 2017Aug 2017ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-202976Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Aug 2019ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-199043Unfair labor practiceMay 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-197781Unfair labor practiceApr 2017May 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-197517Representation electionApr 2017May 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-196760Unfair labor practiceApr 2017May 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-192784Representation electionFeb 2017Mar 2017ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-RC-192605Representation electionFeb 2017Mar 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-191225Representation electionJan 2017Feb 2017ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-190775Representation electionJan 2017Jan 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-187261Representation electionOct 2016Nov 2016ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-182315Unfair labor practiceAug 2016Oct 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-177798Unfair labor practiceJun 2016Sep 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-176897Representation electionMay 2016Jun 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-175127Unfair labor practiceApr 2016Oct 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-175126Unfair labor practiceApr 2016Oct 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-RC-173353Representation electionApr 2016May 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-171976Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-171975Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Jul 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-171974Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Jul 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-171973Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Jul 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-171971Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Nov 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-171969Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Oct 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-RC-170916Representation electionMar 2016May 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-170452Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016May 2016ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-169858Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016Apr 2016ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-169673Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016Oct 2017ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-169489Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-162934Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Jan 2016ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-RC-161229Representation electionOct 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-160571Unfair labor practiceSep 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-160196Representation electionSep 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-158287Unfair labor practiceAug 2015Nov 2015ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-156750Unfair labor practiceJul 2015Oct 2015ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-156345Unfair labor practiceJul 2015Aug 2015ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-150217Unfair labor practiceApr 2015Jan 2016ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-148740Unfair labor practiceMar 2015Apr 2015ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-RC-146370Representation electionFeb 2015Feb 2015ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2010-01-25Accident1—$600
2009-12-01Complaint0—$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., is one of 53 establishments rolled up under the parent organization MV Transportation.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of MV Transportation across all 53 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in bus and other motor vehicle transit systems within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by MV Transportation, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup MV Transportation, which operates 53 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,'s OSHA violation history?
MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 1 violation and $600 in total penalties.
How does MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,'s safety record compare to its industry?
MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., operates in the bus and other motor vehicle transit systems industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 6.1. MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.,'s self-reported DART rate is 4.7 compared to an industry average of 4.7.