Establishment profile
DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY
3214 HILLSBOROUGH RD., DURHAM, NC, 27705
Operated by Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Company · 1 of 3 establishments
312111 — Soft Drink Manufacturing
EIN 560207560
Summary
DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY has accumulated 78 OSHA violations across 7 inspections over 32 years of recorded history, with $37,037 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 127 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 94th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 14 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
71% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 26 citations in this view · $26,529 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0145 F03 | 2 | 2 | $3,000 | Aug 1994 | Feb 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 F03 | 2 | 2 | $1,738 | Aug 1994 | Oct 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 2 | 2 | $1,043 | Aug 1994 | Feb 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B02 | 2 | 2 | $688 | Aug 1994 | Feb 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 K01 | 2 | 2 | $450 | Feb 2002 | May 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 E05 | 2 | 1 | — | Oct 1994 | Oct 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 E01 | 1 | 1 | $2,100 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0101 B | 1 | 1 | $1,500 | May 2012 | May 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 D01 | 1 | 1 | $1,500 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 | 1 | 1 | $1,470 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 A04 | 1 | 1 | $1,470 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 B01 | 1 | 1 | $1,470 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 B01 | 1 | 1 | $1,470 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 B02 | 1 | 1 | $1,470 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F05 VC5 | 1 | 1 | $1,375 | Feb 2002 | Feb 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0334 A02 II | 1 | 1 | $1,375 | Feb 2002 | Feb 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0036 D02 | 1 | 1 | $1,260 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0304 F05 IVA | 1 | 1 | $1,050 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 E05 I | 1 | 1 | $1,050 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 1 | 1 | $1,050 | Aug 1994 | Aug 1994 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3121 within NC. Peer group: 127 employers. This establishment has 78 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 156 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 14+ years. Most recent activity: 14 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-03-07 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2012-02-03 | Planned | 4 | 4 | $3,750 | |
| 2003-05-06 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-01-08 | Planned | 25 | 19 | $8,446 | |
| 1998-09-22 | Planned | 3 | 2 | $1,651 | |
| 1994-07-28 | Referral | 9 | — | $0 | |
| 1994-05-17 | Planned | 37 | 26 | $23,190 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY is one of 3 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Company.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Company across all 3 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in soft drink manufacturing within NC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- PEPSI BOTTLING VENTURES LLCRALEIGH — 2 federal enforcement records
- PEPSI BOTTLING VENTURES LLCWINSTON-SALEM — 2 federal enforcement records
- THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC.CHARLOTTE — 2 federal enforcement records
- PEPSI BOTTLING VENTURES LLCWINSTON SALEM — 2 federal enforcement records
- PEPSI BOTTLING VENTURES, LLCWILMINGTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- PEPSI BOTTLING VENTURES, LLCGARNER — 2 federal enforcement records
- COTT BEVERAGES USA INCWILSON — 2 federal enforcement records
- PRIME BEVERAGE GROUP, LLCCONCORD — 1 federal enforcement record
- NATIONAL FRUIT PRODUCT COMPANY, INC.LINCOLNTON — 1 federal enforcement record
- PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF CHARLOTTE, INC.CHERRYVILLE — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Company, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANYRALEIGH, NC — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Company locationsParent rollup
- Soft Drink ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in NCState-wide enforcement data
- Soft Drink Manufacturing in NCIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Company, which operates 3 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
- DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY has 7 OSHA inspections on record with 78 violations and $37,037 in total penalties.
- How does DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
- DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY operates in the soft drink manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 5.7. DURHAM COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 2.45 compared to an industry average of 4.7.