Skip to main content

Establishment profile

COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.

1135 PLEASANTVIEW TERRACE, RIDGEFIELD, NJ, 07000
Operated by Cosmetic Essence, LLC · 1 of 7 establishments
325620Toilet Preparation Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
4
over 25 years
Violations
16
$70,000 in penalties
SVEP
YES
Severe violator program
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

COSMETIC ESSENCE INC. has accumulated 16 OSHA violations across 4 inspections over 25 years of recorded history, with $70,000 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 85th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 136 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 83rd percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 23 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

COSMETIC ESSENCE INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
4
0.2 / yr · last 25 yrs
Violations
16
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$70,000
$4,375 avg / violation
94% serious6% other
Inspection trigger · referral
2 of 4
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 4

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 16 distinct standards shown · 16 citations in this view · $70,000 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0178 L01 I11$44,000Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0146 C0411$3,300Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0106 D04 I11$3,300Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0146 C0111$3,300Aug 2001Aug 2001
5A000111$3,150Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.1200 H0111$2,300Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0151 C11$2,300Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0111$1,575Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0178 L0611$1,575Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0178 M05 I11$1,575Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0178 G0211$1,500Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0134 C0111$1,500Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 II11$625Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 I11Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I11Aug 2001Aug 2001
29 CFR 1910.0147 C05 I11Aug 2001Aug 2001

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

85th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3256 within NJ. Peer group: 136 employers. This establishment has 16 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
97th
peer median: $2,981
Inspection frequency
83rd
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.9
vs industry
−0.6
TRIR
1.4
vs industry
−0.5

Reported for 558 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.9
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.5
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
1.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1
Referral
2
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
23 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 23+ years. Most recent activity: 23 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in NJ — for Cosmetic Essence, LLC, not this location alone

Total cases
5
Unfair labor practice
5

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Cosmetic Essence, LLC locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 5 cases · 5 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
22-CA-140638Unfair labor practiceNov 2014Jan 2015ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-061815Unfair labor practiceJul 2011Sep 2011ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-029943Unfair labor practiceApr 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-029913Unfair labor practiceMar 2011May 2011ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-028225Unfair labor practiceJan 2008Mar 2008ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2003-03-25Complaint0$0
2003-03-25Follow-up0$0
2001-02-27Referral77$17,500
2001-02-27Referral98$52,500

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

COSMETIC ESSENCE INC. is one of 7 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Cosmetic Essence, LLC.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Cosmetic Essence, LLC across all 7 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in toilet preparation manufacturing within NJ, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Cosmetic Essence, LLC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on COSMETIC ESSENCE INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Cosmetic Essence, LLC, which operates 7 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.'s OSHA violation history?
COSMETIC ESSENCE INC. has 4 OSHA inspections on record with 16 violations and $70,000 in total penalties.
How does COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
COSMETIC ESSENCE INC. operates in the toilet preparation manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.9. COSMETIC ESSENCE INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0.86 compared to an industry average of 1.5.