Skip to main content

Establishment profile

CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.

1818 CO RD 160, WINESBURG, OH 44690, WINESBURG, OH, 44690
Operated by Case Farms · 1 of 12 establishments
311615Poultry Processing
EIN 560751341

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
14
over 15 years
Violations
116
$522,109 in penalties
SVEP
YES
Severe violator program
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
9 National Emphasis Program inspections · 22 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. has accumulated 116 OSHA violations across 14 inspections over 15 years of recorded history, with $522,109 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 112 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 96th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 months ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
14
0.9 / yr · last 15 yrs
Violations
116
7.7 / yr
Penalties
$522,109
$4,501 avg / violation
66% serious34% other
Inspection trigger · referral
5 of 14
Inspection trigger · follow-up
5 of 14

71% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 9 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 41 citations in this view · $251,853 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II33$23,425May 2015Feb 2024
29 CFR 1904.0004 A31$2,100Nov 2011Nov 2011
29 CFR 1904.0033 A31$700Nov 2011Nov 2011
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 II A21$33,100Feb 2024Feb 2024
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I22$23,042Dec 2011May 2015
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0122$19,050Dec 2011Feb 2024
29 CFR 1910.0219 F0322$18,800Dec 2011Feb 2024
29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 IV A22$18,550Dec 2011Feb 2024
29 CFR 1910.0147 C05 II D22$16,042Dec 2011Aug 2015
29 CFR 1910.0335 A01 I22$15,031Dec 2011Aug 2015
29 CFR 1910.0132 A22$12,031Dec 2011Aug 2015
29 CFR 1910.0119 J04 III22$8,347Dec 2011Dec 2015
29 CFR 1910.0335 B0122$5,438Dec 2011Aug 2015
29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 IV B22$3,438Dec 2011May 2015
29 CFR 1910.0176 B22$2,000Dec 2011Dec 2015
29 CFR 1903.0019 D0122$1,935Feb 2015Sep 2015
29 CFR 1904.0029 B0121$700Nov 2011Nov 2011
29 CFR 1910.0119 J04 IV22Dec 2011Dec 2015
29 CFR 1904.0029 B0211$24,063Feb 2016Feb 2016
29 CFR 1910.1030 F02 I11$24,063Dec 2015Dec 2015

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

100th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3116 within OH. Peer group: 112 employers. This establishment has 116 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
99th
peer median: $7,000
Inspection frequency
96th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.3
vs industry
−1.1
TRIR
0.7
vs industry
−1.7

Reported for 642 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
3
Complaint
1
Referral
5
Follow-up
5

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Oct 2021 – Mar 2024

Reports
2
Hospitalizations
0
Amputations
2
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Struck by or caught in swinging door or gate

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Mar 7, 2024Struck by running powered equipment during maintenance, cleaning, testingOther finger(s) n.e.c.Amputation
Oct 30, 2021Struck by or caught in swinging door or gateFingertip(s)Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
1 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in OH — for Case Farms, not this location alone

Total cases
32
Unfair labor practice
32

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Case Farms locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 32 cases · 32 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
08-CA-295489Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-245438Unfair labor practiceJul 2019Sep 2019ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-129183Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-127495Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Jun 2014ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-124654Unfair labor practiceMar 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-119747Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Feb 2014ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-112529Unfair labor practiceSep 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-112173Unfair labor practiceAug 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-105425Unfair labor practiceMay 2013Jul 2013ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-102025Unfair labor practiceApr 2013Jun 2013ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-098443Unfair labor practiceFeb 2013Jun 2013ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-072028Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Feb 2012ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-071214Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-071212Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-070945Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Jan 2012ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-039257Unfair labor practiceDec 2010Feb 2013ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-039187Unfair labor practiceOct 2010Feb 2013ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-039164Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-039153Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-039152Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Feb 2013ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-039119Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-039113Unfair labor practiceAug 2010Oct 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038864Unfair labor practiceMar 2010Apr 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038787Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Mar 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038758Unfair labor practiceJan 2010Apr 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038661Unfair labor practiceNov 2009Dec 2009ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038552Unfair labor practiceSep 2009Oct 2009ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038439Unfair labor practiceJul 2009Nov 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038412Unfair labor practiceJun 2009Nov 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038285Unfair labor practiceApr 2009Nov 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-038244Unfair labor practiceApr 2009Nov 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio
08-CA-037850Unfair labor practiceJul 2008Nov 2010ClosedRegion 08, Cleveland, Ohio

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2026-06-10Complaint0$0
2026-05-27Follow-up0$0
2024-03-13Referral0$0
2023-08-07Follow-up1412$231,700
2015-10-01Referral2$24,063
2015-06-10Follow-up74$51,066
2015-02-18Referral124$56,604
2015-02-10Referral0$0
2014-12-01Follow-up41$26,354
2014-12-01Follow-up3$3,438
2014-02-13Referral21$7,935
2011-06-30Planned3125$59,400
2011-06-30Planned3130$57,350
2011-06-30Planned10$4,200

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. is one of 12 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Case Farms.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Case Farms across all 12 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in poultry processing within OH, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Case Farms, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Case Farms, which operates 12 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. has 14 OSHA inspections on record with 116 violations and $522,109.3 in total penalties.
How does CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC. operates in the poultry processing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.4. CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0.29 compared to an industry average of 1.4.