Skip to main content

Establishment profile

ARAMARK

9601 GERMANTOWN AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA, PA, 19118
Operated by Aramark · 1 of 666 establishments
561210Facilities Support Services
EIN 208482253

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 8 years
Violations
1
$6,929 in penalties
Penalties
$6,929
$6,929 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

ARAMARK has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 8 years of recorded history, with $6,929 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 39th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 32 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 8 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

ARAMARK appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.1 / yr · last 8 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$6,929
$6,929 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $6,929 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.1001 J03 I11$6,929Nov 2018Nov 2018

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

39th

Below average violations in NAICS 5612 within PA. Peer group: 32 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
84th
peer median: $1,022
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
8.8
vs industry
+7.6
TRIR
12.8
vs industry
+10.7

Reported for 78 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
12.8
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for ARAMARK. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
8 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 8+ years. Most recent activity: 8 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for ARAMARK. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ARAMARK. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in PA — for Aramark, not this location alone

Total cases
70
Unfair labor practice
66
Representation (union)
4

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Aramark locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 70 cases · 66 ULP · 4 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
04-CA-387512Unfair labor practiceMay 2026OpenRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-365119Unfair labor practiceMay 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-360387Unfair labor practiceFeb 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-358865Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Feb 2025ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-334051Unfair labor practiceJan 2024Jan 2026ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-316642Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-292186Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Apr 2022ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-286651Unfair labor practiceNov 2021Apr 2022ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
06-CA-271430Unfair labor practiceJan 2021Jul 2023ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-250537Unfair labor practiceOct 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
04-CA-236356Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-RC-230531Representation electionNov 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-212258Unfair labor practiceDec 2017Apr 2018ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-204906Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-RC-187250Representation electionOct 2016Nov 2016ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
06-RC-181887Representation electionAug 2016Aug 2016ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
04-CA-180416Unfair labor practiceJul 2016Sep 2016ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-170923Unfair labor practiceMar 2016Mar 2016ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
06-CA-167238Unfair labor practiceJan 2016Mar 2016ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
04-CA-119934Unfair labor practiceJan 2014Mar 2014ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
06-CA-100618Unfair labor practiceMar 2013Apr 2013ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
02-CA-087100Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Nov 2013ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
06-CA-072686Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-072426Unfair labor practiceJan 2012Jan 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-071315Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-071304Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-070622Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-070618Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-070615Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069983Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069976Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069972Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069971Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069969Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069968Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069966Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069965Unfair labor practiceDec 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069617Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069602Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069407Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069403Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069398Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069395Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069311Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069308Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069306Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069304Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069302Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069301Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069299Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069298Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069295Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069294Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
06-CA-069293Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Dec 2011ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
04-CA-069132Unfair labor practiceNov 2011Feb 2012ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-065009Unfair labor practiceSep 2011Oct 2011ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
04-CA-037423Unfair labor practiceApr 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
02-CA-039444Unfair labor practiceAug 2009Mar 2010ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-039241Unfair labor practiceApr 2009Oct 2009ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
04-CA-036413Unfair labor practiceOct 2008Dec 2008ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
02-CA-038723Unfair labor practiceApr 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
04-CA-035936Unfair labor practiceFeb 2008Jun 2008ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
06-CA-035477Unfair labor practiceJan 2007Apr 2008ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
04-RD-002089Representation electionAug 2006Aug 2006ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
06-CA-034908Unfair labor practiceOct 2005Nov 2005ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
21-CA-036872Unfair labor practiceMay 2005Mar 2009ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
04-CA-032435Unfair labor practiceSep 2003Nov 2004ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
06-CA-032566Unfair labor practiceFeb 2002Apr 2002ClosedRegion 06, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
04-CA-030954Unfair labor practiceDec 2001May 2002ClosedRegion 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
02-CA-031238Unfair labor practiceFeb 1998Jan 2000ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ARAMARK. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ARAMARK. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ARAMARK. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Federal contracts

No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.

Company-wide — ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC (across 51 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$29K
Obligated (all-time)
$162.5M
Awards (all-time)
1,939

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2018-06-05Complaint1$6,929

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

ARAMARK is one of 666 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Aramark.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Aramark across all 666 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in facilities support services within PA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Aramark, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ARAMARK from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Aramark, which operates 666 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is ARAMARK's OSHA violation history?
ARAMARK has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $6,929.25 in total penalties.
How does ARAMARK's safety record compare to its industry?
ARAMARK operates in the facilities support services industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.1. ARAMARK's self-reported DART rate is 8.84 compared to an industry average of 1.2.