Establishment profile
WOODSTREAM CORPORATION
70 NORTH LOCUST STREET, LITITZ, PA, 17543
Operated by Woodstream Corporation · 1 of 4 establishments
325320 — Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing
EIN 230361930
Summary
WOODSTREAM CORPORATION has accumulated 42 OSHA violations across 9 inspections over 32 years of recorded history, with $53,166 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 25 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 5 years ago.
Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
WOODSTREAM CORPORATION appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, NLRB labor relations, FMCSA motor carrier registration, and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
78% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 6 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 26 citations in this view · $53,166 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 3 | 3 | $14,808 | Dec 1993 | Feb 2021 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 3 | 3 | $8,193 | Apr 2010 | Mar 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H03 | 2 | 2 | $11,925 | Sep 2012 | Mar 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0025 D01 X | 2 | 1 | — | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 5A0001 | 1 | 1 | $2,400 | Sep 2012 | Sep 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0307 B | 1 | 1 | $2,400 | Sep 2012 | Sep 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 G02 | 1 | 1 | $2,145 | Mar 2014 | Mar 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0095 I02 I | 1 | 1 | $2,100 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0095 B01 | 1 | 1 | $2,100 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 C02 IA | 1 | 1 | $1,155 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II | 1 | 1 | $825 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 C01 I | 1 | 1 | $660 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0133 A01 | 1 | 1 | $660 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 B02 | 1 | 1 | $660 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C01 | 1 | 1 | $660 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 G02 | 1 | 1 | $495 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 D09 IV | 1 | 1 | $495 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 E01 I | 1 | 1 | $495 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0333 B02 I | 1 | 1 | $495 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 E01 | 1 | 1 | $495 | Dec 1993 | Dec 1993 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3253 within PA. Peer group: 25 employers. This establishment has 42 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 225 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Sep 2020
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2020 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning | Fingertip(s) | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2020 | Amputated,Amputation,Finger,Interlock,Jammed,Started | 1 | — | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 5+ years. Most recent activity: 5 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 73 violations · $127 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLSA — minimum wage & overtime | Sep 2012 | 1 | 73 | 4 | $127 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 73 violations · $127 in backwages · 75 workers affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2010 – Sep 2012 | Convenience Stores | FLSA | 73 | 75 | $127 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for WOODSTREAM CORPORATION. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in PA — for Woodstream Corporation, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Woodstream Corporation locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 1 case · 1 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04-CA-163345 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 | Closed | Region 04, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for WOODSTREAM CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for WOODSTREAM CORPORATION. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for WOODSTREAM CORPORATION. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
CPSC product recalls
Top hazard: The recalled mosquito traps can become damaged if cleaning it while powered on with the company's Quick Clear Cartridge kits and can propel broken pieces of the regulator, posing an injury hazard to consumers.. Most recent recall: 2018-03-06. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.
CPSC recall roster
Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 1 recall shown · 1 distinct hazard categories.
| Recall | Date | Hazards | Units | CPSC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Woodstream Recalls Mosquito Magnet Traps Due to Injury Hazard #18114 | Mar 2018 | The recalled mosquito traps can become damaged if cleaning it while powered on with the company's Quick Clear Cartridge kits and can propel broken pieces of the regulator, posing an injury hazard to consumers. | — | View → |
Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-09 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $13,653 | |
| 2014-01-13 | Follow-up | 3 | 1 | $13,013 | |
| 2012-04-17 | Complaint | 4 | 3 | $13,000 | |
| 2010-02-18 | Planned | 2 | 2 | $1,050 | |
| 2005-08-09 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2001-01-05 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1994-05-10 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1993-10-28 | Referral | 6 | 4 | $4,200 | |
| 1993-10-15 | Complaint | 25 | 15 | $8,250 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
WOODSTREAM CORPORATION is one of 4 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Woodstream Corporation.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Woodstream Corporation across all 4 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by Woodstream Corporation, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- Woodstream CorporationMechanicsburg, PA — 2 federal enforcement records
- WOODSTREAM CORPORATIONELLENDALE, MN — 1 federal enforcement record
- WOODSTREAM CORPORATIONKNOXVILLE, TN — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All Woodstream Corporation locationsParent rollup
- Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in PAState-wide enforcement data
- Pesticide and Other in PAIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on WOODSTREAM CORPORATION from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Woodstream Corporation, which operates 4 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is WOODSTREAM CORPORATION's OSHA violation history?
- WOODSTREAM CORPORATION has 9 OSHA inspections on record with 42 violations and $53,166 in total penalties.
- How does WOODSTREAM CORPORATION's safety record compare to its industry?
- WOODSTREAM CORPORATION operates in the pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.9. WOODSTREAM CORPORATION's self-reported DART rate is 4.4 compared to an industry average of 1.4.