Skip to main content

Establishment profile

WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.

251 ROONEY RD, GOLDEN, CO, 80401
Operated by Williams Form Engineering · 1 of 7 establishments
332312Fabricated Structural Metal Manufacturing
EIN 381175280

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
9
over 25 years
Violations
24
$49,856 in penalties
SVEP
YES
Severe violator program
Accident investigations on record
8 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP. has accumulated 24 OSHA violations across 9 inspections over 25 years of recorded history, with $49,856 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 88th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 234 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 95th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 3 months ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP. appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
9
0.4 / yr · last 25 yrs
Violations
24
1.0 / yr
Penalties
$49,856
$2,077 avg / violation
67% serious33% other
Inspection trigger · planned
6 of 9
Inspection trigger · referral
3 of 9

78% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 6 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 22 citations in this view · $49,856 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I22$8,600Jun 2014Dec 2016
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0222$6,750Oct 2007Jun 2014
29 CFR 1910.0184 I09 IV11$11,934Feb 2019Feb 2019
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0111$9,647Jun 2026Jun 2026
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$4,200Jun 2016Jun 2016
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 II A11$3,300Jun 2016Jun 2016
5A000111$1,400Feb 2011Feb 2011
29 CFR 1910.0184 D11$1,400Feb 2011Feb 2011
29 CFR 1910.0184 I09 III11$1,000Jun 2014Jun 2014
29 CFR 1910.0147 C0111$875Oct 2007Oct 2007
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$750Oct 2007Oct 2007
29 CFR 1910.0212 B11Jun 2026Jun 2026
29 CFR 1910.1200 F0511Feb 2019Feb 2019
29 CFR 1910.0147 D11Dec 2016Dec 2016
29 CFR 1910.0147 C0811Dec 2016Dec 2016
29 CFR 1910.0147 C07 I11Dec 2016Dec 2016
29 CFR 1910.0132 F01 IV11Jun 2016Jun 2016
29 CFR 1910.0184 I09 III11Feb 2011Feb 2011
29 CFR 1910.1200 E0111Oct 2007Oct 2007
29 CFR 1910.1200 G0111Oct 2007Oct 2007

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

88th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3323 within CO. Peer group: 234 employers. This establishment has 24 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
97th
peer median: $2,752
Inspection frequency
95th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
8.1
vs industry
+6.3
TRIR
8.1
vs industry
+4.7

Reported for 40 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.8
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
8.1
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
6
Referral
3

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jun 2016 – Oct 2016

Reports
2
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
2
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Oct 7, 2016Injured by slipping or swinging object held by injured workerFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation
Jun 23, 2016Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipmentFinger(s), fingernail(s), unspecifiedAmputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
3 months ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 3 months ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2026-03-24Referral2$9,647
2021-05-20Planned0$0
2019-02-05Planned2$11,934
2016-10-11Referral44$8,600
2016-05-11Planned33$7,500
2014-06-05Planned33$6,000
2011-01-24Planned33$2,800
2007-10-19Planned73$3,375
2001-06-20Referral0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP. is one of 7 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Williams Form Engineering.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Williams Form Engineering across all 7 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in fabricated structural metal manufacturing within CO, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Williams Form Engineering, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Williams Form Engineering, which operates 7 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.'s OSHA violation history?
WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP. has 9 OSHA inspections on record with 24 violations and $49,856 in total penalties.
How does WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.'s safety record compare to its industry?
WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP. operates in the fabricated structural metal manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.4. WILLIAMS FORM ENGINEERING CORP.'s self-reported DART rate is 8.05 compared to an industry average of 1.8.