Skip to main content

Establishment profile

TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.

3239 SOUTH TRYON STREET, CHARLOTTE, NC, 28217
485113Bus and Other Motor Vehicle Transit Systems
EIN 561164899

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 15 years
Violations
9
$6,960 in penalties
SVEP
YES
Severe violator program
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC. has accumulated 9 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 15 years of recorded history, with $6,960 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 84th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 20 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 84th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 15 yrs
Violations
9
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$6,960
$773 avg / violation
11% serious89% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 2
Inspection trigger · follow-up
1 of 2

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 9 distinct standards shown · 9 citations in this view · $6,960 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0134 F0211$3,000May 2022May 2022
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0811$1,710Nov 2020Nov 2020
29 CFR 1910.0134 C0111$1,350Nov 2020Nov 2020
29 CFR 1904.0029 B0111$900Nov 2020Nov 2020
29 CFR 1910.0134 K0411May 2022May 2022
29 CFR 1910.0134 F0111Nov 2020Nov 2020
29 CFR 1910.0134 G01 I A11Nov 2020Nov 2020
29 CFR 1910.0134 K0111Nov 2020Nov 2020
29 CFR 1910.0134 E0111Nov 2020Nov 2020

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

84th

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 4851 within NC. Peer group: 20 employers. This establishment has 9 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
89th
peer median: $281
Inspection frequency
84th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
11.5
vs industry
+6.8
TRIR
14.2
vs industry
+8.1

Reported for 1,133 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
6.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
4.7
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
14.2
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
4 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 4+ years. Most recent activity: 4 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
2
Back wages owed
$0
Employees affected
1

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 2 cases · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
May 2017 – May 2019Bus and Other Motor Vehicle Transit Systems0
Jul 2010 – Sep 2010Local Transit Systems1

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in NC — for TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC., not this location alone

Total cases
53
Unfair labor practice
50
Representation (union)
3

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC. locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 53 cases · 50 ULP · 3 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
10-CA-387807Unfair labor practiceMay 2026OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-387683Unfair labor practiceMay 2026OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-379152Unfair labor practiceJan 2026OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-375087Unfair labor practiceNov 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-375081Unfair labor practiceNov 2025Apr 2026ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-349130Unfair labor practiceAug 2024Dec 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-328877Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Jul 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-328751Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Apr 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-324114Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Apr 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-319032Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Aug 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-313802Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Apr 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-305999Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Mar 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-280685Unfair labor practiceJul 2021Aug 2021ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-272428Unfair labor practiceFeb 2021Feb 2021ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-266126Unfair labor practiceSep 2020Oct 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-259433Unfair labor practiceApr 2020Jul 2021ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-259252Unfair labor practiceApr 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-258135Unfair labor practiceMar 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-243218Unfair labor practiceJun 2019Jul 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-239093Unfair labor practiceApr 2019Aug 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-232137Unfair labor practiceDec 2018Jan 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-230946Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Dec 2019ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-228728Unfair labor practiceOct 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-222604Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-220990Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-219734Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Jun 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-219727Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-219720Unfair labor practiceMay 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-216266Unfair labor practiceMar 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-216252Unfair labor practiceMar 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-216245Unfair labor practiceMar 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-213900Unfair labor practiceJan 2018Feb 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-212926Unfair labor practiceJan 2018Mar 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-212489Unfair labor practiceJan 2018Feb 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-207870Unfair labor practiceOct 2017Nov 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-203259Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Feb 2018ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-185402Unfair labor practiceOct 2016Dec 2016ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-164704Unfair labor practiceNov 2015Dec 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-154585Unfair labor practiceJun 2015Aug 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RC-148774Representation electionMar 2015Apr 2015ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-116274Unfair labor practiceNov 2013May 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-114618Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Jun 2014ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-114173Unfair labor practiceSep 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-107440Unfair labor practiceJun 2013Aug 2013ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RC-103297Representation electionApr 2013Jun 2013ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
11-CA-079266Unfair labor practiceApr 2012May 2012ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
11-CA-022864Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Aug 2011ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
11-RC-006744Representation electionOct 2010Dec 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
11-CA-022585Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Apr 2010ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
11-CA-022086Unfair labor practiceSep 2008Nov 2008ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
11-CA-021604Unfair labor practiceJun 2007Jan 2009ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
11-CA-021525Unfair labor practiceApr 2007Jul 2007ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
11-CA-018450Unfair labor practiceSep 1999Jan 2000ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2022-02-25Follow-up2$3,000
2020-08-28Complaint71$3,960

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in bus and other motor vehicle transit systems within NC, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC. has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 9 violations and $6,960 in total penalties.
How does TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC. operates in the bus and other motor vehicle transit systems industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 6.1. TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 11.5 compared to an industry average of 4.7.