Skip to main content

Establishment profile

TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.

205 SPURLINE DRIVE, GADSDEN, AL, 35903
331314Secondary Smelting and Alloying of Aluminum
EIN 621169615

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
5
over 19 years
Violations
14
$18,049 in penalties
Penalties
$18,049
$1,289 avg
Accident investigations on record
2 hospitalizations · 1 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC. has accumulated 14 OSHA violations across 5 inspections over 19 years of recorded history, with $18,049 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 67th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 22 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 76th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 6 years ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and EPA environmental compliance records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
5
0.3 / yr · last 19 yrs
Violations
14
0.7 / yr
Penalties
$18,049
$1,289 avg / violation
50% serious50% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 5
Inspection trigger · referral
2 of 5

80% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 3 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 14 distinct standards shown · 14 citations in this view · $18,049 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
5A000111$5,818Sep 2017Sep 2017
29 CFR 1910.0146 C05 IC11$2,050Apr 2012Apr 2012
29 CFR 1910.0305 J01 I11$1,625Apr 2008Apr 2008
29 CFR 1910.0305 B03 II11$1,625Apr 2008Apr 2008
29 CFR 1910.0023 D0111$1,600Apr 2012Apr 2012
29 CFR 1910.0037 A0311$1,350Apr 2012Apr 2012
29 CFR 1910.0022 B0111$1,300Apr 2008Apr 2008
29 CFR 1910.0023 E0111$1,031Sep 2006Sep 2006
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0511$825Sep 2006Sep 2006
29 CFR 1910.0215 B0911$825Sep 2006Sep 2006
29 CFR 1910.0146 C05 IIC11Apr 2012Apr 2012
29 CFR 1910.0145 C02 I11Apr 2012Apr 2012
29 CFR 1910.0134 D01 I11Apr 2012Apr 2012
29 CFR 1910.0037 B0211Apr 2012Apr 2012

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

67th

Above average violations in NAICS 3313 within AL. Peer group: 22 employers. This establishment has 14 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
71st
peer median: $7,164
Inspection frequency
76th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
2.2
vs industry
+0.2
TRIR
4.5
vs industry
+1.6

Reported for 75 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.9
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.0
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
4.5
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Complaint
2
Referral
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Sep 2017 – Oct 2022 · 1 in last 5 years

Reports
3
Hospitalizations
3
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Contact with hot objects or substances

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Oct 11, 2022Contact with hot objects or substancesNonclassifiableHospitalized
Nov 18, 2019Contact with hot objects or substancesFoot (feet), unspecifiedHospitalized
Sep 3, 2017Contact with hot objects or substancesMultiple lower extremities locations, n.e.c.Hospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Nov 18, 2019Aluminum Processing,Burn,Flying Object,Foot,Foundry,High Temperature,Metal,Molten Metal,PPE,Protective Clothing,Skin,Struck By11
Sep 3, 2017Burn,Foot,Furnace,Tripped11

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
6 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 6+ years. Most recent activity: 6 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

EPA inspections
6
Quarters non-compliant
0

EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS INC
205 SPURLINE DR · GADSDEN, AL, 35903
AirWaterRCRATRINo Violation Identified60Sep 2025View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2019-11-25Referral0$0
2017-09-07Referral11$5,818
2012-02-17Complaint73$5,000
2008-03-11Complaint3$4,550
2006-08-10Planned33$2,681

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in secondary smelting and alloying of aluminum within AL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC. has 5 OSHA inspections on record with 14 violations and $18,048.7 in total penalties.
How does TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC. operates in the secondary smelting and alloying of aluminum industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.9. TENNESSEE ALUMINUM PROCESSORS, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 2.24 compared to an industry average of 2.