Skip to main content

Establishment profile

TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.

31911 NE HWY 169, GREELEY, KS, 66033
Operated by Taylor Forge Engineered Systems Inc · 1 of 2 establishments
331210Iron and Steel Pipe and Tube Manufacturing from Purchased Steel

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
9
over 25 years
Violations
15
$11,491 in penalties
Penalties
$11,491
$766 avg
Accident investigations on record
7 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC. has accumulated 15 OSHA violations across 9 inspections over 25 years of recorded history, with $11,491 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 73rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 16 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 80th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 2 years ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
9
0.4 / yr · last 25 yrs
Violations
15
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$11,491
$766 avg / violation
7% serious93% other
Inspection trigger · planned
8 of 9
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 9

44% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 15 distinct standards shown · 15 citations in this view · $11,491 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0111$5,266May 2021May 2021
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$1,100Jan 2003Jan 2003
29 CFR 1910.0215 B0911$900Mar 2007Mar 2007
29 CFR 1910.0151 C11$800Apr 2007Apr 2007
29 CFR 1910.0134 F0211$800Apr 2007Apr 2007
29 CFR 1910.0252 B02 III11$800Apr 2007Apr 2007
29 CFR 1910.0107 E0211$800Apr 2007Apr 2007
29 CFR 1910.0184 I0111$575Mar 2007Mar 2007
29 CFR 1910.0303 F11$450Mar 2007Mar 2007
29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I11Apr 2007Apr 2007
29 CFR 1910.1200 F01 II11Apr 2007Apr 2007
29 CFR 1910.0157 C0111Mar 2007Mar 2007
29 CFR 1910.0037 Q0111Mar 2007Mar 2007
29 CFR 1910.0157 E0311Mar 2007Mar 2007
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I11Jan 2003Jan 2003

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

73rd

Above average violations in NAICS 3312 within KS. Peer group: 16 employers. This establishment has 15 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
67th
peer median: $3,395
Inspection frequency
80th
peer median: 3

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−1.6
TRIR
0.0
vs industry
−2.8

Reported for 225 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.8
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.6
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
8
Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
2 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 2+ years. Most recent activity: 2 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility · 1 marked inactive.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS INC
31911 NE HWY 169 · GREELEY, KS, 66033
00View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)

DOT number
279188
Operation
A

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2023-10-23Complaint0$0
2023-10-11Planned0$0
2021-02-10Planned1$5,266
2012-04-19Planned0$0
2007-03-08Planned6$1,925
2007-03-07Planned6$3,200
2005-05-10Planned0$0
2002-12-09Planned21$1,100
2001-03-21Planned0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC. is one of 2 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Taylor Forge Engineered Systems Inc.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Taylor Forge Engineered Systems Inc across all 2 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in iron and steel pipe and tube manufacturing from purchased steel within KS, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Taylor Forge Engineered Systems Inc, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Taylor Forge Engineered Systems Inc, which operates 2 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC. has 9 OSHA inspections on record with 15 violations and $11,491 in total penalties.
How does TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC. operates in the iron and steel pipe and tube manufacturing from purchased steel industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.8. TAYLOR FORGE ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.6.