Establishment profile
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
1 MEDICAL PLAZA DR., ROSEVILLE, CA, 95661
622110 — General Medical and Surgical Hospitals
EIN 942494000
Summary
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER has accumulated 23 OSHA violations across 28 inspections over 30 years of recorded history, with $43,630 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 98th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 1,052 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 28 days ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
29% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 3 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 22 citations in this view · $43,455 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5217 H01 A | 2 | 2 | $4,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 P02 A | 2 | 2 | $1,500 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5162 D | 1 | 1 | $5,625 | Sep 1999 | Sep 1999 |
| 342(A) | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Jan 2026 | Jan 2026 |
| 342 A | 1 | 1 | $3,000 | Sep 2007 | Sep 2007 |
| 5217 H02 D | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 H02 A | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 I02 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 L05 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 M03 A | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 N03 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 G01 D | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 J03 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 J02 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 N01 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 3203(A) | 1 | 1 | $1,200 | Jul 2025 | Jul 2025 |
| 5217 M05 | 1 | 1 | $1,125 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 5217 K | 1 | 1 | $1,125 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
| 3203(A)(7)(F) | 1 | 1 | $600 | Dec 2023 | Dec 2023 |
| 5194 G08 | 1 | 1 | $280 | Oct 1996 | Oct 1996 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 6221 within CA. Peer group: 1,052 employers. This establishment has 23 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 104 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2011 | HEALTH CARE WORKER,HEALTH CARE FACILITY,BACK,SPRAIN | 1 | 1 | — | |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FRACTURE,LACERATION,TRIPPED,FALL,FACE,VERTEBRA | 1 | 1 | — | |
| Apr 13, 2007 | JANITOR,LUNG,ALLERGIC REACTION,COLLAPSE,CLEANING,INHALATION,DISINFECTANT,CHEMICAL VAPOR | 1 | 1 | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 28 days ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in CA — for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 39 cases · 38 ULP · 1 representation
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-CA-367673 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2025 | Aug 2025 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-363520 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2025 | — | Open | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-363353 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2025 | Mar 2026 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-362734 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2025 | — | Open | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-361569 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2025 | May 2025 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-337913 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2024 | Jul 2024 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-336967 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2024 | Sep 2025 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-336778 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2024 | Sep 2025 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-336511 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2024 | Jul 2024 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-322994 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2023 | Apr 2024 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-320132 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2023 | Jul 2023 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-319875 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2023 | Apr 2024 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-319869 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2023 | Apr 2024 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-319231 | Unfair labor practice | May 2023 | Sep 2025 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-300349 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2022 | — | Open | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-276893 | Unfair labor practice | May 2021 | Jun 2021 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-276435 | Unfair labor practice | Apr 2021 | Sep 2025 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-273256 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2021 | Dec 2021 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-086001 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2012 | Apr 2014 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-085511 | Unfair labor practice | Jul 2012 | Apr 2014 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-035461 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2011 | Oct 2011 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-035460 | Unfair labor practice | Mar 2011 | Aug 2011 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-035354 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2010 | Sep 2011 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-035306 | Unfair labor practice | Oct 2010 | Dec 2010 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034869 | Unfair labor practice | Jan 2010 | Feb 2010 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034853 | Unfair labor practice | Jan 2010 | May 2011 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034645 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 2009 | Oct 2009 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034626 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2009 | Sep 2010 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034558 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2009 | Aug 2009 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034557 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2009 | Nov 2012 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034556 | Unfair labor practice | Jun 2009 | Oct 2009 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034521 | Unfair labor practice | May 2009 | Jul 2009 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034509 | Unfair labor practice | May 2009 | Jul 2009 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-RD-002475 | Representation election | May 2009 | Apr 2010 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-034157 | Unfair labor practice | Oct 2008 | Nov 2008 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-032354 | Unfair labor practice | Feb 2005 | Mar 2006 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-032250 | Unfair labor practice | Dec 2004 | Jan 2005 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-030946 | Unfair labor practice | Nov 2002 | Jun 2007 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
| 20-CA-028689 | Unfair labor practice | Sep 1998 | Jun 2000 | Closed | Region 20, San Francisco, California |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2026-05-21 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2026-01-21 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2025-10-27 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2025-10-03 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2025-08-27 | Accident | 1 | — | $5,000 | |
| 2025-02-19 | Accident | 1 | — | $1,200 | |
| 2023-08-18 | Complaint | 1 | — | $600 | |
| 2016-09-07 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2016-08-01 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2016-03-24 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2011-10-27 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2009-08-06 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2007-05-03 | Accident | 1 | — | $3,000 | |
| 2004-03-25 | Unprogrammed Related | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2004-03-17 | Unprogrammed Related | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-01-04 | Complaint | 1 | — | $175 | |
| 2000-06-28 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1999-10-08 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1999-04-02 | Complaint | 1 | 1 | $5,625 | |
| 1998-01-05 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1997-09-29 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1997-03-26 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1997-02-06 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1996-10-10 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1996-06-26 | Complaint | 8 | 7 | $14,750 | |
| 1996-05-08 | Complaint | 9 | 5 | $13,280 | |
| 1995-09-11 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in general medical and surgical hospitals within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITALRIVERSIDE — 4 federal enforcement records
- EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTERRANCHO MIRAGE — 4 federal enforcement records
- KAISER PERMANENTERICHMOND — 4 federal enforcement records
- KAISER PERMANENTEHAYWARD — 3 federal enforcement records
- KAISER PERMANENTEWOODLAND HILLS — 3 federal enforcement records
- RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITALMARYSVILLE — 3 federal enforcement records
- HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HOSPITALVALENCIA — 3 federal enforcement records
- BARSTOW COMMUNITY HOSPITALBARSTOW — 3 federal enforcement records
- KAISER PERMANENTEPANORAMA CITY — 3 federal enforcement records
- CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCOSAN FRANCISCO — 3 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- General Medical and Surgical HospitalsAll employers in this industry
- Employers in CAState-wide enforcement data
- General Medical and in CAIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER's OSHA violation history?
- SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER has 28 OSHA inspections on record with 23 violations and $43,630 in total penalties.
- How does SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER's safety record compare to its industry?
- SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER operates in the general medical and surgical hospitals industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 5.1. SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 2.1.