Establishment profile
SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.
1600 W. MCKAY STREET, FRONTENAC, KS, 66763
Operated by Sugar Creek Packing Co · 1 of 2 establishments
311612 — Meat Processed from Carcasses
Summary
SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. has accumulated 44 OSHA violations across 13 inspections over 34 years of recorded history, with $52,227 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 93rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 88 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 91st percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 4 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. appears in OSHA workplace safety and WHD wage enforcement records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
62% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 3 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 23 citations in this view · $49,790 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 3 | 3 | $1,563 | May 1992 | Jun 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 2 | 2 | $750 | Oct 1998 | Jun 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0119 J03 | 1 | 1 | $4,900 | Jul 2012 | Jul 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0119 F01 IV | 1 | 1 | $4,900 | Jul 2012 | Jul 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0119 G01 I | 1 | 1 | $4,900 | Jul 2012 | Jul 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0119 F01 | 1 | 1 | $4,900 | Jul 2012 | Jul 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0119 E05 | 1 | 1 | $4,900 | Jul 2012 | Jul 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0036 G02 | 1 | 1 | $4,900 | Feb 2012 | Feb 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0119 J02 | 1 | 1 | $4,000 | Jul 2003 | Jul 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 F06 | 1 | 1 | $3,802 | Apr 2017 | Apr 2017 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 A06 | 1 | 1 | $1,650 | Dec 2014 | Dec 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0037 F06 | 1 | 1 | $1,313 | May 1992 | May 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II | 1 | 1 | $1,313 | May 1992 | May 1992 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 G01 I | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Jun 2003 | Jun 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B02 | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Jun 2003 | Jun 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0146 G01 | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Jun 2003 | Jun 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A02 | 1 | 1 | $750 | Jun 2003 | Jun 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 F03 | 1 | 1 | $750 | Jun 2003 | Jun 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q01 | 1 | 1 | $750 | Jun 2003 | Jun 2003 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0243 B02 | 1 | 1 | $750 | Jun 2003 | Jun 2003 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3116 within KS. Peer group: 88 employers. This establishment has 44 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 695 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jun 2017 – Sep 2024 · 2 in last 5 years
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2024 | Struck by running powered equipment during maintenance, cleaning, testing | Arm(s) unspecified | Hospitalized | |
| Jun 20, 2022 | Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment | Finger(s), fingernail(s), unspecified | Amputation | |
| Jun 1, 2017 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning | Fingertip(s) | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2017 | Amputation,Caught By,Caught In,Finger | 1 | — | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 4+ years. Most recent activity: 4 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 74 violations · $28,013 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLSA — minimum wage & overtime | Mar 2017 | 1 | 74 | 73 | $28,013 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 2 cases · 74 violations · $28,013 in backwages · 74 workers affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2015 – Mar 2017 | Meat Processed from Carcasses | FLSA | 74 | 73 | $28,013 | — |
| Jan 2008 – Apr 2008 | Rendering and Meat Byproduct Processing | — | — | 1 | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUGAR CREEK PACKING COMPANY 1600 W MCKAY · FRONTENAC, KS, 66763 | AirWaterRCRATRI | No Violation Identified | 0 | 0 | — | Jun 1998 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-23 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2021-04-13 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2017-06-07 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2017-01-24 | Complaint | 1 | — | $3,802 | |
| 2017-01-24 | Complaint | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2014-12-03 | Planned | 1 | — | $1,650 | |
| 2012-01-30 | Planned | 5 | 5 | $24,500 | |
| 2012-01-23 | Planned | 2 | — | $4,900 | |
| 2012-01-18 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2008-03-27 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2003-01-15 | Planned | 19 | 10 | $12,500 | |
| 1998-09-11 | Planned | 3 | — | $0 | |
| 1992-05-12 | Complaint | 12 | 8 | $4,875 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. is one of 2 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Sugar Creek Packing Co.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Sugar Creek Packing Co across all 2 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in meat processed from carcasses within KS, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- DOLD FOODS LLCWICHITA — 3 federal enforcement records
- ELKHORN VALLEY PACKINGHARPER — 2 federal enforcement records
- TYSON FRESH MEATS, INC.EMPORIA — 2 federal enforcement records
- TYSON FOODS INC.HOLCOMB — 2 federal enforcement records
- CARGILL, INC.DODGE CITY — 2 federal enforcement records
- GREAT BEND PACKING CO., INC.GREAT BEND — 2 federal enforcement records
- TYSON FOODS INC.HUTCHINSON — 2 federal enforcement records
- TYSON FOODS, INC.SOUTH HUTCHINSON — 2 federal enforcement records
- BEEF PRODUCTS INC.HOLCOMB — 2 federal enforcement records
- NATIONAL BEEF PACKING CO LLCLIBERAL — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All Sugar Creek Packing Co locationsParent rollup
- Meat Processed from CarcassesAll employers in this industry
- Employers in KSState-wide enforcement data
- Meat Processed from in KSIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Sugar Creek Packing Co, which operates 2 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.'s OSHA violation history?
- SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. has 13 OSHA inspections on record with 44 violations and $52,227.4 in total penalties.
- How does SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. operates in the meat processed from carcasses industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.7. SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.'s self-reported DART rate is 2.09 compared to an industry average of 2.7.