Skip to main content

Establishment profile

STARBUCKS CORPORATION

1330 HARBOR CITY BLVD, WEST MELBOURNE, FL, 32904
Operated by Starbucks Corporation · 1 of 259 establishments
722513Limited-Service Restaurants

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 1 year
Violations
1
$2,553 in penalties
Penalties
$2,553
$2,553 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

STARBUCKS CORPORATION has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 1 year of recorded history, with $2,553 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 69th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 307 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

STARBUCKS CORPORATION appears in OSHA workplace safety, NLRB labor relations, and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
1.0 / yr · last 1 yrs
Violations
1
1.0 / yr
Penalties
$2,553
$2,553 avg / violation

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $2,553 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0303 G0111$2,553Jun 2025Jun 2025

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

69th

Above average violations in NAICS 7225 within FL. Peer group: 307 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 0.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
84th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.6
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.0
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
1 year ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in FL — for Starbucks Corporation, not this location alone

Total cases
49
Unfair labor practice
21
Representation (union)
28

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Starbucks Corporation locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 49 cases · 21 ULP · 28 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
15-RC-389145Representation electionJun 2026OpenRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
12-CA-375786Unfair labor practiceNov 2025OpenRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-373748Unfair labor practiceSep 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-373678Unfair labor practiceSep 2025OpenRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-372966Representation electionSep 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-365598Representation electionMay 2025Jun 2025ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-361465Unfair labor practiceMar 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-359473Representation electionJan 2025Mar 2025ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-358818Representation electionJan 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-358230Unfair labor practiceJan 2025OpenRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-349665Representation electionSep 2024Oct 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-347743Representation electionAug 2024Sep 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-343663Representation electionJun 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-341312Representation electionMay 2024May 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RM-335806Representation electionFeb 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-334823Representation electionJan 2024Mar 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-334148Unfair labor practiceJan 2024Jul 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RD-332171Representation electionDec 2023Aug 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-330151Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Dec 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-321537Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Feb 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-321037Unfair labor practiceJun 2023OpenRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RD-320278Representation electionJun 2023Mar 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-318968Representation electionMay 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-319417Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Feb 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-316922Representation electionApr 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-313479Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-309776Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-309754Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Feb 2023ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-309172Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Feb 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-308905Unfair labor practiceDec 2022OpenRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-308848Unfair labor practiceDec 2022OpenRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-307896Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Dec 2025ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-306451Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-297802Representation electionJun 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-295949Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-295000Representation electionMay 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-292836Representation electionMar 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-292669Representation electionMar 2022Mar 2023ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-292619Unfair labor practiceMar 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-292377Representation electionMar 2022Mar 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-292183Representation electionMar 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-291975Representation electionMar 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-291207Representation electionFeb 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-CA-291151Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Jul 2024ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-291023Representation electionFeb 2022Mar 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-290746Representation electionFeb 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-290711Representation electionFeb 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-290700Representation electionFeb 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida
12-RC-288866Representation electionJan 2022May 2022ClosedRegion 12, Tampa, Florida

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility · 1 marked inactive.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
STARBUCKS
1425 W NEW HAVEN AVE · MELBOURNE, FL, 32904
Water00View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for STARBUCKS CORPORATION. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

CPSC product recalls

Total recalls
3
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units recalled
0

Top hazard: The stainless steel straws are rigid and can poke children in the mouth, posing a risk of injury.. Most recent recall: 2019-05-01. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.

CPSC recall roster

Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 3 recalls shown · 3 distinct hazard categories.

RecallDateHazardsUnitsCPSC
Starbucks Recalls Bodum Recycled Coffee Presses Due to Laceration Hazard
#19114
May 2019The coffee press' plunger knob can break and expose the metal rod, posing a laceration hazard.View →
Teavana Recalls Flip Tumblers Due to Burn Hazard
#17128
Apr 2017The flip tumblers can leak hot liquid, posing a burn hazard.View →
Laceration Injuries to Children Prompt Starbucks to Recall Stainless Steel Beverage Straws to Provide New Warnings
#16236
Aug 2016The stainless steel straws are rigid and can poke children in the mouth, posing a risk of injury.View →

Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-04-21Monitoring1$2,553

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

STARBUCKS CORPORATION is one of 259 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Starbucks Corporation.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Starbucks Corporation across all 259 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in limited-service restaurants within FL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Starbucks Corporation, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on STARBUCKS CORPORATION from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Starbucks Corporation, which operates 259 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is STARBUCKS CORPORATION's OSHA violation history?
STARBUCKS CORPORATION has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $2,553.3 in total penalties.
How does STARBUCKS CORPORATION's safety record compare to its industry?
STARBUCKS CORPORATION operates in the limited-service restaurants industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.6.