Starbucks

No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for Starbucks. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for Starbucks. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for Starbucks. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 3 violations · $1,121 in backwages

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 3 violations · $1,121 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for Starbucks. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Company-level in FL — for Starbucks Corporation, not this location alone

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Starbucks Corporation locations in the same state.

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 49 cases · 21 ULP · 28 representation

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for Starbucks. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for Starbucks. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for Starbucks. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Top hazard: The stainless steel straws are rigid and can poke children in the mouth, posing a risk of injury.. Most recent recall: 2019-05-01. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.

Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 3 recalls shown · 3 distinct hazard categories.

Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.