Skip to main content

Establishment profile

Starbucks

4220 Harding Rd., Nashville, TN, 37205
Operated by Starbucks Corporation · 1 of 261 establishments

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
0
over 20 years
Violations
0
Penalties
$0
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Context
No OSHA inspections on record. This does not mean the employer is violation-free — OSHA inspects a small fraction of workplaces annually.

Summary

Starbucks has no OSHA inspection history on file. Federal records covering wage, environmental, labor relations, and other agencies are noted below where present.

The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 20 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

Starbucks appears in WHD wage enforcement, NLRB labor relations, and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in OSHA workplace safety, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for Starbucks. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for Starbucks. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for Starbucks. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
20 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 20+ years. Most recent activity: 20 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Jan 2004 – Jan 2006Local Hospitals0

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for Starbucks. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in TN — for Starbucks Corporation, not this location alone

Total cases
40
Unfair labor practice
28
Representation (union)
12

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Starbucks Corporation locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 40 cases · 28 ULP · 12 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
10-CA-393921Unfair labor practiceAug 2026OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RC-384497Representation electionApr 2026May 2026ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RC-382632Representation electionMar 2026Apr 2026ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RC-370845Representation electionAug 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RC-349904Representation electionSep 2024Oct 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RD-339520Representation electionApr 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-336603Unfair labor practiceFeb 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-334807Unfair labor practiceJan 2024Nov 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-322617Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Aug 2024ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-321864Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Feb 2026ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-RC-312421Representation electionFeb 2023Apr 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-309684Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-308261Unfair labor practiceDec 2022OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-307317Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Aug 2025ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-306754Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Feb 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-305997Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Aug 2024ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-305620Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Feb 2026ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-305518Unfair labor practiceOct 2022May 2023ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-304674Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Apr 2025ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-304520Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Aug 2024ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-302805Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-300497Unfair labor practiceAug 2022OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-294915Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-294687Unfair labor practiceApr 2022OpenRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-RC-294680Representation electionApr 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RC-294624Representation electionApr 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-294482Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-294365Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-293868Unfair labor practiceApr 2022OpenRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-RC-292155Representation electionMar 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-RC-292148Representation electionMar 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-292154Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Mar 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
10-CA-291956Unfair labor practiceMar 2022OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-291952Unfair labor practiceMar 2022OpenRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-CA-291616Unfair labor practiceMar 2022OpenRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia
15-CA-291211Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Apr 2022ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-290337Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022OpenRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-CA-290336Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022OpenRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
15-RC-289150Representation electionJan 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 15, New Orleans, Louisiana
10-RC-288098Representation electionDec 2021Apr 2022ClosedRegion 10, Atlanta, Georgia

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for Starbucks. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for Starbucks. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

CPSC product recalls

Total recalls
3
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units recalled
0

Top hazard: The flip tumblers can leak hot liquid, posing a burn hazard.. Most recent recall: 2019-05-01. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.

CPSC recall roster

Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 3 recalls shown · 3 distinct hazard categories.

RecallDateHazardsUnitsCPSC
Starbucks Recalls Bodum Recycled Coffee Presses Due to Laceration Hazard
#19114
May 2019The coffee press' plunger knob can break and expose the metal rod, posing a laceration hazard.View →
Teavana Recalls Flip Tumblers Due to Burn Hazard
#17128
Apr 2017The flip tumblers can leak hot liquid, posing a burn hazard.View →
Laceration Injuries to Children Prompt Starbucks to Recall Stainless Steel Beverage Straws to Provide New Warnings
#16236
Aug 2016The stainless steel straws are rigid and can poke children in the mouth, posing a risk of injury.View →

Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

Starbucks is one of 261 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Starbucks Corporation.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Starbucks Corporation across all 261 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in this industry within TN, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Starbucks Corporation, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on Starbucks from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Starbucks Corporation, which operates 261 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is Starbucks's OSHA violation history?
Starbucks has no OSHA inspections on record.