Skip to main content

Establishment profile

STARBUCKS

CO

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
0
Violations
0
Penalties
$0
Context
No OSHA inspections on record. This does not mean the employer is violation-free — OSHA inspects a small fraction of workplaces annually.

Summary

STARBUCKS has no OSHA inspection history on file. Federal records covering wage, environmental, labor relations, and other agencies are noted below where present.

The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 0 days ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

STARBUCKS appears in NLRB labor relations and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
0 days ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 0 days ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CO — for STARBUCKS, not this location alone

Total cases
69
Unfair labor practice
35
Representation (union)
34

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other STARBUCKS locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 69 cases · 35 ULP · 34 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
27-RD-390667Representation electionJul 2026OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-389799Unfair labor practiceJun 2026OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-386701Representation electionMay 2026OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-383963Unfair labor practiceMar 2026Apr 2026ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-381644Representation electionFeb 2026Apr 2026ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-379580Representation electionJan 2026Mar 2026ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-377872Unfair labor practiceDec 2025OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-368202Representation electionJun 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-366670Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-366513Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-362925Representation electionMar 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-362916Representation electionMar 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-361160Representation electionFeb 2025Apr 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-358381Unfair labor practiceJan 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-358375Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-357986Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-357179Representation electionDec 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-351605Representation electionSep 2024Oct 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-347675Representation electionAug 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-341548Representation electionMay 2024May 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-341532Representation electionMay 2024May 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RM-337203Representation electionMar 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RM-337192Representation electionMar 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-336351Representation electionFeb 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-336299Representation electionFeb 2024Apr 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-330639Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Sep 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-329627Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Sep 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-324171Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Mar 2026ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-322996Representation electionAug 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-322678Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RD-321383Representation electionJul 2023OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-319024Representation electionMay 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-315835Unfair labor practiceApr 2023OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-314597Representation electionMar 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-309163Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Dec 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-309162Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jun 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-307847Unfair labor practiceNov 2022Dec 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-307542Unfair labor practiceNov 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-307323Representation electionNov 2022Feb 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-306643Unfair labor practiceNov 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-305876Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Aug 2024ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-302626Representation electionSep 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-300862Representation electionAug 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-300044Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-298017Unfair labor practiceJun 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-297804Unfair labor practiceJun 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-297073Unfair labor practiceJun 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-296772Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-296692Unfair labor practiceMay 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-296209Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jan 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-296100Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-296058Unfair labor practiceMay 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-295675Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-295554Unfair labor practiceMay 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-294954Unfair labor practiceApr 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-294617Unfair labor practiceApr 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-294536Unfair labor practiceApr 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-293880Representation electionApr 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-293572Representation electionApr 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-292681Representation electionMar 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-292570Unfair labor practiceMar 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-292261Representation electionMar 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-292041Representation electionMar 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-292032Representation electionMar 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-291466Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-291118Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-290551Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-289608Representation electionJan 2022Jan 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-288318Representation electionDec 2021May 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

CPSC product recalls

Total recalls
3
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units recalled
0

Top hazard: The coffee press' plunger knob can break and expose the metal rod, posing a laceration hazard.. Most recent recall: 2019-05-01. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.

CPSC recall roster

Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 3 recalls shown · 3 distinct hazard categories.

RecallDateHazardsUnitsCPSC
Starbucks Recalls Bodum Recycled Coffee Presses Due to Laceration Hazard
#19114
May 2019The coffee press' plunger knob can break and expose the metal rod, posing a laceration hazard.View →
Teavana Recalls Flip Tumblers Due to Burn Hazard
#17128
Apr 2017The flip tumblers can leak hot liquid, posing a burn hazard.View →
Laceration Injuries to Children Prompt Starbucks to Recall Stainless Steel Beverage Straws to Provide New Warnings
#16236
Aug 2016The stainless steel straws are rigid and can poke children in the mouth, posing a risk of injury.View →

Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.

In the news

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on STARBUCKS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is STARBUCKS's OSHA violation history?
STARBUCKS has no OSHA inspections on record.