Skip to main content

Establishment profile

STARBUCKS

MO

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
0
Violations
0
Penalties
$0
Context
No OSHA inspections on record. This does not mean the employer is violation-free — OSHA inspects a small fraction of workplaces annually.

Summary

STARBUCKS has no OSHA inspection history on file. Federal records covering wage, environmental, labor relations, and other agencies are noted below where present.

The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 0 days ago.

Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

STARBUCKS appears in NLRB labor relations and CPSC product recalls records only. No matching records were found in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

No OSHA inspections, citations, or accidents on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
0 days ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 0 days ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in MO — for STARBUCKS, not this location alone

Total cases
68
Unfair labor practice
41
Representation (union)
27

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other STARBUCKS locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 68 cases · 41 ULP · 27 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
14-CA-387114Unfair labor practiceMay 2026May 2026ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-382634Representation electionMar 2026Apr 2026ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-379592Unfair labor practiceJan 2026OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-378509Unfair labor practiceJan 2026OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-377857Representation electionDec 2025Feb 2026ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-377451Unfair labor practiceDec 2025OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-375205Unfair labor practiceNov 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-373727Representation electionSep 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-372422Unfair labor practiceAug 2025OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-372197Unfair labor practiceAug 2025Apr 2026ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-371366Unfair labor practiceAug 2025OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-371365Unfair labor practiceAug 2025OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-371364Unfair labor practiceAug 2025OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-371312Unfair labor practiceAug 2025OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-370356Representation electionJul 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-368055Unfair labor practiceJun 2025OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-367756Representation electionJun 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-366647Representation electionMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-364478Representation electionApr 2025Jun 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-359403Representation electionJan 2025Mar 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-354283Representation electionNov 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-335014Unfair labor practiceFeb 2024Aug 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-334485Unfair labor practiceJan 2024Jul 2026ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RM-332374Representation electionDec 2023Sep 2024ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-331483Representation electionDec 2023Sep 2024ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-331116Unfair labor practiceDec 2023Aug 2025ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-330238Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-321382Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Jun 2026ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-320758Representation electionJun 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-320308Representation electionJun 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-315026Representation electionMar 2023May 2023ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-312412Unfair labor practiceFeb 2023OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-306625Unfair labor practiceNov 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-305924Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Aug 2024ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-305711Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Dec 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-305307Unfair labor practiceOct 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-304821Unfair labor practiceOct 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-301765Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-301096Unfair labor practiceAug 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-301094Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-300891Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-300149Unfair labor practiceJul 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-298575Representation electionJun 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-298038Unfair labor practiceJun 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-297893Representation electionJun 2022Nov 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-297892Representation electionJun 2022Sep 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-296843Unfair labor practiceJun 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-296784Representation electionMay 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-296355Unfair labor practiceMay 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-296252Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-295815Unfair labor practiceMay 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-295813Unfair labor practiceMay 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-295806Unfair labor practiceMay 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-295786Unfair labor practiceMay 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-295373Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-295038Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-294493Representation electionApr 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-293917Representation electionApr 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-293845Unfair labor practiceApr 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-293479Representation electionApr 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-293441Representation electionApr 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-293357Representation electionApr 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-293254Representation electionMar 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-292753Representation electionMar 2022Dec 2023ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-292066Representation electionMar 2022Jun 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-291388Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-291278Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022OpenRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-RC-289930Representation electionFeb 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for STARBUCKS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

CPSC product recalls

Total recalls
3
Last 5 years
0
Last 12 months
0
Units recalled
0

Top hazard: The coffee press' plunger knob can break and expose the metal rod, posing a laceration hazard.. Most recent recall: 2019-05-01. Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, matched on company name.

CPSC recall roster

Every CPSC consumer-product recall associated with this manufacturer, most-recent first. Hazards reflect CPSC’s classification (laceration, fire, fall, choking, lead exposure, etc.). Each row links to the agency’s authoritative recall page for the full remedy / contact / recall-number detail. 3 recalls shown · 3 distinct hazard categories.

RecallDateHazardsUnitsCPSC
Starbucks Recalls Bodum Recycled Coffee Presses Due to Laceration Hazard
#19114
May 2019The coffee press' plunger knob can break and expose the metal rod, posing a laceration hazard.View →
Teavana Recalls Flip Tumblers Due to Burn Hazard
#17128
Apr 2017The flip tumblers can leak hot liquid, posing a burn hazard.View →
Laceration Injuries to Children Prompt Starbucks to Recall Stainless Steel Beverage Straws to Provide New Warnings
#16236
Aug 2016The stainless steel straws are rigid and can poke children in the mouth, posing a risk of injury.View →

Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall details (specific products, sale dates, remedy instructions) live on the cpsc.gov record linked from each row.

In the news

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on STARBUCKS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is STARBUCKS's OSHA violation history?
STARBUCKS has no OSHA inspections on record.