Establishment profile
ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.
4900 S. MAJOR AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL, 60638
Operated by OSI Group · 1 of 6 establishments
311612 — Meat Processed from Carcasses
EIN 522399959
Summary
ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. has accumulated 66 OSHA violations across 18 inspections over 53 years of recorded history, with $30,675 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 180 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 99th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 2 years ago.
Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
56% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 30 citations in this view · $30,595 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 3 | 3 | $155 | Sep 1972 | May 1982 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 3 | 3 | — | Aug 1975 | Aug 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I | 2 | 2 | $11,000 | Oct 2013 | May 2023 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 D01 | 2 | 2 | $90 | May 1982 | Feb 1983 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 2 | 2 | $30 | Sep 1972 | Aug 1975 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0178 P01 | 2 | 2 | — | Apr 1982 | Aug 2005 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 A04 | 2 | 2 | — | Sep 1972 | Aug 1975 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 A01 | 2 | 2 | — | Sep 1972 | Aug 1975 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 D | 1 | 1 | $9,375 | May 2023 | May 2023 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 D02 | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | Jul 2018 | Jul 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 IV A | 1 | 1 | $3,000 | Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 A05 | 1 | 1 | $1,500 | Jun 1994 | Jun 1994 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 A | 1 | 1 | $90 | May 1982 | May 1982 |
| 29 CFR 1960.1000 | 1 | 1 | $90 | Sep 1972 | Sep 1972 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 1 | 1 | $75 | Sep 1972 | Sep 1972 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0309 A 037905 | 1 | 1 | $50 | Aug 1975 | Aug 1975 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A04 | 1 | 1 | $35 | Aug 1975 | Aug 1975 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0309 A 040005 | 1 | 1 | $35 | Aug 1975 | Aug 1975 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0309 A 025045 | 1 | 1 | $35 | Aug 1975 | Aug 1975 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 A02 | 1 | 1 | $35 | Aug 1975 | Aug 1975 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3116 within IL. Peer group: 180 employers. This establishment has 66 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 623 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Mar 2017 – Apr 2023 · 1 in last 5 years
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2023 | Caught in running equipment or machinery, unspecified | Finger(s), fingernail(s), unspecified | Amputation | |
| Jun 7, 2020 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning | Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c. | Amputation | |
| Mar 3, 2020 | Overexertion involving outside sources, unspecified | Back, including spine, spinal cord, unspecified | Hospitalized | |
| Apr 11, 2018 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning | Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c. | Amputation | |
| Mar 18, 2017 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning | Finger(s), fingernail(s), unspecified | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2020 | Amputated,Amputation,Caught Between,Caught By,Caught In,Cleaning,Finger,Gear,Glove,Hand,Inexperience,Instantaneous amputation,Laborer,Lockout,Lockout/Tagout,Lubricating,Maintenance,Misjudgment,Misjudgment of Hazardous Situation,Packing House,Pulled In,Traumatic Amputation | 1 | — | — | |
| Apr 11, 2018 | Amputation,Chain,Conveyor Belt,Finger,Maintenance,Sprocket | 1 | — | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 2+ years. Most recent activity: 2 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2006 – Oct 2006 | Animal Slaughtering and Processing | — | — | 1 | — | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
Company-level in IL — for OSI Group, not this location alone
National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other OSI Group locations in the same state.
NLRB cases
National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 2 cases · 2 ULP
| Case number | Type | Filed | Closed | Status | Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13-CA-044239 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2007 | Sep 2007 | Closed | Region 13, Chicago, Illinois |
| 13-CA-040432 | Unfair labor practice | Aug 2002 | Jan 2003 | Closed | Region 13, Chicago, Illinois |
Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2023-04-06 | Referral | 2 | 1 | $19,375 | |
| 2020-06-11 | Referral | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2018-04-17 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | |
| 2013-06-26 | Planned | 2 | — | $4,000 | |
| 2008-10-07 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2006-11-20 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2005-07-08 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2005-05-05 | Planned | 2 | — | $0 | |
| 2005-05-05 | Planned | 6 | — | $0 | |
| 2004-03-03 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-06-27 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-03-27 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1994-06-07 | Planned | 2 | 1 | $1,500 | |
| 1983-01-28 | Planned | 4 | — | $0 | |
| 1982-04-08 | Planned | 16 | 4 | $320 | |
| 1975-07-08 | Planned | 18 | — | $225 | |
| 1972-08-21 | Complaint | 13 | — | $255 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. is one of 6 establishments rolled up under the parent organization OSI Group.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of OSI Group across all 6 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in meat processed from carcasses within IL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- MOMENCE PACKING CO.MOMENCE — 4 federal enforcement records
- PORTILLO'S FOOD SERVICE, INC.ADDISON — 3 federal enforcement records
- BOBAK SAUSAGE COMPANYCHICAGO — 2 federal enforcement records
- CHICAGO MEAT AUTHORITY, INC.CHICAGO — 2 federal enforcement records
- LAND O' FROST, INC.LANSING — 2 federal enforcement records
- DUTCH FARMS, INC.CHICAGO — 2 federal enforcement records
- RANDOLPH PACKING CO.STREAMWOOD — 2 federal enforcement records
- C & F PACKING COMPANY, INC.LAKE VILLA — 2 federal enforcement records
- LAND O'FROST, INC.LANSING — 2 federal enforcement records
- PARKER HOUSE SAUSAGE COMPANYCHICAGO — 2 federal enforcement records
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by OSI Group, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- OSI INDUSTRIES, LLCCHICAGO, IL — 4 federal enforcement records
- OSI GROUP, LLCWEST CHICAGO, IL — 2 federal enforcement records
- OSI GROUP, LLCGENEVA, IL — 2 federal enforcement records
- OSI Group LLCAURORA, IL — 1 federal enforcement record
- OSI GROUP, LLC ASHLANDCHICAGO, IL — 0 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- All OSI Group locationsParent rollup
- Meat Processed from CarcassesAll employers in this industry
- Employers in ILState-wide enforcement data
- Meat Processed from in ILIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup OSI Group, which operates 6 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. has 18 OSHA inspections on record with 66 violations and $30,675 in total penalties.
- How does ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. operates in the meat processed from carcasses industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.7. ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 3.04 compared to an industry average of 2.7.