Skip to main content

Establishment profile

ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.

4900 S. MAJOR AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL, 60638
Operated by OSI Group · 1 of 6 establishments
311612Meat Processed from Carcasses
EIN 522399959

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
18
over 53 years
Violations
66
$30,675 in penalties
Penalties
$30,675
$465 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
8 National Emphasis Program inspections · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. has accumulated 66 OSHA violations across 18 inspections over 53 years of recorded history, with $30,675 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 100th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 180 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 99th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 2 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
18
0.3 / yr · last 53 yrs
Violations
66
1.2 / yr
Penalties
$30,675
$465 avg / violation
11% serious89% other
Inspection trigger · planned
8 of 18
Inspection trigger · complaint
6 of 18

56% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 30 citations in this view · $30,595 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0133$155Sep 1972May 1982
29 CFR 1910.0215 B0933Aug 1975Aug 2005
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I22$11,000Oct 2013May 2023
29 CFR 1910.0219 D0122$90May 1982Feb 1983
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0122$30Sep 1972Aug 1975
29 CFR 1910.0178 P0122Apr 1982Aug 2005
29 CFR 1910.0215 A0422Sep 1972Aug 1975
29 CFR 1910.0022 A0122Sep 1972Aug 1975
29 CFR 1910.0147 D11$9,375May 2023May 2023
29 CFR 1910.0147 D0211$5,000Jul 2018Jul 2018
29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 IV A11$3,000Oct 2013Oct 2013
29 CFR 1910.0023 A0511$1,500Jun 1994Jun 1994
29 CFR 1910.0132 A11$90May 1982May 1982
29 CFR 1960.100011$90Sep 1972Sep 1972
29 CFR 1910.0151 C11$75Sep 1972Sep 1972
29 CFR 1910.0309 A 03790511$50Aug 1975Aug 1975
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0411$35Aug 1975Aug 1975
29 CFR 1910.0309 A 04000511$35Aug 1975Aug 1975
29 CFR 1910.0309 A 02504511$35Aug 1975Aug 1975
29 CFR 1910.0215 A0211$35Aug 1975Aug 1975

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

100th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3116 within IL. Peer group: 180 employers. This establishment has 66 OSHA violations; peer median is 4.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
86th
peer median: $6,363
Inspection frequency
99th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
3.0
vs industry
+0.3
TRIR
3.7
vs industry
0.0

Reported for 623 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.7
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.7
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
3.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
8
Complaint
6
Referral
3
Follow-up
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Mar 2017 – Apr 2023 · 1 in last 5 years

Reports
5
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
4
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Apr 3, 2023Caught in running equipment or machinery, unspecifiedFinger(s), fingernail(s), unspecifiedAmputation
Jun 7, 2020Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaningFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation
Mar 3, 2020Overexertion involving outside sources, unspecifiedBack, including spine, spinal cord, unspecifiedHospitalized
Apr 11, 2018Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaningFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation
Mar 18, 2017Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaningFinger(s), fingernail(s), unspecifiedAmputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Jun 7, 2020Amputated,Amputation,Caught Between,Caught By,Caught In,Cleaning,Finger,Gear,Glove,Hand,Inexperience,Instantaneous amputation,Laborer,Lockout,Lockout/Tagout,Lubricating,Maintenance,Misjudgment,Misjudgment of Hazardous Situation,Packing House,Pulled In,Traumatic Amputation1
Apr 11, 2018Amputation,Chain,Conveyor Belt,Finger,Maintenance,Sprocket1

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
2 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 2+ years. Most recent activity: 2 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0
Employees affected
1

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
May 2006 – Oct 2006Animal Slaughtering and Processing1

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in IL — for OSI Group, not this location alone

Total cases
2
Unfair labor practice
2

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other OSI Group locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 2 cases · 2 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
13-CA-044239Unfair labor practiceAug 2007Sep 2007ClosedRegion 13, Chicago, Illinois
13-CA-040432Unfair labor practiceAug 2002Jan 2003ClosedRegion 13, Chicago, Illinois

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2023-11-02Follow-up0$0
2023-04-06Referral21$19,375
2020-06-11Referral0$0
2018-04-17Referral11$5,000
2013-06-26Planned2$4,000
2008-10-07Complaint0$0
2006-11-20Complaint0$0
2005-07-08Planned0$0
2005-05-05Planned2$0
2005-05-05Planned6$0
2004-03-03Complaint0$0
2002-06-27Complaint0$0
2002-03-27Complaint0$0
1994-06-07Planned21$1,500
1983-01-28Planned4$0
1982-04-08Planned164$320
1975-07-08Planned18$225
1972-08-21Complaint13$255

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. is one of 6 establishments rolled up under the parent organization OSI Group.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of OSI Group across all 6 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in meat processed from carcasses within IL, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by OSI Group, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup OSI Group, which operates 6 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. has 18 OSHA inspections on record with 66 violations and $30,675 in total penalties.
How does ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC. operates in the meat processed from carcasses industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.7. ROSE PACKING COMPANY, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 3.04 compared to an industry average of 2.7.