Skip to main content

Establishment profile

RIVERBAY CORPORATION

100 DEKRUIS PL., BRONX, NY, 10475
531311Residential Property Managers

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
11
over 46 years
Violations
20
$17,290 in penalties
Penalties
$17,290
$865 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 fatality · 1 National Emphasis Program inspections · 2 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

RIVERBAY CORPORATION has accumulated 20 OSHA violations across 11 inspections over 46 years of recorded history, with $17,290 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 99th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 291 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

RIVERBAY CORPORATION appears in OSHA workplace safety, NLRB labor relations, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
11
0.2 / yr · last 46 yrs
Violations
20
0.4 / yr
Penalties
$17,290
$865 avg / violation
65% serious35% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
5 of 11
Inspection trigger · accident
2 of 11

45% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 3 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 20 citations in this view · $17,290 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0184 C0111$4,000May 2015May 2015
29 CFR 1910.0179 G0111$3,000May 2015May 2015
29 CFR 1904.0039 A0211$3,000May 2015May 2015
29 CFR 1910.0179 J02 III11$1,250Apr 1996Apr 1996
29 CFR 1926.0403 I02 I11$1,250Apr 1996Apr 1996
29 CFR 1910.0179 J02 VI11$1,250Apr 1996Apr 1996
29 CFR 1910.0132 A11$810Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0133 A0111$810Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.1200 G0811$640Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.1200 H11$640Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.1200 E0111$640Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0179 J0211May 2015May 2015
29 CFR 1910.0184 C1411May 2015May 2015
29 CFR 1910.0184 D11May 2015May 2015
29 CFR 1910.0134 C02 I11Aug 2006Aug 2006
29 CFR 1903.0016 B11Dec 1989Dec 1989
29 CFR 1910.0020 G01 I11Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0020 G0211Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0020 G01 III11Oct 1989Oct 1989
29 CFR 1910.0020 G01 II11Aug 1989Aug 1989

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

99th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 5313 within NY. Peer group: 291 employers. This establishment has 20 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
97th
peer median: $280
Inspection frequency
100th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
5.6
vs industry
+4.6
TRIR
5.6
vs industry
+3.8

Reported for 873 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
1.8
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.0
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
5.6
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Complaint
5
Accident
2
Follow-up
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Aug 2015 – May 2021 · 1 in last 5 years

Reports
6
Hospitalizations
4
Amputations
2
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
May 10, 2021Fall through surface or existing opening 16 to 20 feetWrist(s)Hospitalized
Mar 19, 2018Other fall to lower level less than 6 feetHeel(s)Hospitalized
Jul 24, 2017Struck by or caught in swinging door or gateFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation
Aug 31, 2016Fall on same level while climbing stairs, steps, or curbsElbow(s)Hospitalized
Aug 19, 2016Fall on same level, n.e.c.Arm(s), unspecifiedHospitalized
Aug 12, 2015Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaningFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
11 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 11+ years. Most recent activity: 11 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for RIVERBAY CORPORATION. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for RIVERBAY CORPORATION. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in NY — for RIVERBAY CORPORATION, not this location alone

Total cases
29
Unfair labor practice
25
Representation (union)
4

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other RIVERBAY CORPORATION locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 29 cases · 25 ULP · 4 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
02-CA-389684Unfair labor practiceJun 2026OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-376859Unfair labor practiceDec 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-348028Unfair labor practiceAug 2024Oct 2024ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-258874Unfair labor practiceApr 2020Jun 2020ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-244064Unfair labor practiceJun 2019Jul 2019ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-230442Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Mar 2019ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-224474Unfair labor practiceJul 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-223113Unfair labor practiceJul 2018Mar 2019ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-222186Unfair labor practiceJun 2018Mar 2019ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-217835Unfair labor practiceApr 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-RC-210336Representation electionNov 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-RC-209873Representation electionNov 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-209785Unfair labor practiceNov 2017Jan 2018ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-209784Unfair labor practiceNov 2017Jan 2018ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-203600Unfair labor practiceAug 2017Sep 2017ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-202614Unfair labor practiceJul 2017Jul 2018ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-RD-195961Representation electionMar 2017Apr 2017ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-107234Unfair labor practiceJun 2013Dec 2013ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-100540Unfair labor practiceMar 2013Jun 2013ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-097515Unfair labor practiceFeb 2013Feb 2013ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-040229Unfair labor practiceNov 2010Jan 2011ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-040120Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-039961Unfair labor practiceJun 2010Jul 2010ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-038771Unfair labor practiceMay 2008Jan 2009ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-038696Unfair labor practiceMar 2008Apr 2008ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-RC-023229Representation electionOct 2007Dec 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-038427Unfair labor practiceAug 2007Oct 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-038278Unfair labor practiceMay 2007Jun 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-038161Unfair labor practiceMar 2007Jul 2007ClosedRegion 02, New York, New York

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for RIVERBAY CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for RIVERBAY CORPORATION. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)

DOT number
1514644
Operation
C

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for RIVERBAY CORPORATION. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2015-03-30Fatality/Catastrophe65$10,000
2011-03-22Accident0$0
2006-08-15Complaint1$0
2002-08-28Complaint0$0
2002-08-15Complaint0$0
1996-02-06Programmed Related33$3,750
1990-01-17Follow-up0$0
1989-12-19Follow-up1$0
1989-08-29Complaint95$3,540
1982-08-18Complaint0$0
1979-10-26Accident0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in residential property managers within NY, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on RIVERBAY CORPORATION from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is RIVERBAY CORPORATION's OSHA violation history?
RIVERBAY CORPORATION has 11 OSHA inspections on record with 20 violations and $17,290 in total penalties.
How does RIVERBAY CORPORATION's safety record compare to its industry?
RIVERBAY CORPORATION operates in the residential property managers industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 1.8. RIVERBAY CORPORATION's self-reported DART rate is 5.6 compared to an industry average of 1.
Has RIVERBAY CORPORATION had any workplace fatalities?
Yes. Federal records show 1 fatality investigation involving RIVERBAY CORPORATION.