Summary
PROGRESSIVE STAMPING has accumulated 18 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 20 years of recorded history, with $17,640 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 66th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 289 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 37th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 10 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
PROGRESSIVE STAMPING appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 18 distinct standards shown · 18 citations in this view · $17,640 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 C01 I | 1 | 1 | $3,185 | Jul 2016 | Jul 2016 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0132 D01 | 1 | 1 | $3,185 | Jul 2016 | Jul 2016 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 C01 | 1 | 1 | $1,820 | Jul 2016 | Jul 2016 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 C03 IV | 1 | 1 | $1,500 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0255 B04 | 1 | 1 | $1,500 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 1 | 1 | $750 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 C02 IA | 1 | 1 | $750 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 C05 I | 1 | 1 | $750 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 D09 I | 1 | 1 | $750 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 B07 VIII | 1 | 1 | $600 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 E01 I | 1 | 1 | $600 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 G02 | 1 | 1 | $450 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E01 I | 1 | 1 | $450 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0110 E04 III | 1 | 1 | $450 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B02 | 1 | 1 | $450 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 1 | 1 | $450 | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0138 A | 1 | 1 | — | Jul 2016 | Jul 2016 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0217 E01 II | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2006 | Aug 2006 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Above average violations in NAICS 3321 within OH. Peer group: 289 employers. This establishment has 18 OSHA violations; peer median is 9.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for PROGRESSIVE STAMPING. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jun 2016
Most frequent event: Struck against object or equipment while moving it
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | Struck against object or equipment while moving it | Fingertip(s) | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 10+ years. Most recent activity: 10 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for PROGRESSIVE STAMPING. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for PROGRESSIVE STAMPING. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for PROGRESSIVE STAMPING. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for PROGRESSIVE STAMPING. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for PROGRESSIVE STAMPING. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-30 | Referral | 4 | 4 | $8,190 | |
| 2006-06-05 | Complaint | 14 | 14 | $9,450 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in this industry within OH, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- MANCOR INDUSTRIES, INC.DAYTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- ART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.HAMILTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- DAYTON ROGERS OF OHIO, INC.COLUMBUS — 2 federal enforcement records
- OMNI MANUFACTURING, INC.SAINT MARYS — 2 federal enforcement records
- T & W STAMPINGALLIANCE — 2 federal enforcement records
- ACKLIN STAMPING CO.TOLEDO — 2 federal enforcement records
- DUNCAN METAL SPINNING CO.TOLEDO — 2 federal enforcement records
- SECTIONAL STAMPING INC.WELLINGTON — 2 federal enforcement records
- NN METAL STAMPINGS, INC.PIONEER — 2 federal enforcement records
- TARGET STAMPED PRODUCTS CORP.KINSMAN — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- NAICS 332All employers in this industry
- Employers in OHState-wide enforcement data
- Industry in OHIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on PROGRESSIVE STAMPING from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is PROGRESSIVE STAMPING's OSHA violation history?
- PROGRESSIVE STAMPING has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 18 violations and $17,640 in total penalties.