Skip to main content

Establishment profile

MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP

102 RAILROAD ST. N, BRADY, MT, 59416
Operated by Mountain View Co-op · 1 of 6 establishments
311211Flour Milling

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 16 years
Violations
9
$7,000 in penalties
Penalties
$7,000
$778 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP has accumulated 9 OSHA violations across 2 inspections over 16 years of recorded history, with $7,000 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 75th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 13 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 83rd percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 16 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP appears in OSHA workplace safety and MSHA mine safety records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 16 yrs
Violations
9
0.6 / yr
Penalties
$7,000
$778 avg / violation
100% serious0% other
Inspection trigger · planned
2 of 2

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 9 distinct standards shown · 9 citations in this view · $7,000 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0307 C11$1,800Aug 2010Aug 2010
29 CFR 1910.0272 J0111$1,800Aug 2010Aug 2010
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0111$500Aug 2010Aug 2010
29 CFR 1910.0219 D0111$500Aug 2010Aug 2010
29 CFR 1910.0272 M0311$500Aug 2010Aug 2010
29 CFR 1910.0272 M0411$500Aug 2010Aug 2010
29 CFR 1910.0272 D11$500Aug 2010Aug 2010
29 CFR 1910.0146 C0411$500Aug 2010Aug 2010
29 CFR 1910.0025 B01 I11$400Aug 2010Aug 2010

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

75th

Above average violations in NAICS 3112 within MT. Peer group: 13 employers. This establishment has 9 OSHA violations; peer median is 0.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
83rd
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
83rd
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−2.2
TRIR
14.4
vs industry
+11.3

Reported for 18 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
14.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
16 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 16+ years. Most recent activity: 16 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

Company-level in MT — for Mountain View Co-op, not this location alone

Violations
2
Assessed penalties
$0

Mine Safety & Health Administration — citations issued at mining operations. MSHA records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Mountain View Co-op operations in the same state.

MSHA citations

Mine Safety and Health Administration citations. S&S (significant and substantial) marks violations that could reasonably contribute to a serious injury. Negligence rating is MSHA’s operator-culpability assessment (none, low, moderate, high, or reckless disregard). Proposed = assessed at issuance; Paid = post-settlement / appeal. 2 citations · 1S&S · 2 contractor.

CitationMineDateSectionS&SNegligenceProposedPaid
6271026
PORTABLE CRUSHER
Cascade, MT
contractor: Mountain View Coop
Oct 2004YesModNegligence
6271025
PORTABLE CRUSHER
Cascade, MT
contractor: Mountain View Coop
Oct 2004No

Source: MSHA citation database. “Contractor” annotations indicate the cited party was on-site at the mine but not the mine’s operator -- responsibility attaches to the contractor LLC, not the mine’s owner. Section codes reference 30 CFR (the Mine Safety and Health regulations).

Labor relations (NLRB)

No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

EPA-registered facilities

Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.

FacilityPermitsStatusInspectionsFormal actionsPenaltiesLast inspectedECHO
MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP
102 RAILROAD ST. N · BRADY, MT, 59416
01View →

Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2010-06-10Planned99$7,000
2010-06-10Planned0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP is one of 6 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Mountain View Co-op.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Mountain View Co-op across all 6 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in flour milling within MT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Mountain View Co-op, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Mountain View Co-op, which operates 6 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP's OSHA violation history?
MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 9 violations and $7,000 in total penalties.
How does MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP's safety record compare to its industry?
MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP operates in the flour milling industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.1. MOUNTAIN VIEW CO-OP's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 2.2.