Establishment profile
MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.
170 FOX DRIVE, PIQUA, OH, 45356
332813 — Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
Summary
MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C. has accumulated 42 OSHA violations across 9 inspections over 16 years of recorded history, with $48,658 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 94th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 333 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 96th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 5 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C. appears in OSHA workplace safety and WHD wage enforcement records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
89% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 8 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 28 citations in this view · $46,898 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0138 A | 2 | 2 | $6,723 | Jun 2015 | Dec 2020 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G02 III | 2 | 2 | $2,800 | Oct 2012 | Jun 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 2 | 2 | $2,710 | Jun 2010 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 D03 | 2 | 2 | $2,700 | May 2010 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 2 | 2 | $2,200 | May 2010 | Jun 2015 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 E01 | 2 | 2 | $750 | Jun 2010 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0095 C01 | 2 | 2 | $370 | Jun 2010 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H01 | 2 | 2 | $260 | Jun 2010 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0095 G06 | 1 | 1 | $8,800 | Jun 2014 | Jun 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E01 | 1 | 1 | $4,085 | Jun 2015 | Jun 2015 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0095 G01 | 1 | 1 | $3,700 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 C01 | 1 | 1 | $2,600 | Jun 2014 | Jun 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1000 E | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Jun 2014 | Jun 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1026 L01 | 1 | 1 | $2,000 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 E03 I | 1 | 1 | $1,700 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H03 IV | 1 | 1 | $1,500 | Jun 2014 | Jun 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0025 D02 XV | 1 | 1 | $1,000 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0038 B | 1 | 1 | $400 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 II | 1 | 1 | $300 | Jun 2014 | Jun 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0157 E01 | 1 | 1 | $300 | Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3328 within OH. Peer group: 333 employers. This establishment has 42 OSHA violations; peer median is 6.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 46 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Jan 2015 – Oct 2020 · 1 in last 5 years
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2020 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation | Fingertip(s) | Amputation | |
| Jan 14, 2015 | Contact with objects and equipment, unspecified | Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c. | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2020 | Aluminum Processing,Amputated,Amputation,Belt,Catch Point,Caught By,Deburring,Finger,Fingertip,Glove,Grinding,Grinding Machine,Grinding Wheel,Inexperience,Instantaneous amputation,Lathe,Machine Guarding,Machine operator,Material Handling,PPE,PPE Hazard Assessment,Partial Amputation,Protective Clothing,Pulled In,Rotating Parts,Traumatic Amputation | 1 | — | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 5+ years. Most recent activity: 5 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.
Wage and hour breakdown by law
Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 1 statute · 10 violations · $2,263 in backwages
| Statute | Period | Cases | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLSA — minimum wage & overtime | Jan 2011 | 1 | 10 | 9 | $2,263 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.
Wage and hour cases
Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 10 violations · $2,263 in backwages · 9 workers affected
| Case period | Industry | Statutes | Violations | Workers | Backwages | Civil penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2009 – Jan 2011 | Other Aluminum Rolling and Drawing | FLSA | 10 | 9 | $2,263 | — |
Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | Referral | 1 | 1 | $4,723 | |
| 2015-08-20 | Monitoring | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2015-01-23 | Referral | 4 | 4 | $8,085 | |
| 2014-01-17 | Follow-up | 7 | 6 | $14,900 | |
| 2014-01-17 | Follow-up | 2 | — | $2,600 | |
| 2012-07-25 | Follow-up | 8 | 3 | $8,900 | |
| 2012-07-25 | Follow-up | 5 | 2 | $5,700 | |
| 2010-05-19 | Referral | 8 | 8 | $1,900 | |
| 2010-05-06 | Planned | 7 | 5 | $1,850 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring within OH, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- AMAC ENTERPRISES, INC.PARMA — 3 federal enforcement records
- GOODRICHCLEVELAND — 2 federal enforcement records
- HALE PERFORMANCE COATINGS, INC.TOLEDO — 2 federal enforcement records
- BAZETTA STEEL PROCESSING, LLCLAKEWOOD — 2 federal enforcement records
- ACME SURFACE DYNAMICS, INC.ALLIANCE — 2 federal enforcement records
- PARKER RUST-PROOF OF CLEVELANDCLEVELAND — 2 federal enforcement records
- ELYRIA PLATING CORP.ELYRIA — 2 federal enforcement records
- OHIO ANODIZING COMPANY, INC.COLUMBUS — 2 federal enforcement records
- METOKOTE CORPORATIONHUBER HEIGHTS — 2 federal enforcement records
- CLEVELAND PLATING, LLCCLEVELAND — 2 federal enforcement records
Related searches
- Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringAll employers in this industry
- Employers in OHState-wide enforcement data
- Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, in OHIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.'s OSHA violation history?
- MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C. has 9 OSHA inspections on record with 42 violations and $48,658 in total penalties.
- How does MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.'s safety record compare to its industry?
- MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C. operates in the electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.1. MIAMI VALLEY POLISHING L.L.C.'s self-reported DART rate is 7.36 compared to an industry average of 2.3.