Establishment profile
MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY
2000 E. JAMES BLVD., SAINT JAMES, MO, 65559
326111 — Plastics Bag and Pouch Manufacturing
EIN 430960017
Summary
MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY has accumulated 8 OSHA violations across 6 inspections over 28 years of recorded history, with $7,708 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 62nd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 360 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 87th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 7 years ago.
Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY appears in OSHA workplace safety, EPA environmental compliance, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 7 distinct standards shown · 8 citations in this view · $7,708 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 B | 2 | 2 | — | Nov 2001 | Feb 2019 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 1 | 1 | $4,641 | Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 II | 1 | 1 | $2,254 | Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0106 E02 II | 1 | 1 | $500 | Mar 2000 | Mar 2000 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0023 A04 | 1 | 1 | $313 | Nov 2001 | Nov 2001 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 1 | 1 | — | Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 1 | 1 | — | Nov 2001 | Nov 2001 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Above average violations in NAICS 3261 within MO. Peer group: 360 employers. This establishment has 8 OSHA violations; peer median is 5.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 82 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Feb 2019
Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).
Severe injury reports — events
Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.
| Date | Event | Body part | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2019 | Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation | Fingertip(s) | Amputation |
Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2019 | Amputated,Amputation,Caught In,Crane,Cylinder,Finger,Maintenance,Printing Press | 1 | 1 | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 7+ years. Most recent activity: 7 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 1 facility.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY 2000 E JAMES BLVD · ST JAMES, MO, 65559 | AirWaterRCRA | No Violation Identified QNCR 1 | 3 | 0 | — | Dec 2024 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-19 | Referral | 4 | 3 | $6,895 | |
| 2006-05-18 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2001-10-31 | Planned | 3 | 1 | $313 | |
| 2000-02-16 | Planned | 1 | — | $500 | |
| 1998-06-17 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1997-09-09 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in plastics bag and pouch manufacturing within MO, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- CONTINENTAL PRODUCTSMEXICO — 2 federal enforcement records
- T-N-T PLASTICS, INC.PERRYVILLE — 2 federal enforcement records
- TECHNICAL SALES AND SERVICE INC.FENTON — 1 federal enforcement record
- MEXICO PLASTIC COMPANY INC.MEXICO — 1 federal enforcement record
- MASTERPAC CORPORATIONSAINT LOUIS — 1 federal enforcement record
- MONDI JACKSON LLCJACKSON — 1 federal enforcement record
- HILEX POLY CO., LLCSAINT LOUIS — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Plastics Bag and Pouch ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in MOState-wide enforcement data
- Plastics Bag and in MOIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY's OSHA violation history?
- MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY has 6 OSHA inspections on record with 8 violations and $7,707.5 in total penalties.
- How does MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY's safety record compare to its industry?
- MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY operates in the plastics bag and pouch manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.9. MANCHESTER PACKAGING COMPANY's self-reported DART rate is 6.07 compared to an industry average of 2.1.