Skip to main content

Establishment profile

LOCKHEED MARTIN

1 LOCKHEED BLVD., FORT WORTH, TX, 76108
Operated by Lockheed Martin · 1 of 200 establishments
336411Aircraft Manufacturing
EIN 521893632

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
2
over 16 years
Violations
1
$6,971 in penalties
Penalties
$6,971
$6,971 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

LOCKHEED MARTIN has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 2 inspections over 16 years of recorded history, with $6,971 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 36th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 105 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 66th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 9 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

LOCKHEED MARTIN appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
2
0.1 / yr · last 16 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$6,971
$6,971 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 2

50% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $6,971 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0179 B0511$6,971Sep 2017Sep 2017

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

36th

Below average violations in NAICS 3364 within TX. Peer group: 105 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
68th
peer median: $1,155
Inspection frequency
66th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
0.0
vs industry
−1.4
TRIR
0.0
vs industry
−2.0

Reported for 556 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.0
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.4
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
2

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Oct 2016 – Oct 2021 · 2 in last 5 years

Reports
3
Hospitalizations
3
Amputations
0
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Other fall to lower level less than 6 feet

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Oct 20, 2021Struck by rolling object or equipment-other than powered vehicle, n.e.c.Multiple trunk locationsHospitalized
May 27, 2021Other fall to lower level less than 6 feetChest, except internal location of diseases or disordersHospitalized
Oct 11, 2016Other fall to lower level less than 6 feetLower leg(s)Hospitalized

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
9 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 9+ years. Most recent activity: 9 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$0
Employees affected
1

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · $0 in backwages · 1 worker affected

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
May 2009 – May 2011Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing1

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for LOCKHEED MARTIN. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in TX — for Lockheed Martin, not this location alone

Total cases
35
Unfair labor practice
35

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Lockheed Martin locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 35 cases · 35 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
16-CA-376866Unfair labor practiceDec 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-367813Unfair labor practiceJun 2025OpenRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-358781Unfair labor practiceJan 2025OpenRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-317148Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-296695Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-289005Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Apr 2025ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-245911Unfair labor practiceAug 2019Feb 2020ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-208519Unfair labor practiceOct 2017Jan 2018ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-206481Unfair labor practiceSep 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-168890Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016May 2016ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-119784Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Mar 2014ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-109841Unfair labor practiceJul 2013Sep 2013ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-087063Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Sep 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-086587Unfair labor practiceAug 2012Oct 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-085432Unfair labor practiceJul 2012Aug 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-085431Unfair labor practiceJul 2012Aug 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-085426Unfair labor practiceJul 2012Aug 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-085418Unfair labor practiceJul 2012Aug 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-083167Unfair labor practiceJun 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-082681Unfair labor practiceJun 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-081991Unfair labor practiceMay 2012Mar 2014ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-081446Unfair labor practiceMay 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-079448Unfair labor practiceApr 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-079440Unfair labor practiceApr 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-079219Unfair labor practiceApr 2012Jul 2012ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-076840Unfair labor practiceMar 2012Aug 2013ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-028063Unfair labor practiceJun 2011Aug 2011ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-027643Unfair labor practiceSep 2010Nov 2010ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-027298Unfair labor practiceFeb 2010Apr 2010ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-026685Unfair labor practiceApr 2009Jul 2009ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-025396Unfair labor practiceJan 2007Mar 2007ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-024916Unfair labor practiceApr 2006Aug 2007ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-024694Unfair labor practiceDec 2005Jan 2006ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-023640Unfair labor practiceMay 2004Jul 2005ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas
16-CA-022106Unfair labor practiceAug 2002Jan 2003ClosedRegion 16, Fort Worth, Texas

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for LOCKHEED MARTIN. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for LOCKHEED MARTIN. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for LOCKHEED MARTIN. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Federal contracts

This location

Obligated (5-yr)
$106.8B
Obligated (all-time)
$303.2B
Awards
6,817
Top agency
Department of Defense
$303.1B
Company-wide — LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP (across 279 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$270.3B
Obligated (all-time)
$896.5B
Awards (all-time)
730,105

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Top agencies by obligation (this location)
Department of Defense$303.1B
National Aeronautics and Space Administration$59.2M
Department of Homeland Security$2.8M
Department of Commerce$74K

Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 336411 - AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING. Last action: 2026-06-24. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2017-03-30Complaint1$6,971
2010-02-26Complaint0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

LOCKHEED MARTIN is one of 200 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Lockheed Martin.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Lockheed Martin across all 200 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in aircraft manufacturing within TX, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Lockheed Martin, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on LOCKHEED MARTIN from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Lockheed Martin, which operates 200 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is LOCKHEED MARTIN's OSHA violation history?
LOCKHEED MARTIN has 2 OSHA inspections on record with 1 violation and $6,971 in total penalties.
How does LOCKHEED MARTIN's safety record compare to its industry?
LOCKHEED MARTIN operates in the aircraft manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2. LOCKHEED MARTIN's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.4.