Skip to main content

Establishment profile

KING SOOPERS

3050 W. NORTHERN AVENUE, PUEBLO, CO, 81005
445110Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers (except Convenience Retailers)

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
1
over 13 years
Violations
1
$3,300 in penalties
Penalties
$3,300
$3,300 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.

Summary

KING SOOPERS has accumulated 1 OSHA violation across 1 inspection over 13 years of recorded history, with $3,300 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 45th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 133 employers. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 13 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

KING SOOPERS appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
1
0.1 / yr · last 13 yrs
Violations
1
0.1 / yr
Penalties
$3,300
$3,300 avg / violation
Inspection trigger · complaint
1 of 1

100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 1 distinct standard shown · 1 citation in this view · $3,300 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0303 G0111$3,300Jul 2013Jul 2013

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

45th

Below average violations in NAICS 4451 within CO. Peer group: 133 employers. This establishment has 1 OSHA violation; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
76th
peer median: $0
Inspection frequency
0th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for KING SOOPERS. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.7
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
Not in OSHA ITA

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
1

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for KING SOOPERS. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
13 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 13+ years. Most recent activity: 13 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for KING SOOPERS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for KING SOOPERS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CO — for KING SOOPERS, not this location alone

Total cases
267
Unfair labor practice
254
Representation (union)
11

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other KING SOOPERS locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 92 ULP · 8 representation

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
27-CA-366121Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-361343Unfair labor practiceMar 2025OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-360708Unfair labor practiceFeb 2025OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-358859Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-358843Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Jul 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-358726Unfair labor practiceJan 2025Jun 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-356031Unfair labor practiceDec 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-355959Unfair labor practiceDec 2024Jul 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-346949Unfair labor practiceJul 2024Apr 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-342238Unfair labor practiceMay 2024Mar 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-328151Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Feb 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-326456Unfair labor practiceSep 2023OpenRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-312760Unfair labor practiceFeb 2023Apr 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-309005Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Jan 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-300029Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Jan 2023ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-295852Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-289008Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Feb 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-289001Unfair labor practiceJan 2022Feb 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-288295Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-288292Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-288090Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-288085Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-288081Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-271228Unfair labor practiceJan 2021Jan 2022ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-271224Unfair labor practiceJan 2021Apr 2021ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-270607Unfair labor practiceDec 2020Dec 2020ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-266090Unfair labor practiceSep 2020Nov 2020ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-261143Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Sep 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-261062Unfair labor practiceJun 2020Sep 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-260263Unfair labor practiceMay 2020May 2020ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-259464Unfair labor practiceApr 2020Aug 2020ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-258986Unfair labor practiceApr 2020Sep 2025ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-257761Unfair labor practiceMar 2020Mar 2020ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-237389Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Apr 2019ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-237196Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Aug 2021ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-237189Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Nov 2019ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-237104Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Aug 2019ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-237077Unfair labor practiceMar 2019Aug 2021ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-235752Unfair labor practiceFeb 2019Jan 2020ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-234586Unfair labor practiceJan 2019Feb 2019ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-231734Unfair labor practiceNov 2018Jan 2019ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-231572Representation electionNov 2018Dec 2018ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-223572Unfair labor practiceJul 2018Aug 2018ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-221531Representation electionJun 2018Jun 2018ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-217561Unfair labor practiceMar 2018Jul 2018ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-215705Representation electionMar 2018Nov 2018ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-214859Representation electionFeb 2018Feb 2018ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-211524Representation electionDec 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-210608Unfair labor practiceNov 2017Dec 2017ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-208966Representation electionOct 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-208566Representation electionOct 2017Oct 2017ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-188011Unfair labor practiceNov 2016Oct 2017ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-183772Unfair labor practiceSep 2016Nov 2016ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-176372Unfair labor practiceMay 2016Aug 2016ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-175456Unfair labor practiceMay 2016Aug 2016ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-169916Unfair labor practiceFeb 2016May 2016ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-RC-167715Representation electionJan 2016Jan 2016ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-162930Unfair labor practiceOct 2015Mar 2016ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-156921Unfair labor practiceJul 2015Sep 2015ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-150190Unfair labor practiceApr 2015Aug 2015ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-148541Unfair labor practiceMar 2015Dec 2016ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-141652Unfair labor practiceNov 2014May 2015ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-139608Unfair labor practiceOct 2014Jan 2015ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-135627Unfair labor practiceAug 2014Dec 2016ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-132129Unfair labor practiceJul 2014Aug 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-131766Unfair labor practiceJun 2014Aug 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-129598Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Nov 2017ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-129263Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-129286Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-129212Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-129102Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-128254Unfair labor practiceMay 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-126340Unfair labor practiceApr 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-126102Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Jun 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-125906Unfair labor practiceApr 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-125841Unfair labor practiceApr 2014Aug 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-125359Unfair labor practiceMar 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-125358Unfair labor practiceMar 2014Jul 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-122003Unfair labor practiceFeb 2014Mar 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-121540Unfair labor practiceJan 2014Aug 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-120040Unfair labor practiceJan 2014May 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-119540Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Feb 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-119446Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Feb 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-118611Unfair labor practiceDec 2013Jul 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-118040Unfair labor practiceNov 2013Jan 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-117931Unfair labor practiceNov 2013Dec 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-117279Unfair labor practiceNov 2013Dec 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-117104Unfair labor practiceNov 2013Jan 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-116851Unfair labor practiceNov 2013Jan 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-116559Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-116429Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-115990Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-115771Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-115747Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-115662Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Jan 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-115661Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Oct 2014ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-115568Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-115429Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-115406Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado
27-CA-114987Unfair labor practiceOct 2013Nov 2013ClosedRegion 27, Denver, Colorado

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for KING SOOPERS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for KING SOOPERS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for KING SOOPERS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2013-05-22Complaint1$3,300

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in supermarkets and other grocery retailers (except convenience retailers) within CO, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on KING SOOPERS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is KING SOOPERS's OSHA violation history?
KING SOOPERS has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 1 violation and $3,300 in total penalties.
How does KING SOOPERS's safety record compare to its industry?
KING SOOPERS operates in the supermarkets and other grocery retailers (except convenience retailers) industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.1.