Skip to main content
FastDOL

Establishment profile

KAISER PERMANENTE

3200 ARDEN WAY, SACRAMENTO, CA, 95825
Operated by Kaiser Permanente · 1 of 439 establishments
561422 — Telemarketing Bureaus and Other Contact Centers

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
27
over 38 years
Violations
7
$2,820 in penalties
Penalties
$2,820
$403 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 National Emphasis Program inspections

Summary

KAISER PERMANENTE has accumulated 7 OSHA violations across 27 inspections over 38 years of recorded history, with $2,820 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 93rd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 216 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 11 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

KAISER PERMANENTE appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
27
0.7 / yr · last 38 yrs
Violations
7
0.2 / yr
Penalties
$2,820
$403 avg / violation
43% serious57% other
Inspection trigger · complaint
26 of 27

15% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 7 distinct standards shown · 7 citations in this view · $2,820 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0141 A04 I11$810May 1988May 1988
29 CFR 1910.0132 A11$720May 1988May 1988
3362 A11$465Aug 2009Aug 2009
5194 H0111$375Jan 2003Jan 2003
29 CFR 2340.000111$225Dec 1993Dec 1993
3203 A06 A11$225Dec 1993Dec 1993
29 CFR 1910.0141 A04 II11—May 1988May 1988

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

93rd

Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 5614 within CA. Peer group: 216 employers. This establishment has 7 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
91st
peer median: $198
Inspection frequency
100th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
1.3
vs industry
+1.1
TRIR
1.8
vs industry
+1.4

Reported for 807 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
0.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
0.2
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
1.8
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Complaint
26

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for KAISER PERMANENTE. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
—
Most recent activity
11 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 11+ years. Most recent activity: 11 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for KAISER PERMANENTE. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for KAISER PERMANENTE. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CA — for Kaiser Permanente, not this location alone

Total cases
446
Unfair labor practice
438
Representation (union)
8

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Kaiser Permanente locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 100 cases · 100 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
31-CA-386959Unfair labor practiceMay 2026—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-382662Unfair labor practiceMar 2026—OpenRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-382028Unfair labor practiceFeb 2026—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-381406Unfair labor practiceFeb 2026May 2026ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-376349Unfair labor practiceDec 2025Dec 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-376875Unfair labor practiceDec 2025—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-374006Unfair labor practiceSep 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-373395Unfair labor practiceSep 2025—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-369925Unfair labor practiceJul 2025Mar 2026ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-367473Unfair labor practiceJun 2025—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-366528Unfair labor practiceMay 2025Aug 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-366417Unfair labor practiceMay 2025May 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-363031Unfair labor practiceApr 2025Jan 2026ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-361698Unfair labor practiceMar 2025Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-361313Unfair labor practiceMar 2025Mar 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-356188Unfair labor practiceDec 2024—OpenRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-353652Unfair labor practiceOct 2024Mar 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-351755Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-351399Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Feb 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-351028Unfair labor practiceSep 2024Nov 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-347795Unfair labor practiceAug 2024Apr 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-347421Unfair labor practiceJul 2024Jan 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-344084Unfair labor practiceJun 2024Sep 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-343812Unfair labor practiceJun 2024Sep 2024ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-343746Unfair labor practiceJun 2024Jun 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-342772Unfair labor practiceMay 2024May 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-340913Unfair labor practiceApr 2024—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-340811Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-340797Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Jun 2024ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-339204Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Jun 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-338595Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-338425Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Dec 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-338056Unfair labor practiceMar 2024Sep 2025ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-337204Unfair labor practiceMar 2024May 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-332165Unfair labor practiceDec 2023Feb 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-332060Unfair labor practiceDec 2023Feb 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-330942Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
31-CA-329515Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Mar 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-329629Unfair labor practiceNov 2023Jan 2026ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-328275Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
20-CA-328063Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-327877Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Dec 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-327870Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-327850Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-327314Unfair labor practiceOct 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
21-CA-326511Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-326359Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-326086Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-325930Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-325913Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-325905Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-325650Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-325226Unfair labor practiceSep 2023Apr 2025ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-324019Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-323729Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Apr 2025ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-322775Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Sep 2024ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
20-CA-322812Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-322409Unfair labor practiceJul 2023Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-321116Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Jan 2024ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-319829Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-319638Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-319205Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-318253Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Dec 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-317713Unfair labor practiceMay 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-317095Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Jun 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
20-CA-316219Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 20, San Francisco, California
32-CA-315708Unfair labor practiceApr 2023Jun 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-314995Unfair labor practiceMar 2023Nov 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-312151Unfair labor practiceFeb 2023Jul 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-311343Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Mar 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
31-CA-309986Unfair labor practiceJan 2023Sep 2023ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-308610Unfair labor practiceDec 2022Nov 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
21-CA-306338Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Mar 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
21-CA-305877Unfair labor practiceOct 2022Jul 2023ClosedRegion 21, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-303035Unfair labor practiceSep 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-302155Unfair labor practiceAug 2022Jun 2024ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-299155Unfair labor practiceJul 2022Apr 2023ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-298077Unfair labor practiceJun 2022—OpenRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-296255Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-296000Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Dec 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-295536Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-295410Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-295397Unfair labor practiceMay 2022Aug 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-293190Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Jul 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-292839Unfair labor practiceMar 2022Oct 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
31-CA-290691Unfair labor practiceFeb 2022Mar 2022ClosedRegion 31, Los Angeles, California
32-CA-287269Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Jul 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-287266Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Jul 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-287259Unfair labor practiceDec 2021Jul 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-287257Unfair labor practiceDec 2021—OpenRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-286980Unfair labor practiceNov 2021Nov 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-286206Unfair labor practiceNov 2021Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-285666Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Jan 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-285303Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Sep 2025ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-285264Unfair labor practiceOct 2021Feb 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
02-CA-285266Unfair labor practiceOct 2021—OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
02-CA-285235Unfair labor practiceOct 2021—OpenRegion 02, New York, New York
32-CA-283688Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Dec 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-283282Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Mar 2022ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California
32-CA-282835Unfair labor practiceSep 2021Nov 2021ClosedRegion 32, Oakland, California

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for KAISER PERMANENTE. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for KAISER PERMANENTE. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for KAISER PERMANENTE. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →

Federal contracts

No federal contracts are recorded to this specific location.

Company-wide — KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. (across 6 entities)
Obligated (5-yr)
$6.1M
Obligated (all-time)
$119.1M
Awards (all-time)
122

Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.

Federal contract activity for the parent corporation. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2015-05-20Complaint0—$0
2013-02-12Complaint0—$0
2012-11-14Complaint0—$0
2009-02-10Complaint1—$465
2008-08-25Complaint0—$0
2008-08-18Complaint0—$0
2007-06-01Complaint0—$0
2007-02-21Complaint0—$0
2006-07-13Complaint0—$0
2003-06-12Complaint0—$0
2003-06-11Unprogrammed Related0—$0
2002-11-04Complaint1—$375
2002-01-04Complaint0—$0
2001-12-18Complaint0—$0
2000-07-26Complaint0—$0
2000-07-12Complaint0—$0
1999-04-07Complaint0—$0
1998-05-20Complaint0—$0
1998-02-05Complaint0—$0
1997-09-17Complaint0—$0
1994-12-16Complaint0—$0
1993-12-06Complaint0—$0
1993-05-25Complaint2—$450
1989-01-25Complaint0—$0
1988-05-27Complaint0—$0
1988-05-27Complaint0—$0
1988-05-10Complaint33$1,530

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

KAISER PERMANENTE is one of 439 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Kaiser Permanente.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Kaiser Permanente across all 439 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in telemarketing bureaus and other contact centers within CA, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Kaiser Permanente, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on KAISER PERMANENTE from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Kaiser Permanente, which operates 439 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is KAISER PERMANENTE's OSHA violation history?
KAISER PERMANENTE has 27 OSHA inspections on record with 7 violations and $2,820 in total penalties.
How does KAISER PERMANENTE's safety record compare to its industry?
KAISER PERMANENTE operates in the telemarketing bureaus and other contact centers industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 0.4. KAISER PERMANENTE's self-reported DART rate is 1.31 compared to an industry average of 0.2.