Skip to main content

Establishment profile

FRITO-LAY, INC.

1886 UPPER MAPLE STREET, DAYVILLE, CT, 06241
Operated by Frito-Lay, Inc · 1 of 162 establishments
311919Other Snack Food Manufacturing

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
10
over 45 years
Violations
24
$23,963 in penalties
Penalties
$23,963
$998 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 fatality · 2 National Emphasis Program inspections · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

FRITO-LAY, INC. has accumulated 24 OSHA violations across 10 inspections over 45 years of recorded history, with $23,963 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 96th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 29 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

FRITO-LAY, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
10
0.2 / yr · last 45 yrs
Violations
24
0.5 / yr
Penalties
$23,963
$998 avg / violation
54% serious46% other
Inspection trigger · planned
4 of 10
Inspection trigger · referral
3 of 10

70% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 4 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 23 citations in this view · $23,963 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0219 C02 I22$1,938Mar 1994Apr 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 I22$1,400Mar 1994Apr 1999
29 CFR 1910.1200 F05 II22Mar 1994Apr 1999
29 CFR 1910.0219 F0311$10,050Sep 2025Sep 2025
29 CFR 1910.0023 C0111$2,400Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0151 C11$1,400Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.1030 F02 I11$1,400Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0134 B0711$1,400Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1904.0040 A11$1,000Mar 2005Mar 2005
29 CFR 1910.0024 F11$1,000Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0111$1,000Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0147 D11$975Jul 1996Jul 1996
29 CFR 1910.0178 Q0611Mar 2005Mar 2005
29 CFR 1910.0219 C04 I11Apr 1999Apr 1999
29 CFR 1910.0106 E02 II11Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.1200 G0811Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0303 G01 II11Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0305 B0211Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 I11Mar 1994Mar 1994
29 CFR 1910.0333 B02 I11Mar 1994Mar 1994

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

96th

Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 3119 within CT. Peer group: 29 employers. This establishment has 24 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
93rd
peer median: $2,500
Inspection frequency
100th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
1.8
vs industry
−0.4
TRIR
2.2
vs industry
−0.9

Reported for 997 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
3.1
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
2.1
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
2.2
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
4
Complaint
2
Accident
1
Referral
3

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Aug 2020 – Jun 2025 · 2 in last 5 years

Reports
3
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
3
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught, entangled in running powered equipment normal operation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Jun 8, 2025Caught, entangled in running powered equipment normal operationFinger or thumb tip(s), nail(s)Amputation
Mar 23, 2024Collision with stationary object, nonroadwayOther finger(s) n.e.c.Amputation
Aug 12, 2020Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipmentFingertip(s)Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Jan 14, 1994MAINTENANCE,BELT,CRUSHED,CONVEYOR,NECK,MACHINE--MISCFatality11

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
1 year ago

Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for FRITO-LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for FRITO-LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in CT — for Frito-Lay, Inc, not this location alone

Total cases
3
Unfair labor practice
3

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other Frito-Lay, Inc locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 3 cases · 3 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
01-CA-340192Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
01-CA-339006Unfair labor practiceApr 2024Aug 2024ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts
34-CA-008604Unfair labor practiceDec 1998Aug 2003ClosedRegion 01, Boston, Massachusetts

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for FRITO-LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for FRITO-LAY, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for FRITO-LAY, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2025-06-10Referral11$10,050
2005-02-09Planned21$1,000
1999-03-19Planned2$0
1999-02-02Planned2$938
1996-07-18Referral0$0
1996-06-10Complaint11$975
1994-01-15Accident1510$11,000
1986-04-01Referral1$0
1983-03-22Planned0$0
1981-04-09Complaint0$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

FRITO-LAY, INC. is one of 162 establishments rolled up under the parent organization Frito-Lay, Inc.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of Frito-Lay, Inc across all 162 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in other snack food manufacturing within CT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by Frito-Lay, Inc, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on FRITO-LAY, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup Frito-Lay, Inc, which operates 162 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is FRITO-LAY, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
FRITO-LAY, INC. has 10 OSHA inspections on record with 24 violations and $23,962.5 in total penalties.
How does FRITO-LAY, INC.'s safety record compare to its industry?
FRITO-LAY, INC. operates in the other snack food manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3.1. FRITO-LAY, INC.'s self-reported DART rate is 1.75 compared to an industry average of 2.1.
Has FRITO-LAY, INC. had any workplace fatalities?
Yes. Federal records show 1 fatality investigation involving FRITO-LAY, INC..